Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,467 posts)
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 04:13 AM Dec 2020

Trump virus coordinator Birx seeks role in Biden government

Source: AP

WASHINGTON (AP) — When Dr. Deborah Birx was brought into President Donald Trump’s orbit to help fight the coronavirus pandemic, she had a sterling reputation as a former U.S. Army physician, a globally recognized AIDS researcher and a rare Obama administration holdover.

Less than 10 months later, as Trump’s time in office nears its end, the White House coronavirus task force coordinator’s reputation is frayed. And after serving every president since Ronald Reagan, her future in the incoming Joe Biden administration is uncertain.

Over the course of the pandemic, Birx drew criticism from public health experts and Democratic lawmakers for not speaking out forcefully against the president when he contradicted advice from medical advisers and scientists about how to fight the virus.

On everything from Trump’s aversion to masks to his dangerous suggestion that ingesting bleach might ward off the virus, critics and backers say Birx stepped carefully to try to maintain her influence in hopes of pushing the president to listen to the scientists.'

Read more: https://dentonrc.com/ap/washington/trump-virus-coordinator-birx-seeks-role-in-biden-government/article_45da3302-6aa0-5c87-a9da-b02dae513634.html



Link is to the Denton Record-Chronicle.
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump virus coordinator Birx seeks role in Biden government (Original Post) TexasTowelie Dec 2020 OP
She has no credibility with the public. She would do more harm than good in any public role. RockRaven Dec 2020 #1
Just Say NO BlackOpz Dec 2020 #2
um yeah...no... dhill926 Dec 2020 #3
Lotta nerve. nt SunSeeker Dec 2020 #4
If she's a civil servant... dawg day Dec 2020 #5
civil service so likely can't be fired, but.... sdfernando Dec 2020 #40
LOL, and maybe they would say she can't wear scarves over her lab coat! dawg day Dec 2020 #44
Uhh, yeah Jay25 Dec 2020 #6
NO bdtrppr6 Dec 2020 #7
Oh, hell no! Control-Z Dec 2020 #8
short answer, she was a coward when we needed courage. lastlib Dec 2020 #29
Absolutely No FarPoint Dec 2020 #9
Here's the answer... Mike Nelson Dec 2020 #10
absolutely right ... nebby70 Dec 2020 #12
No way. sinkingfeeling Dec 2020 #11
She allowed trump to dirty her up bad. So NO a thousand times over. Cousin Dupree Dec 2020 #13
This is so sad. ETTD: Trump is uniquely toxic, and it seems few can resist that toxicity up close. Hekate Dec 2020 #14
Dereliction of Duty.. denbot Dec 2020 #15
In the spirit of compromise... Alacritous Crier Dec 2020 #16
Yes friends close enemies closer BlueNProud Dec 2020 #17
No! Paper Roses Dec 2020 #18
Hell no. Her history is one of back-stabbing self-promotion. She was detested long before COVID hlthe2b Dec 2020 #19
Hell no is right! True Blue American Dec 2020 #20
I remember her blowing smoke up Trump's ass by raving about how "attentive" he was. catbyte Dec 2020 #28
I missed that! True Blue American Dec 2020 #42
Wasn't she part of the deal to move gab13by13 Dec 2020 #21
Yep! Just came out about a week ago. LiberalFighter Dec 2020 #33
This alone disqualifies her Hekate Dec 2020 #39
She had a chance and she blew it. Period rurallib Dec 2020 #22
I see what they did there with that headline... Hugin Dec 2020 #23
+33 Harker Dec 2020 #31
No effing way. BlueWavePsych Dec 2020 #24
I will rely on Joe Biden and his task force to determine that still_one Dec 2020 #25
How about free VD clinic sample taker? Yeehah Dec 2020 #26
... catbyte Dec 2020 #27
Put her on the border to care for orphened children Miigwech Dec 2020 #30
manifest utter failure as public servant, completely self-disqualified FOREVER bringthePaine Dec 2020 #32
I gave her the benefit of the doubt a few weeks ago leaving it with Dr Fauci. LiberalFighter Dec 2020 #34
Maybe she understands the word NO , but fucking NO................ turbinetree Dec 2020 #35
No way seta1950 Dec 2020 #36
Birx made her bed when she hitched her reputation and credibility to trump Cozmo Dec 2020 #37
No. dalton99a Dec 2020 #38
No. She's a plant. Do not trust her. deminks Dec 2020 #41
I'll trust Joe's decision. Joinfortmill Dec 2020 #43
Trust has to be earned and I no longer trust her. But Joe Biden will have to decide riversedge Dec 2020 #45

