Statement regarding Scott Atlas
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: Stanford University
Stanfords position on managing the pandemic in our community is clear. We support using masks, social distancing, and conducting surveillance and diagnostic testing. We also believe in the importance of strictly following the guidance of local and state health authorities.
Dr. Atlas has expressed views that are inconsistent with the universitys approach in response to the pandemic. Dr. Atlass statements reflect his personal views, not those of the Hoover Institution or the university.
Read more: https://news.stanford.edu/2020/11/16/statement-regarding-scott-atlas/
Blue Owl
(50,544 posts)for having Shatlas as one of their senior fellows
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)still_one
(92,490 posts)depends if he has any time of contractual agreement with Stanford
Gothmog
(145,784 posts)Midnight Writer
(21,830 posts)Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)Until something is done about that fellowship, no can do.
I connect his statements and misinformation with the institute and demand a review of his association with the Stanford and The Hoover Institution.
This is too serious for a disclaimer. They have to act on it.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)Link to tweet
?s=21
Norman Ornstein
@NormOrnstein
·
Nov 16, 2020
Replying to @Stanford
This statement only reinforces how deeply you have stained your university's reputation.
Norman Ornstein
@NormOrnstein
Here is a better statement: "Scott Atlas statements and actions are repugnant. His denial of science is antithetical to our academic values, his indifference to life is antithetical to our human values. We will not welcome him back to Stanford or to the Hoover Institution."
-
Pretty spineless. I am disappointed. You at least could say his opinions clash with the overwhelming weight of the evidence about COVID and condemn him for his apparent effort to incite domestic terrorism (despite the backtrack).
I don't think Stanford should comment on the weight of epidemiological opinion, but it should comment more strongly on incitement to political violence, particularly in the here and now against specific targeted govt.
Agree. By centering the University (@Stanfords position...) and not the science (epidemiologists worldwide agree...), the statement buys into the idea that political both-sidesism is an acceptable approach to the public discussion of #COVID19.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)JANUARY 28, 2020
Condoleezza Rice to lead Stanfords Hoover Institution
Rice will assume the post as head of the 100-year-old public policy research center on Sept. 1.
Former U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, currently the Denning Professor in Global Business at the Graduate School of Business and the Thomas and Barbara Stephenson Senior Fellow on public policy at the Hoover Institution, and a former Stanford provost, will be Hoovers next director, Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne announced.
not fooled
(5,803 posts)It's a blight on the university's skyline and reputation. Looms like a big dick over the campus.
And, yeah, Condi is at Hoover but archenemy Cal has torture and autocrat enabler John Yoo, speaking of reprobate chimpy stooges getting undeserved sinecures.
smb
(3,476 posts)marble falls
(57,418 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,829 posts)Source is NOT MSM.
Statement of Purpose
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.