Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,837 posts)
Wed Oct 17, 2012, 02:40 AM Oct 2012

SuperPAC to spend $2.5 million more to ‘bury Duckworth’ in negative ads

Source: Chicago Sun-Times

The plan is to “bury” Democrat Tammy Duckworth in a sea of negative ads.

The means: an additional $2.5 million.

A conservative SuperPAC touting Duckworth rival Joe Walsh is preparing to dump an extra $2.5 million into the heated 8th Congressional District race — on top of $2 million it has already spent, a source familiar with the plan told the Chicago Sun-Times. The idea is to “bury Duckworth,” the source said.

The revelation comes a day after Duckworth reported that she personally raised more than five times as much as Walsh did in the last quarter — about $1.5 million to the Republican’s $251,000. That means that the Now or Never SuperPAC spent eight times what Walsh was able to raise himself in the last quarter.


Read more: http://www.suntimes.com/news/15795374-418/superpac-to-spend-25-million-more-to-bury-duckworth-in-negative-ads-source.html



With corporate SuperPACs, who needs constituents. Just tap into the U.S. Chamber of Commerce or a billionaires SuperPAC and you can run a competitive race.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SuperPAC to spend $2.5 million more to ‘bury Duckworth’ in negative ads (Original Post) TomCADem Oct 2012 OP
Waste Of Money, Sir The Magistrate Oct 2012 #1
I'm thinking this is great HankyDub Oct 2012 #6
Walsh won't be getting re-elected. BVictor1 Oct 2012 #2
Unless they use that money to buy themselves a new candidate, they're hosed. nt SunSeeker Oct 2012 #3
It was once said that negative ads turned votefs off the ones who made them, may it be so here. freshwest Oct 2012 #4
Those negative ads will make him look like even more of an asshole LTR Oct 2012 #5
Americans seem peculiarly swayed by obviously partisan ads. fasttense Oct 2012 #7
That $2.5 million could pay a hell of a lot of child support KamaAina Oct 2012 #8
 

BVictor1

(229 posts)
2. Walsh won't be getting re-elected.
Wed Oct 17, 2012, 02:52 AM
Oct 2012

Tammy is proving that even without legs, it's possible to throughly kick someone's ass.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
4. It was once said that negative ads turned votefs off the ones who made them, may it be so here.
Wed Oct 17, 2012, 03:21 AM
Oct 2012

Duckworth deserves that seat, not Walsh.

LTR

(13,227 posts)
5. Those negative ads will make him look like even more of an asshole
Wed Oct 17, 2012, 07:57 AM
Oct 2012

Can they possibly make him more negative?

A complete waste of money. Walsh is gonna get slaughtered. But I encourage them to spend into oblivion.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
7. Americans seem peculiarly swayed by obviously partisan ads.
Wed Oct 17, 2012, 01:25 PM
Oct 2012

Mittens didn't get an upswing because of his debate performance it was all those ads he put out right after the debate that gave him a boost in the polls.

Americans seem to respond to ads more so than most populations.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»SuperPAC to spend $2.5 mi...