Kyrsten Sinema Joins Joe Manchin in Rebuking $15 Minimum Wage Being Put in Stimulus, Dashing Progres
Source: Newsweek
Full title: Kyrsten Sinema Joins Joe Manchin in Rebuking $15 Minimum Wage Being Put in Stimulus, Dashing Progressives' Hopes
Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema, a moderate Democrat, has rejected inclusion of a $15 minimum wage in President Joe Biden's coronavirus stimulus package, dashing hopes for progressive lawmakers who are pushing for the raise.
Sinema joined Democratic Senator Joe Manchin, a fellow moderate from West Virginia, in publicly rebuking the idea that raising the minimum wage is appropriate amid the ongoing stimulus bill negotiations.
The Arizona senator made her views clear during an interview with Politico this week, in which she said would "not support" any provisions not directly related to providing immediate COVID-19 relief.
"What's important is whether or not it's directly related to short-term COVID relief. And if it's not, then I am not going to support it in this legislation," Sinema told Politico.
Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/kyrsten-sinema-joins-joe-manchin-rebuking-15-minimum-wage-being-put-stimulus-dashing-1568931
bullimiami
(13,104 posts)dlk
(11,578 posts)bullimiami
(13,104 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Apparently, 60% living below the poverty line in WV is not enough.
certainot
(9,090 posts)to staff are legitimate constituents instead of idiots who believe the radio blowhards and fox twits who tell them the min wage will killl jobs
that is why dems have to digitize, analyze, boycott, and destroy rw radio
FBaggins
(26,760 posts)Not in WV anyway.
llmart
(15,555 posts)I'm not understanding your statement.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,869 posts)$15 would help immensely in a poor state like WV.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)FBaggins
(26,760 posts)There are scenarios where an increased minimum wage hurts more than it helps. Not nearly as many of them as the right would like us to believe... but they do exist.
The simple economics thought problem is to pick ever higher numbers. How about $20? or $50? or $2,000/hour. Obviously, there's a level at which mandating that wage for even the "highschool kid flipping burgers" will cost far more jobs than the higher wage actually helps. The kid who does nothing but prepares the beverages in the drive-thru will absolutely be replaced by the machine that does it automatically at some price point... and that's a different price in different markets.
The goal is a living wage for the working class. The simple fact is that "living wage" is a different figure in different parts of the country with different costs of living. Almost certainly... the state with the lowest (or second lowest?) income and low cost of living is the one most likely to be harmed by a given minimum. The representatives for that state are in the best position to evaluate whether that's the case and seem to agree.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)You can't trust Newsweek...hopefully their constituents are sending them lots of messages right now.
DeltaLitProf
(770 posts)How likely is a $15 minimum wage, even graduated, to get 10 GOP votes?
Apparently Biden plans to leave the filibuster as is.
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)The hell with everyone else. It's called conservatism.
trueblue2007
(17,240 posts)Bucky
(54,068 posts)I wonder if he can be bought off
radius777
(3,635 posts)AZ is a purple state that Biden won and there's no reason for Sinema to be so conservative. There are other better Dems such as Ruben Gallego who IMO could win statewide there.
But Manchin likely is the only Dem who can win in ruby-red WV so we have to put up with him. Though on economic issues the residents of his state likely support the mininum wage increases that he opposes.
maxrandb
(15,359 posts)Let's not help them.
Polybius
(15,488 posts)Perhaps you're thinking of Newsmax?
https://libguides.lorainccc.edu/c.php?g=29395&p=183699
My Pet Orangutan
(9,316 posts)Fail. Just fail.
maxrandb
(15,359 posts)tied to some pretty crazy Christofascist folks.
With regular editorials by the likes of Nigel Farage, Newt Gingrinch, Alan Dershowitz and a host of even nuttier wingnuts, Newsweek isn't what it used to be.
https://newrepublic.com/article/158968/newsweek-rise-zombie-magazine
kimbutgar
(21,202 posts)She stopped subscribing last year as she saw how it got more right wing in its views.
Ligyron
(7,639 posts)Maybe it was like ... way past tho'.
Griefbird
(96 posts)It seems they agree that facts have a left wing bias.
