Brindisi-Tenney race narrows even more: 3 to 5 votes separate candidates
Source: Syracuse Post Standard
Incumbent Anthony Brindisi (D) and Claudia Tenney (R) are separated by three to five votes, according to an update in court from one of Brindisis attorneys. The candidates attorneys have been locked in a courtroom battle for nearly two months to determine the winner.
The attorney, Bruce Spiva, did not specify which candidate had the minuscule edge.
More than 300,000 ballots were cast in the election, making the margin separating the candidates 0.000016%. Before today, the latest unofficial vote counts had Tenney in the lead by 19 votes.
Read more: https://www.syracuse.com/politics/2020/12/brindisi-tenney-race-narrows-even-more-3-to-5-votes-separate-candidates.html
Miguelito Loveless
(4,470 posts)the canard that "My vote doesn't matter"?
Pantagruel
(2,580 posts)someone voting for POTUS in say CA might still feel that way.
sandensea
(21,658 posts)moose65
(3,168 posts)I keep hoping that maybe someday we will find a parallel universe where, since 2000, we have had:
-8 years of President Gore
-8 years of President Obama
-4 years of Madam President Hillary Clinton, getting ready for her second term
-an 8 - 1 advantage on the Supreme Court, with Thomas as the only justice who was appointed by a Republican
- no 9/11
-no endless Middle Eastern wars
-an end to gerrymandering of the House and state legislative seats
-well on our way to universal health care
Damn. I can dream, can't I??
Polybius
(15,473 posts)16 wars of one-Party rule hasn't happened since the 40's.
As for the rest of what you said, all Democratic Presidents since 1992? 28 years of one-Party rule? Even without the EC, Republicans certainly would have won a couple of elections.
robbob
(3,538 posts)Or was Id Lindsey? One of them is on record saying something to the effect of If we allowed everyone the right to vote we would never win another election....
Polybius
(15,473 posts)It takes three things: A Republican year (like 2010, but in a Presidential year), a strong Republican candidate (Reagan, as much as I hate to say it), and a not-so-strong Democrat who ran a bad campaign (Dukakis).
sandensea
(21,658 posts)Hypotheticals, by definition, are very hard to delineate. And I for one do think Gore would have been re-elected (presidents usually are, save for very fraught or disastrous tenures).
I do agree with you that 28 years of one party in the White House - à la Mexico's PRI or Sweden's Social Democrats - would have been unlikely.
Polybius
(15,473 posts)Studying the 1992 election and having lived it, there's still no good reason as to why his approval rating hit 28%. That's worse than any President since at least Nixon.
Don't get me wrong, I don't like him. But 28% boggles my mind. There were worst Presidents.
appmanga
(580 posts)...who had never trusted him, and, naturally Democrats who had been supportive of a president during a military action.
sandensea
(21,658 posts)But I agree: it was not disastrous.
Disastrous was his son's specialty.
Harker
(14,033 posts)It mattered somewhat then, what one said and what one did.
moose65
(3,168 posts)Thanks for raining on my parade. Like I said, I can dream, cant I? 🙄
sandensea
(21,658 posts)Something shocking that, by whipping people into a frenzy, would have allowed to wrest back power.
Something like...
Miguelito Loveless
(4,470 posts)527 votes in 2000.
So, even with the EC, votes matter.
IronLionZion
(45,523 posts)We shouldn't forget about local races. A lot of important stuff happens in Congress and state legislatures and city councils.