RockRaven

(15,016 posts)
1. She has no credibility with the public. She would do more harm than good in any public role.
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 04:22 AM
Dec 2020
Maybe she's got some usefulness out of the public eye. Is she interested in a 0% visibility role, or does she want some glory? The answer to that question answers the question of whether or not she should even be considered for anything.

dawg day

(7,947 posts)
5. If she's a civil servant...
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 04:44 AM
Dec 2020

She can g back to her agency and work anonymously. The idea that she could be trusted in charge now... absurd.

sdfernando

(4,947 posts)
40. civil service so likely can't be fired, but....
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 02:17 PM
Dec 2020

reassign her to testing lab samples nothing more, nothing less....you get to test the samples and record the results....period!

Jay25

(417 posts)
6. Uhh, yeah
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 04:47 AM
Dec 2020

I have to give that a “no” also. She, like Donald’s other pawns, has destroyed her credibility.

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
8. Oh, hell no!
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 04:52 AM
Dec 2020
"On everything from Trump’s aversion to masks to his dangerous suggestion that ingesting bleach might ward off the virus, critics and backers say Birx stepped carefully to try to maintain her influence in hopes of pushing the president to listen to the scientists.'"


I'm not buying that as the reason for how she behaved. I think she was just another star-struck trump supporter. I could be wrong. But that still wouldn't change the fact that she put Americans at risk with her silence.

Mike Nelson

(9,970 posts)
10. Here's the answer...
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 06:13 AM
Dec 2020

... she said this about Trump: "He's been so attentive to the scientific literature and the details and the data," Birx said. "I think his ability to analyze and integrate data that comes out of his long history in business has really been a real benefit during these discussions about medical issues."

How has she explained that statement?

nebby70

(471 posts)
12. absolutely right ...
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 06:25 AM
Dec 2020

... she sat/stood mute ...
... when she opted to remain mute when he suggested Clorox: well: that's when she should have positively spoken up ...
... trying to stay so she could influence him ended that moment ...
... remember, 45's only opinion of her was about all the wonderful things she could do with a scarf ...

Hekate

(90,840 posts)
14. This is so sad. ETTD: Trump is uniquely toxic, and it seems few can resist that toxicity up close.
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 06:29 AM
Dec 2020

I feel sorry for Dr Birx, the Scarf Lady.

True Blue American

(17,992 posts)
20. Hell no is right!
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 08:21 AM
Dec 2020

This is Doctor Fauci’s case. He immediately said yes to Joe Biden.

If Birx was an Obama supporter she should have stood solidly behind Fauci. Instead she went along with Trump so the light would shine on her. The bulb burnt out!

catbyte

(34,459 posts)
28. I remember her blowing smoke up Trump's ass by raving about how "attentive" he was.
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 09:42 AM
Dec 2020

She said in March:

“He’s been so attentive to the scientific literature and the details and the data,” Birx said. “I think his ability to analyze and integrate data that comes out of his long history in business has really been a real benefit during these discussions about medical issues.”

What a load.

gab13by13

(21,414 posts)
21. Wasn't she part of the deal to move
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 08:50 AM
Dec 2020

tracking the virus away from the CDC giving it to Azar and HHS who weren't set up to do the tracking?

 

Miigwech

(3,741 posts)
30. Put her on the border to care for orphened children
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 10:15 AM
Dec 2020

in cages who got COVID. Reports are 1000 got infected on her watch.

LiberalFighter

(51,122 posts)
34. I gave her the benefit of the doubt a few weeks ago leaving it with Dr Fauci.
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 10:59 AM
Dec 2020

If he thinks she should stay it would only be under the following conditions:
1) She does not make any public appearances.
2) She retires after the pandemic is over unless it lasts another 18 months then she retires at the end of 18 months.

That was before it came out that she was responsible for redirecting data from the hospitals away from CDC.

Now she should just be gone.

turbinetree

(24,720 posts)
35. Maybe she understands the word NO , but fucking NO................
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 11:01 AM
Dec 2020

She is a embarrassment to the medical field, she said nothing when the homicidal maniac said to inject and drink fucking bleach or inject the stuff.................resign, you have over 200,000 deaths on your hands lady, think about it, you sat there like a idiot and said nothing, fucking nothing...............and to even ask...............

deminks

(11,017 posts)
41. No. She's a plant. Do not trust her.
Thu Dec 10, 2020, 02:38 PM
Dec 2020

The orange jesus is dropping his booby-traps all over the government.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump virus coordinator B...