Fake electors try to deliver Arizona's 11 votes for Trump
Source: The Arizona Republic
In another sign of the lingering unrest over President Donald Trump's election loss, an Arizona group sent the National Archives in Washington, D.C., notarized documents last week intended to deliver, wrongly, the state's 11 electoral votes for him.
Copies of the documents obtained by The Arizona Republic show a group that claimed to represent the "sovereign citizens of the Great State of Arizona" submitted signed papers casting votes for what they want: a second term for Trump and Vice President Mike Pence.
Mesa resident Lori Osiecki, 62, helped created a facsimile of the "certificate of ascertainment" that is submitted to formally cast each state's electoral votes as part of an effort to prevent what she views as the fraudulent theft of the election.
"We seated before the legislators here. We already turned it in. We beat them to the game," she said.
Read more: https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/14/arizona-groups-fake-electors-try-cast-11-electoral-votes-trump/6536056002/
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Glorfindel
(10,172 posts)there will be no end to their crimes and misdemeanors.
jonstl08
(560 posts)To stop this in the future they should at the very least be charged with falsifying an official election record. Maybe a fine, jail or probation and a felony criminal record meaning they cannot vote again until they have completed their sentence including paying the fines. Oh and also make sure they have to reimburse the state incurred legal costs.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)sinkingfeeling
(57,571 posts)gopiscrap
(24,646 posts)condition of the right to vote. Also anyone on probation and out in the community should have their rights restored or be exempt from paying taxes
Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)should mean you never vote again. Sort of like how doing something illegal with a firearm means you can never own one again.
yellowdogintexas
(23,634 posts)A woman wanted to vote and because the election clerk could not find her in the voter lookup she had to file a provisional ballot
The voter had served time, but had not been signed off by her parole officer as free and clear so she was not supposed to vote.
When this surfaced, she was put in jail. So far there have been two appeals.
The election clerk had no way of knowing this and the voter did not know she was still prohibited from voting.
Of course, these folks are probably white so they might not draw punishment
soldierant
(9,305 posts)it's true that the way our current systems (each state) are set up, decisions about who should and shuld not be allowed to vote (again) are not so much made as stumbled into.
My reaction was not nearly as nuanced: "If they are so dumb they thought the National Archives would fall for this, are they really smart enough to be voting?"
Rebl2
(17,578 posts)they should be charged and like you say if we dont stop it now, then it will only get worse.
pat_k
(12,888 posts)2naSalit
(101,399 posts)They are committing crimes of falsification of legal documents, I think both federal and surely state laws have been violated here. They'd better be charged.
Karadeniz
(24,736 posts)CurtEastPoint
(19,933 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(27,429 posts)CurtEastPoint
(19,933 posts)TeamPooka
(25,577 posts)malthaussen
(18,515 posts)There needs to be some consequences for shit like this.
-- Mal
TeamPooka
(25,577 posts)mobeau69
(12,282 posts)samnsara
(18,748 posts)magicarpet
(18,468 posts).... save the bullets and the blood and skip the Civil War II.
They can start their own country,...
"The New Nazi Jesus BumFuckistan".
Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(5,586 posts)And may need to be settled again.
wnylib
(25,384 posts)to let the South go. Should have freed the slaves first, then let the South go its own way.
moriah
(8,312 posts)How will you get me TF out of here if they try to make Gilead? I don't bake bread well, and too old to be a Handmaid.
The same will be said by plenty of people even in New York, except they'd accuse Dems of trying to create Communist Russia up there as their reason for wanting to flee.
We are FAR too purple of a nation to ever have a "divorce" that is not incredibly messy/displaces far too many people.
LonePirate
(14,354 posts)onetexan
(13,913 posts)usajumpedtheshark
(673 posts)"I've never been in politics before," she said. "I'm not crazy. I'm just a person who feels like there's a problem here. We're at that (1776) moment here. It's the little people who are going to matter. You can't sit on the sidelines anymore."
Of course she also claims,
"One thing I will say about conservatives, is if something is wrong, and we have lost a true loss then we accept," she said. "We're not going to drag people through the mud and fight it. But this clearly has got issues. I saw it with my own eyes and my own research."
