Case on Churches, Cuomo and Coronavirus Arrives at Supreme Court
Source: New York Times
WASHINGTON In recent months, churches in California and Nevada asked the Supreme Court to lift government restrictions on attendance at religious services meant to address the coronavirus pandemic. The churches lost.
The vote in both cases was 5 to 4, with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. joining what was then the courts four-member liberal wing. One of those liberals, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, died in September. Her successor, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, joined the court last month.
It will not take long to assess the significance of that switch.
On Thursday, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn filed an emergency application asking the Supreme Court to lift restrictions imposed by Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo of New York. The case is broadly similar to the earlier ones. The outcome, even as the pandemic is worsening, may be quite different.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/case-on-churches-cuomo-and-coronavirus-arrives-at-supreme-court/ar-BB1b3k5k?li=BBnb7Kz
magicarpet
(14,150 posts)Now let's all sing this wonderful hymn.
mountain grammy
(26,620 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,161 posts)pandemics mean empty pews and diminished revenue.
The world is upside down and I doubt it will right itself in 40 years.
How can you be against public health? If a pandemic cuts off your cash flow and you profit from masses said for the deceased. It's a profitable business plan!
T Ruth Phairy
(25 posts)Any Preist: "In retrospect, paying out millions to defend our molestation racket might not have been the best use of our funds."
Zing Zing Zingbah
(6,496 posts)I haven't seen anything on that in while.