Montauk6
(8,079 posts)I think they need a redder column and drop Newsmax and ONAN in so Alex won't be lonely.
llmart
(15,555 posts)That chart is a joke.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
Overall, we rate Newsweek Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that slightly favor the left. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to two failed fact checks, however, they do correct errors.
Detailed Report
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
History
Newsweek was founded by Thomas J. C. Martyn in 1933, as a weekly magazine headquartered in New York City. Today, Newsweek is a news magazine and website, which covers news and analysis, international issues, technology, business, culture, and politics. Newsweek was bought by The Washington Post Company in 1961 and eventually sold to audio magnate Sidney Harman in 2010. The Daily Beast and Newsweek then merged in a joint venture and was named The Newsweek Daily Beast Company, which lasted for 2 years.
Yavin4
(35,446 posts)Never mind. I don't want to know.
Docreed2003
(16,876 posts)Well do Sen Sinema and Manchin agree to this? Amazing that this is where we've come in our country that a select few, whether it be McTurtle or folks on our side can actively serve as roadblocks to progress and, unless you're politically tuned in like we are, no one bats an eye at it!
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)and 2016. Now we are in rebuilding mode, and we get what we can. pressure can be applied in WVA and in Arizona as the minimum wage is pretty popular. We shall see. And no primaries please...we can't lose any seats in 2022 period. If we can't get minimum wage, we move on with other things like Infrastructure, green jobs...etc.
maxrandb
(15,359 posts)Even in this story with the 'sensationalized" headline, Senator Sinema isn't "rejecting" the minimum wage. She's simply saying if it can't be tied to COVID Relief, she won't support it.
In fact, the headline could be "Senator Sinema won't Support Giving a New Ferrari to Every American"...well, she did say "if it can't be tied to Covid relief", so I guess Ferrari's are out.
Gilbert Moore
(218 posts)There are a lot of other Dems who aren't playing holier than thou. . . We need to fight for $15 WHEREVER we can.
She is worthless.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)underground by the way and she is up for reelection in 22 by the way. If she loses and we don't win elsewhere...Mitch is back. Midterms are historically difficult for the president's party. I hope we can beat the odds.
sweetloukillbot
(11,070 posts)Stargleamer
(1,990 posts)from someone who once wrote, Until the average American realizes that capitalism damages her livelihood while augmenting the livelihoods of the wealthy, the Almighty Dollar will continue to rule.
Ollie Garkie
(186 posts)What. The. Fuck. Is. Their. Problem?
Who is paying them to be turds in the
punch bowl?
KPN
(15,661 posts)Perhaps some thought should be given to recognizing the disparity in cost-of-living that exists between States, and establish a different federal minimum wage construct -- something pegged to the real poverty level of each State rather than the one-size-fits-all that a defined $ and cents minimum wage amount nationally represents. $15 in Mississippi is way more than it is in, say, New York or California. Would $12, say, have the same effect in MS as $15 in NY?
I just wonder whether minimum wage should go the way of building codes which in Oregon, at least, eventually recognized that insulation levels don't need to be the same in coastal areas which have moderate temperatures due to thermal conditions of the Pacific Ocean as northeastern Oregon where temperatures reach relative extremes by comparison.
Just a thought. More complex, but isn't rocket science.
Mr.Bill
(24,330 posts)It is a regional issue. And while some areas have addressed it better than others, it is already being taken care of in many areas. I'm not saying there should be no federal minimum wage, and it should be higher than 7.25, but there is no logic to the minimum wage being the same in California as it is in Arkansas or West Virginia.
KPN
(15,661 posts)organized labor. As long as we have States that sponsor and support union busting/suppression, there will exist a need for federal leverage and a federal mandate of some sort. Wages have stagnated ever since manufacturing started migrating to cheap labor and governments that rigorously supported corporations over workers. That needs to stop.
Mr.Bill
(24,330 posts)but in some states a couple can buy a nice house on two $15 an hour wages. In Silicon Valley, that couple is likely homeless.
KPN
(15,661 posts)particular State's economy. Maybe California's would be pegged higher?
If we can make phones that can monitor and trade money on Wall Street among a zillion other things, we should be able to do that.
