Federal judge removed from sex discrimination case after circuit rules he 'stifled' professor's acce
Source: Houston Chronicle
access to fairness
A judge with a history of belittling women has been yanked from a sex discrimination case by an appellate panel that said he suffocated a female plaintiffs access to fundamental fairness.
The case began going downhill when U.S. District Judge Lynn N. Hughes quipped he would get credit for closing two cases when I crush you.
Finding he had prejudged and been arbitrary and unreasonable, the 5th U.S. Circuit ruled on Friday that Hughes should be removed from ruling on a psychology professors challenges against two universities and another judge must start from scratch. The cases have been re-assigned to Judge Andrew S. Hanen.
A trio of male judges from the conservative circuit ruled that Hughes lumped in the womans complaints about her employer with other unrelated cases, he repeatedly failed to give her chance to request documents through the discovery process and he did not allow the professor, Audrey K. Miller, to respond before dismissing her requests on the spot. The judge also made off-key remarks about how much Miller complained, and suggested the defense lawyers pursue a dismissal, they said.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/federal-judge-removed-from-sex-discrimination-case-after-circuit-rules-he-stifled-professors-access-to-fairness/ar-BB1dixrr?li=BBnb7Kz
CurtEastPoint
(18,620 posts)I_UndergroundPanther
(12,462 posts)Asshole judge...republicans promote thier own sociopath kind. That is why you should never trust anyone on the right.
Nitram
(22,765 posts)off the bench. Considering their pedigree, it wouldn't be surprising. I imagine they will be closely watched.
More_Cowbell
(2,190 posts)Even this judge was removed from the case, not from the bench, though the story describes many abuses. We're stuck with most judges for life.
scipan
(2,338 posts)awful. Not just sexist but misogynistic, narcissistic, and just about every other bad quality of a judge. He really should be impeached if a quarter of these comments are true.
Comment #: 5166
Rating:1.3
Comments:
"Abandon hope all ye who enter here" - this judge is a poster child for black robe syndrome. Needlessly arrogant toward parties and counsel, he doesn't follow the law or procedure as detailed by CTA-5, and is actually proud of his pompous refusals to do so.
Absolute nadir of SDTx judges, and among the worst federal judges I've seen. anywhere.
Send e-mail to this poster 11/4/2007 9:33:35 PM
Civil Litigation - Private
Comment #: 4950
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is mean, nasty, outrageous and obviously biased toward corporate defendants, particularly banks. Has a limited ability to think and reason, hidden by nasty screaming personal attacks on lawyers and tirades.
Send e-mail to this poster 9/28/2007 9:44:05
Send e-mail to this poster 2/18/2010 1:17:14 PM
Civil Litigation - Private
Comment #: 9710
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Lynn Hughes should be impeached. He lacks a judicial temperment, and shows bias to one party over another the minute the parties enter his chambers. He prefers to conduct hearings in chambers so that he can railroad the parties. He has no respect for the law or appelate courts--it's basically one capricious and usually wrong-headed man deciding how things should be. He is the worst judge I encountered in my legal career.
Send e-mail to this poster 1/17/2010 3:07
http://www.therobingroom.com/Judge.aspx?ID=996