I'm not sure what the research entailed other going to rallies and listening to Rudey
weissmam
(910 posts)ass-holes don't realize they are being ass-holes
Plus with this being recorded they will be know as idiots for ever
LonePirate
(14,354 posts)Aerator
(189 posts)mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(21,130 posts)I'm tired of this"sovereign citizen" bullshit. Lock up all the Bundy grifters in Oregon while they're at it.
Pantagruel
(2,580 posts)"Arizona sketches out a series of criminal charges relating to voting and election fraud, but those mostly appear to mostly deal with casting regular ballots or tallying the ballots.
It also has a provision for making, possessing or presenting what are known as forged instruments with an intent to defraud. That is a felony offense.
The federal government has broad authority to prosecute what it deems mail fraud, although it is more often used to target financial crimes. There is a provision in the mail fraud statutes for depriving people of what are known as "honest services."
Solly Mack
(96,732 posts)pwb
(12,574 posts)Not.
SayItLoud
(1,774 posts)Joinfortmill
(20,661 posts)Aristus
(71,931 posts)right?
jmowreader
(53,021 posts)The claim is that any courtroom displaying a flag with gold fringe on the edges is operating under "admiralty maritime jurisdiction."
I would love to find a judge that would play with these morans: "I find you guilty of the crimes of operating a motor vehicle without a driver's license, vehicle registration, or liability insurance. The standard sentences for conviction on these offenses is $50 for each plus costs of court of $37.50. So, most people who did this would pay $187.50. However, since the defendant is convinced this is a maritime court, I must sentence him to twenty lashes and seven days in the brig on bread and water. Bailiffs, take the defendant away."
"But...but...but..."
"Are we an ordinary everyday court, sir?"
usajumpedtheshark
(673 posts)I guess nobody assigns keelhauling anymore.
(Insert pirate icon here)
jmowreader
(53,021 posts)For being a sovereign citizen, flogging and brig time is plenty.
Moral Compass
(2,365 posts)hadEnuf
(3,574 posts)How about what it really is: criminal election tampering. How about some charges against these terrorists?
riversedge
(80,200 posts)Well, if I had my say, it would be a crime.
weissmam
(910 posts)and falsifying government documents
Captain Zero
(8,826 posts)nt
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(134,234 posts)Hope they serve some time for this fraudulant bullshit.
Proud liberal 80
(4,392 posts)Javaman
(65,466 posts)i wouldn't expect any thing less from these "sovereign" assholes.
bucolic_frolic
(54,627 posts)There was no game. No race. It wasn't a competition. That's a delusion in their minds. They weren't invited to participate. They just injected themselves into the official process. Where is their sense of basic honesty, don't do this or that it's a lot of trouble? Just because it's not a financial crime doesn't make it ho-hum.
forgotmylogin
(7,945 posts)PatrickforO
(15,390 posts)SpankMe
(3,680 posts)If his bar is that low, then there must be a crime somewhere in this crazy lady's actions.
yaesu
(9,165 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(28,493 posts)exactly how the process works.
Mr. Ected
(9,713 posts)How many times has that epithet been hurled at liberals exercising their constitutional rights?
Acts of sedition are not protected by the constitution, though....so it's truly more fitting when spit in the general direction of a Trumpite.
JohnnyRingo
(20,702 posts)I've had my fill of political clowns to last a lifetime.
paleotn
(21,905 posts)She didn't beat anyone. She's a fucking moron. If it is against the law (god, I hope it is), throw her ass in jail.
onecent
(6,096 posts)LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)1) Electors in Arizona are appointed by the state political party to be on the ballot for their respective congressional district or for one of the two spots representing the Senate electors.
2) Arizona has 11 electoral votes. One from each of the 9 congressional districts. They must live in those districts.
3) It appears most if not all live in the 5th congressional district. Possibly up to 7 congressional districts were not represented by this group if they were legitimate electors.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)marmar
(79,495 posts)TomDaisy
(2,120 posts)ailsagirl
(24,287 posts)Nitram
(27,384 posts)That's like videotaping and providing your own notarized statement admitting your guilt for a bank robbery.
marble falls
(71,411 posts)... a very explicit felony attached to this.
roamer65
(37,853 posts)Charge them.
jmowreader
(53,021 posts)...that there will soon be an Arizona notary who gets his or her commission revoked for notarizing a clearly fraudulent document?