Mr.Bill
(24,330 posts)We are on a five year schedule to get to $15. There are different schedules for smaller businesses with under a certain amount of employers. This way it doesn't hit mom and pop businesses as hard. I don't have enough nationwide data to peg what the bottom should be nationally, but I'm sure it should be above 7.25. West Virginia is at 8.75 currently.
A joke I read back when Rick Perry was governor of Texas tells the story.
A businessman traveling through Texas was having breakfast at a diner and reading the newspaper. He told the waitress an article said that Rick Perry had created more jobs this year than any other governor in the country. She replied, I know, I've got three of them.
Texas still has a 7.25 minimum wage and it has the highest percentage in the country of people working for minimum wage.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)The 15.00 hour minimum would take millions out of poverty. I am all for it. It should be more in certain areas but the federal minimum should be above the poverty level...and something needs to be done with part time work forced on folks by bullshit by companies...make them pay a penalty.
llmart
(15,555 posts)Bucky
(54,068 posts)earnings of a minimum-wage worker with a family of four fall well below the poverty line. While many states and some cities have minimum wage rates much higher than $7.25, minimum-wage earners still struggle to pay bills, secure housing, and support a family.
IronLionZion
(45,534 posts)but later evolved into a conservative Democrat. I guess some people become more conservative as they age, or some special interests are paying her off.
Her constituents in Arizona could definitely use some relief. I guess she doesn't believe in trickle up economics.
Thekaspervote
(32,796 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,215 posts)Why don't they raise to $10/hr, then $1 per year until they hit $15, then index it to inflation. We get a COLA for Social Security, as small as it is. The MINIMUM wage show be indexed as well.
Mr.Bill
(24,330 posts)doing it in stages over a five year period.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,474 posts)the whole bill and take the blame personally.
Time to let them fish or cut bait.
marble falls
(57,246 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,330 posts)but not at the expense of killing the entire Covid relief bill.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,474 posts)When push comes to shove, are they seriously going to stand up and go on record destroying the entire budget bill and COVID relief? I very much doubt it. They bluff, we always fold, they know that is a fact.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(4,474 posts)If we always fold to these people, we might as well just pack it in now. They are bluffing. They are NOT going to take the heat for destroying the budget deal. They know it is political suicide.
Mr.Bill
(24,330 posts)in their states.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,474 posts)At least minimum wage and COVID relief are defensible. A vote against both is not.
Mr.Bill
(24,330 posts)You're preaching to the choir here.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,474 posts)is that they hang up on you when you are not from their state, with a "please address this to your own senator."
Mr.Bill
(24,330 posts)Escurumbele
(3,403 posts)We have a couple of couple of "Blue Dog Democrats", Joe Manchin being the leader and consistent with his votes and opposition, so a 50/50 plus Kamala Harris IS NOT a win. Manchin is a problem, and he tilts the balance too many times, I predict he will be a thorn for Democrats and Progressives trying to pass legislation.
Not trying to offend any Joe Manchin supporters, this is my humble opinion based on what I have seen the many years Manchin has been around.
Stallion
(6,476 posts)Of course, it was a major win because it took Moscow Mitch down and allows the Democrats to control the agenda in both the Senate and its committes including legislation and nominations. Its more a reflection that we did not perform in the other Senate races as well as we might have which results in divided government. Its still is a major change in the balance of power.
Escurumbele
(3,403 posts)enough for the reasons I explain. It will be interesting to count how many times the 50/50 won't be enough, all it takes is one Joe Manchin to vote with republicans to tilt the balance.
As a matter of fact, I said I did not celebrate as much as I would have liked to for the reasons I explained then and now.
Sorry I did not make a thick analysis for you.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)Last edited Fri Feb 12, 2021, 04:52 PM - Edit history (1)
about the GOP shutting down the government every other month and the debt ceiling. We need both Manchin and Sinema in order to hold the majority...you want to get more stuff done...elect Democrats in 22 against the odds.
Escurumbele
(3,403 posts)But once again, we have Democratic Senators who, like Joe Manchin, vote a lot with the other side, so a 50/50 is not good if we want Biden and the Progressives to pass laws that will really benefit the country, and not being able to pass those laws will be an disadvantage come 2022 when new Senators are being elected we all know the right to try to make it look like we did nothing, or not enough.
