Nazi concentration camp secretary charged with 10,000 counts of accessory to murder
Source: USA Today-AP
By David Rising
BERLIN German prosecutors have charged the elderly secretary of the former SS commandant of Stutthof with 10,000 counts of accessory to murder, arguing that she was part of the apparatus that helped the Nazi concentration camp function.
The 95-year-old also faces an unspecified number of counts of accessory to attempted murder for her service at the camp between June 1943 and April 1945, Peter Mueller-Rakow, spokesman for prosecutors in the northern town of Itzehoe, said Friday.
Despite her advanced age, the suspect will be tried in juvenile court due to the fact that she was under 21 at the time of the alleged crimes, Mueller-Rakow said.
The suspect, whom Mueller-Rakow would not identify in line with German privacy laws, is believed to be in good enough health to stand trial.
Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/02/05/nazi-concentration-camp-secretary-faces-10-000-murder-accessory-counts/4406932001/
Holocaust survey:Almost two-thirds of millennials, Gen Z don't know that 6 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/09/16/holocaust-history-millennials-gen-z-cant-name-concentration-camps/5792448002/
hlthe2b
(102,119 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,044 posts)though I always have a doubt about the idea of how they could be expected to disobey an unlawful order in Nazi Germany. It would have been fatal.
PSPS
(13,579 posts)OnlinePoker
(5,717 posts)You have to think that from the time she was 7 when the Nazi's seized power in 1933, she was fed a nonstop litany of propaganda. She was then put into a position she was expected to fulfill by the State and probably fed BS like it was her sacred duty to the fuehrer's cause. How is someone raised like that supposed to discern right from wrong?
radical noodle
(7,997 posts)I'm all for accountability, but I have mixed feelings about this one.
thucythucy
(8,038 posts)were of similar age, maybe a couple of years older. The "Edelweiss Pirates of Cologne" were pretty much all teenagers, and they weren't at all fooled by the propaganda.
There are no easy answers in a situation like this. But considering this woman has lived the vast majority of her life without consequence, I'm not sure I'm willing to give her a complete break.
In any case, she'll be tried in a court of law, and will be given every opportunity to defend herself. Something the victims of the Holocaust were never allowed.
Joinfortmill
(14,387 posts)I have Jewish family members and my outrage at the holocaust knows no bounds, but this serves no good purpose.
thucythucy
(8,038 posts)The book details instances where Germans, even in the military, refused to obey orders that violated their conscience, and were not punished in any way, certainly not put to death. Generally all that happened was they were shuffled to another posting.
The fact is that many who participated in the atrocities were quite eager to "do the job." It was only when they were put on trial (and many weren't) that they tried the "I had to follow orders" defense.
MyOwnPeace
(16,917 posts)we COULD charge BunkerBoy as an accessory for over 400,000 deaths because of COVID?
What the hell - let's GO FOR IT!!!!!!
If nothing else it will totally blow out what's left of micro-brains on the MAGA front.....
reACTIONary
(5,768 posts)oldsoftie
(12,489 posts)there's no way to know how many people would have lived if he'd done things differently. I mean, we did have estimates of 2.5 million dead in a yr if we did nothing.
But its funny to picture him in one of those Nuremberg cages they used.
bdamomma
(63,799 posts)with CRIMES against Humanity. This bastard knew they have the tapes to prove it too.
brush
(53,740 posts)all that time? The war ended 76 years ago.
reACTIONary
(5,768 posts).....seems to have changed, leaving her open to prosecution.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,559 posts)I am not a fan of laws that have virtually unlimited scope and reach. Unless they have a pretty well-defined *help the camps function* it sounds like it could apply to anyone.
Railroad workers, bakers, janitors...those and many more could be said to facilitate camp functionality. As much as I despise this entire bit of history, I dislike such a catchall law, too.
reACTIONary
(5,768 posts).... ditch at the bottom of the slippery slope. Don't know if they are in the ditch yet.
mountain grammy
(26,598 posts)Behind the Aegis
(53,919 posts)...yet read some of the other comments and that phrase seems lost on them. Not surprising though.
monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)moniss
(4,166 posts)not directed at people here on DU. But isn't it amazing how people in America will cheer this "holding to account" while at the same time ignoring our past and continuing actions against Native Americans. For example how is it that we have a supposedly "progressive" channel on Sirius and 24/7 on MSNBC and now NBCLX etc. and we still have no indigenous voices given a show of even an hour per month to have on guests and present current situations facing indigenous people here in the US? But I'm so old that I can remember how ridiculous it was for the TV moguls back in the 60's/'70's to schedule "public affairs" programs with black hosts/guests to run only at 4:00 a.m. on Sunday if they had any show at all.
The U.S. has never been held accountable for what they did to the indigenous people here. The history is horrifying, and most everyday citizens know nothing about it, or current affairs.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)And you've interjected mention into this thread about a Nazi mass murderer, so what you apparently see as a moral and intellectual duty to note at every point is covered here too.
absolutely no idea how you could be so confused about my post. It clearly states that it is not in response to DU comments and it should be clear to anyone that it was observational about an additional genocide.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Carolyn Bryant Donham is only 87
She's the one who caused Emmett Till to be murdered.
Let's put her on trial for murder.
I'm sure we could find many more.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)Should we have let him go because he was an old man? He died in prison.
Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)
lutherj This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)to exterminate Jews, Gypsies, defective members of the super race, etc.
I do not share the stated notion of what constitutes an excuse for not getting sick and going home to her mother. Or imagine that just anyone would settle in to process genocide efficiently. Some would. Some would not. She's the former.
And again, what on earth does being 95 have to do with guilt? If she was guilty of killing babies and 95-year-olds at 17-19, did her guilt eventually just decompose into unidentifiable dust like the bones of the children in the mass graves?
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)I think there should be a statute of limitations on murder, such as 50 years.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)Joinfortmill
(14,387 posts)brooklynite
(94,333 posts)Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)Bayard
(22,005 posts)What are they going to do, put her in prison? She was a kid in that time.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,321 posts)She's 95, let her go.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)or gassed. Maybe they would like to have died a peaceful death surrounded by their families.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)As for living to 95 before being brought to justice? That's being extremely fortunate, not becoming less guilty.
She was an active participant in mass murder and should have gone to prison as a young woman, sentence taking into account the circumstances of her crimes. These last 70 years that she got to live and live free, a whole lifetime, are 70 years that she took away from her long-dead victims.
Response to Hortensis (Reply #21)
My Pet Orangutan This message was self-deleted by its author.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)One one hand... and then on the other hand... and then on the other hand... well, it's all there in the story.