I don't know if I explained myself well, my comment had nothing to do with the fact that yes, when votes are 50/50 we have Kamala Harris to break it in our favour, it had nothing to do with anything else, just the tight rope of having a 50/50.
Right now we have Manchin and the other going against what Democrats want to do regarding the $15.00/hour minimum wage, we cannot count on any republican to vote against their party, so where are we? 48/52...republicans win aided by two Democrats...
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)win hearts and minds towards more progressive policies. We won't get everything but we will get some things. We have a big tent or the GOP is in power.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)Americans by blocking a Covid bill and everything else? That was the alternative. I thank God we won...consider judges alone. Really, winning is always better.
Escurumbele
(3,403 posts)It is not that I am not delighted that Moscow Mitch is not the majority leader, I AM...
What I found not so great was the fact that we had a 50/50 split that only Kamala Harris can untie.
Does anyone understand that with Senators like Joe Manchin, who tends to oppose many things Democrats want to pass, just one Senator can tilt the balance making it a 51/49 win for republicans? Why is it so difficult to understand that is what I was talking about?
When did I say I though it would be better to have Moscow Mitch in power? Don't put words on what I wrote, it has nothing to do with that.
I am happy we won the Senate, that Schumer is the majority leader, what I am not happy about is the fact that a 50/50 split is still going to make it hard for Democrats and Progressives passing bills more difficult when we have people like Manchin who can tilt the balance in favour of republicans, and then there goes our advantage.
Is that clear enough? I hope so. Why instead of attacking what I wrote you try instead to understand what I wrote?
Yes, you are right, those are good things that you point out, definitely, I am just not comfortable with the split of 50/50. I celebrated, I did, but not as much as I would if we had won a 53/47, or something like that.
Thank you for your feedback.
drray23
(7,637 posts)Manchin grumbles and make noise but he never once torpedoed a bill by himself when introduced by the democrats. On crucial votes he will vote with the caucus. When he has not in the past, he has had cover where his vote would not have decided the outcome. So, he voted against to appear moderate to his constituents. I seriously doubt he would sink a bill by himself.
mysteryowl
(7,396 posts)$14
$13
$12
$11...
$8?
durablend
(7,465 posts)mysteryowl
(7,396 posts)Massacure
(7,526 posts)If the choice is $11.00 or nothing, the Democrats should take $11.00 and run. With the sole exception of 1968, the inflation adjusted minimum wage has never been worth more than $11.00. $11.00 is a win.
vsrazdem
(2,177 posts)montanacowboy
(6,103 posts)and cut these two off at the knees and make them irrelevant
Make DC and Puerto Rico States. End of story. Goodbye Manchin and Sinema.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)bearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)Oh, and both Manchin and Sinema have said they're against killing the filibuster...so...
Evolve Dammit
(16,773 posts)about right for taxation? McCain thought 4 million was about right. He was serious. And Bush had no idea how much groceries cost? I think most extremely wealthy just plain don't care and don't even bother to connect with the rabble. They want to extract everything they can from "labor" and pay the bare minimum. They'd sell your body parts if they could. Fifteen bucks is at least a chance to pay bills, but you're not going to go anywhere on it. Subsistence wages, and even that is too much for them.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)in 22
dobleremolque
(492 posts)"Cursed-In" Sinema for nothin'.
sandensea
(21,672 posts)The one where some centrist Democrat caves to GOPee pressure in order to appear "bi-partisan"...
And then ends up losing the next election because 10-20% of Democrats stay home rather than vote for you, while 100% of Repug voters stick with their fascist hyena candidate.
Bad policy, and politics.
radius777
(3,635 posts)Voters don't care about bipartanship per se, only results. Repubs know this and want to obstruct or trick conservative Dems into being 'bipartisan' - who Repubs will then run against as 'not producing results'.
sandensea
(21,672 posts)I expected it from Senator Epipen - but not from Sinema.
Perhaps I should have.
cstanleytech
(26,319 posts)rather I think they should be paid a hell of alot more not to mention that we will be right back where we started from eventually as wages stagnant yet the price of living gradually increases.
No, I think we need a more drastic method to increase most workers wages and imo it is one that ties the workers wages to the taxes companies pay.
For example if we raise the corporate tax to 60% on businesses that earn over 50 million a year and make it so that the only way to lower that is by the size of their work force and the number of employees that they have that earn 500% over what the federal minimum wage is as automatically adjusted by the Treasury department with zero say by Congress on what it is set at.
The larger the workforce and the more workers that they have (contract, temp workers and those that work at a franchise count) that earn over that the less they pay in corporate taxes.
The other thing is that overseas workers should count towards the number of employees that they have though the wages do not count.
That way it makes it less profitable for companies to offshore jobs to avoid paying their taxes.
chowder66
(9,081 posts)Has this new stance been reported by anyone reputable?
Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
Kyrsten Sinema
@kyrstensinema
A full-time minimum-wage earner makes less than $16k a year. This ones a no-brainer. Tell Congress to #RaiseTheWage!
Link to tweet
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,343 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)If they had no loyalty to the party, they'd be insufferable. I'm very happy that they're Democrats.
hibbing
(10,109 posts)Response to Polybius (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)states. And pressure can be brought on both of them if they try anything.
BradBo
(531 posts)Their districts must be just a tiny bit bluish.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)majority.
Bucky
(54,068 posts)It's not like a jump to $15 overnight. Is it economist, I think even a four-year phase in, which they're talking about, would be a little rushed.
But you have to go the full 15. Manchin's idea of an $11 pay floor over 4 years would produce almost the same inflation as Biden's 15, so the bulk of the added buying power would mostly go to landlords and healthcare premiums.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)BradBo
(531 posts)Their districts must be just a tiny bit bluish.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,657 posts)Dont cave to their rhetoric, take the bill to a floor vote, with the $15 min wage intact, and Make them vote to kill the whole stimulus bill.
But first, send VP Harris back to their states to interview with local media about how their obstruction will harm every person in their state.
If they vote against the stimulus bill, their careers are over.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)minimum wage in the end as it popular in most states.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,657 posts)Despite their rhetorical objections, if the COVID bill were taken to a floor vote with the $15 min wage intact, I dont think Manchin and Sinema would have the guts to vote against it- they know it would end their careers.
Dems need to call their bluff and not give in to obstructionism.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,176 posts)Why does the MSM and Democrats as well, shy away from using the correct term for politicians, who routinely take the more conservative position.
I'll give you a hint, the name is within my first sentence.
You guessed it...."CONSERVATIVE". That is not a party, but a political position through which you see the world.
Some here use the term DINO. Even that is incorrect. They never pretended to be Democrats, at east the kind of Democrat that believes in traditional Democratic policy. They were always conservatives. And are very comfortable in that crowd. They are conservative Democrats.
Turin_C3PO
(14,077 posts)Hes no liberal but hes not a conservative.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Especially considering that if WV put a Republican in that seat, he/she would vote with the GOP 99% of the time (or more).
LiberalLovinLug
(14,176 posts)Its a mindset. It will be a constant fight to pull him over to even a moderate position.
Maybe its because I am defining moderate and conservative like the rest of the planet does. I realize that in the US, everything is zero outed and skewed to the right before any definition is given.
Turin_C3PO
(14,077 posts)that worldwide hed definitely be considered conservative. But Im just saying within our system hes pretty much straight in the center .
drray23
(7,637 posts)I doubt he would torpedo a crucial vote just by himself. Schumer would make sure of that before putting the bill on the floor.
vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)Because these two are utterly fucking useless
0nirevets
(391 posts)rickyhall
(4,889 posts)Not Fred's Dino...
TomDaisy
(1,918 posts)marie999
(3,334 posts)unemployment benefits. That is what is important now.
marie999
(3,334 posts)unemployment benefits. That is what is important now.
madeup64
(257 posts)Considering here in Arizona we passed a measure to increase the minimum wage and it increases every year based upon inflation perhaps she would realize her constituents are in favor of this.
jorgevlorgan
(8,334 posts)krawhitham
(4,647 posts)It's the only shot they have to pass a pandemic bill. You only get one shot with reconciliation
Dyedinthewoolliberal
(15,590 posts)Currently the min wage is what 7.25? Would they vote for 10 or 12 now? Come back in a few years and bump it again?
patphil
(6,213 posts)It's a 50/50 situation, so we need every Democrat to be on board to pass any legislation. The question is, will they support the bill with concessions, and what will those concessions be?
I don't blame them, this is the first real power they've had, and they intend to make the most of it.
If the Republicans weren't such shits, we might be able to pass this without them, but that's highly unlikely.
Renew Deal
(81,873 posts)Snackshack
(2,541 posts)Yet people think it is still a good thing to keep him in the caucus. Not sure why Sinema is doing this. This is why Dems are thought of as weak they never get on the same page when they actually have the opportunity to make a change as the GOP does. Why anyone would block raising the minimum wage from $7.25 after well over two decades to $15 makes no sense.
jorgevlorgan
(8,334 posts)Snackshack
(2,541 posts)Doing it now would be suicidal so we are stuck with him. The Dems should have dealt with this issue many, many years ago when he pulled this bull 💩 before.
ChazII
(6,206 posts)but for those who do read her Facebook page and what her voters are telling her.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,571 posts)COVID relief and raising the minimum wage are not only NOT mutually exclusive, they are not even incongruous. In terms of difficulty, there are probably an unfathomable number of "t's" to cross and "i's" to dot, which making the minimum wage is, by comparison, a couple of ticks on a register.
How can it be much more difficult than taking a statement like "Minimum wage = x" and changing it to "Minimum wage = $15."
BobTheSubgenius
(11,571 posts)The sentence containing "t's to cross" etc should have contained "in writing COVID relief legislation" just after "dot."
StevieM
(10,500 posts)And states would have the right to go higher.
Hillary understood that $15 would never pass. She proposed an increase that was significantly larger than the $10.10 Obama had proposed. It would have been the highest minimum wage in American history, even taking inflation into account.
She was lambasted as a DINO who stood in the way of progressivism. They made her out to be the second coming of Joe Lieberman.
We are now seeing what real conservative Democrats look like. I still can't believe that the liberal champion of the 1990s was successfully labeled that way.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)But fifteen is the only possible progressive number. Twelve, twelve-fifty, fourteen, sixteen. No, not progressive. Fifteen only. Plus, all the $15 plans are incremental, which now is suddenly fine but used to be a very, very bad terrible Democratic sin.
SunSeeker
(51,720 posts)Last edited Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:47 PM - Edit history (1)
Places like WV and rural AZ think $15/hour is a lot of money for an unskilled worker.
Marthe48
(17,031 posts)Thomas Hobbes
DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)First, the raise is to take place over a few years.
I live in an economically depressed area, right near the border of eastern Ohio and the northern WVa panhandle. Even here, starting wages are at or over $10/hr and some places like Walmart are starting employees at $12/hr and others like Aldi are close to it. In 2, 3, 4 years, starting wages are going to be near $15/hr.
When jobs pay better in PA, where does Sen Manchin think workers are going to go? They're going to cross the border and work in PA and probably shop there, too. Why wouldn't you want to keep your state's workers home, pay them better and have them spend their disposable income in local businesses to help your own state's economy?
Akoto
(4,267 posts)I 100% agree with raising the minimum wage, but the bill was difficult enough to get into consideration without tacking this historically controversial topic into the mix.
They should've held their fire to let the COVID relief pass ASAP, and then pushed for this in separate legislation. This is delaying vital assistance which will save lives.
MichMan
(11,976 posts)ChazII
(6,206 posts)for her views. Many are telling her not to be a traitor. Other messages remind her not to to be a Republican.
Jimbo S
(2,960 posts)The COVID situation is temporary, MW is permanent.
Ollie Garkie
(186 posts)Maybe including min wage in Covid bill is not the best idea, but Manchin and Sinema seem to be trying to willfully sabotage it. What is their deal? I envy the ability of repubs to March in lockstep.
Mr.Bill
(24,330 posts)Then when they dazzle us with their low unemployment rates and a booming economy caused by businesses rushing to move to their states to enjoy the prosperity resulting from below poverty level wages I will be the first to admit I was wrong.