Support for Third U.S. Political Party at High Point
Source: Gallup
FEBRUARY 15, 2021
BY JEFFREY M. JONES
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
62% say a third party is needed, up from 57% in September
Highest support for a third party by one percentage point
A record-high 63% of Republicans favor a third party
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Americans' desire for a third party has ticked up since last fall and now sits at a high in Gallup's trend. Sixty-two percent of U.S. adults say the "parties do such a poor job representing the American people that a third party is needed," an increase from 57% in September. Support for a third party has been elevated in recent years, including readings of 60% in 2013 and 2015 and 61% in 2017.
Meanwhile, 33% of Americans believe the two major political parties are doing an adequate job representing the public, the smallest percentage expressing this view apart from the 26% reading in October 2013.
The latest results are from a Jan. 21-Feb. 2 poll. The survey was conducted before recent news reports that dozens of government officials in prior Republican administrations were in discussions to form an anti-Donald Trump third political party.
The survey found Americans' favorable opinion of the Republican Party has declined to 37%, while 48% view the Democratic Party positively. The poll also shows 50% of U.S. adults identifying as political independents, the highest percentage Gallup has ever measured in a single poll.
Read more: https://news.gallup.com/poll/329639/support-third-political-party-high-point.aspx
Squinch
(51,084 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... in the same way that the "Green" party has the same effect on the Democrats.
Fact of the matter is, when it comes to national elections and governing, we have a defacto two-party system. Unless the current system changes, a "third" party will not be viable unless and until the party they hope to replace dissolves or collapses. In the meantime, the opposition party benefits.
Good luck to the Patriot party!
70sEraVet
(3,535 posts)When a Presidential candidate can be elected to office with less than 50% of the vote in a TWO-party system, going to a viable THREE-party system is like teaching chess to someone who can't grasp the rules of checkers!
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)It says that a "simple-majority single-ballot system favours the two-party system."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duverger's_law
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Thanks for the link.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,860 posts)... if they want the Trump family leading it.
And the nativism / xenophobia is similar to the old political party of that same name too.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Know_Nothing
bucolic_frolic
(43,478 posts)Patriot, Libertarian, Tea, QAnon on the right - let's see which can be popularize fascism while telling us they're something else.
DownriverDem
(6,236 posts)Let the repubs split up. They deserve all the lost elections to come. As a proud member of the Democratic Party, I will work to beat them big time.
myohmy2
(3,210 posts)...do you really want to see kumbaya between Dems and pukes?
...just start a 3rd Party...
...the one thing Dems and pukes would both totally agree upon, would be to join forces to fuck any 3rd Party any way they could...
...no, the pukes have to swirl around in the bowl for a while before they flush their big turds down...
...everyone's 3rd Party happy until it comes time to vote...
...sorry, that's the way it is in the U.S. of A...
ancianita
(36,219 posts)but don't think they won't wreck who and what they can. Their regrouping is no joke, folks.
There will be more "random" murders, more death threats, more @Trump War Room Big Lies and different lie machinery at work.
Using TV and the politics of personal destruction, they'll attack all Democratic candidates, and dragnet all THAT under Biden; whatever gets traction in 2022 will be used in the buildup to 2024.
If they can start a civil war again, they will.
Cybersecurity and the grid will have to further harden up.
hay rick
(7,662 posts)American politics is drowning in all the fear-mongering that money can buy. Many people claim the "independent" tag as a concession to the avoidance-avoidance conflict that results when political parties and candidates are more easily demonized than understood. "Independent" voters are less likely to vote than either Republicans or Democrats. The majority can also be safely categorized as Democratic-leaning or Republican-leaning.
marie999
(3,334 posts)Then the House elects the president and the Senate elects the vice-president. That of course is if that 3rd party can actually win some states. That means if one party gets 5 votes and the other 2 parties split the votes evenly, the party that got 5 votes could be elected.
IronLionZion
(45,630 posts)since the Republican party has fallen off the cliff into authoritarian fascism.
Initech
(100,139 posts)Bucky
(54,094 posts)Follow the leader is a Republican game. That's why maverick light from South Carolina crawled so far up Trump's caboose. All of them but Romney did, frankly.
There's simply no interest in forming a third party on the right.
J Magarac
(73 posts)... unless you count "insignificant" as a tendency.
Libertarian Party, Socialist Workers Party, Green Party, Constitution Party, yadda yadda yadda.
There's even still a Prohibitionist Party.
And a Communist Party properly self so called.
we could take a cue from our Constitution and have no political parties whatsoever. In the Cyber Age, there are vastly better alternatives!
Bucky
(54,094 posts)It's a natural tendency. George Washington didn't want them, but they formed up in the first Congress informally and were locked in was names and formal affiliations before John Adams left office. The process of creating laws and policies produces party affiliations as naturally as warm and cold fronts produce rain
TeamPooka
(24,292 posts)hahahahahahahahahahaha
Hiawatha Pete
(1,809 posts)PatrickforO
(14,604 posts)We are at 48% approval, and Gallup tends to skew a bit right.
As to a third party, it implies that would be a far-right leaning Republican Trumpist party, a centrist? Republican party, and the Democrats.
That would be great.
Right now, it looks like Biden is going to shape up as a transformative New Deal kind of president, and we need to keep that going. If the GOP splits, it will be good for us. If we split, not so much.
Remember folks, we need more common sense, and less ideology. Our government should work for us. The things Biden is doing and wants to do, are GOOD POLICY in a pragmatic sense, though the right wing noise machine describes them as 'far left.' The last thing we need is to have some kind of split.
orleans
(34,094 posts)the q party
the trumplican party
the insurrectionists
whatever....
perhaps all
split, chop, mince, dice up the "republican" vote
The Mouth
(3,169 posts)A left, a center, and a right.
at a minimum.
Let the people, left or right, who care about ideological purity have their parties and those who just care about streets, schools, and don't mind paying reasonable taxes that give us what we pay for, etc, have the center.
keopeli
(3,527 posts)We have a very large party (Dems) right now with a wide array of ideologies and 50% of the population declared as Independent.
If a real Centrist party springs up, there will be many, MANY people who are voting Dem right now that will quickly switch to voting centrist. A new, centrist party could EASILY become the dominant party in just a couple of election cycles.
Lesson: be careful what you wish for...
AZ8theist
(5,531 posts)The "new" party would be a conservative one, formed to split conventional Republicans from the cult of Doturd Fascists.
While they would draw some from the independent center, they would effectively divide the current American Nazi party (Republicans) into two groups: Those who support fascism (the Trumpanzees) and Rockefeller Republicans. Each part would command, at most, 30% of the electorate.
This will ensure Democratic control of the government for generations to come.
Bucky
(54,094 posts)The problem is that mainstream Democratic party is already that govern-from-the-middle party you're worried about.
And sadly the govern from the middle philosophy tends to produce politicians who don't rock the boat and don't produce inventive solutions to evolving modern problems.
In the end, a moderate party would wither away. If people are voting on purely ideological views on a two-dimensional spectrum, a moderate party would draw about 15% of Republicans and 10% of Democrats. In a majoritarian, first past the post democracy like we have, they would be squeezed out like Ross Perot in short order.
Bucky
(54,094 posts)The numbers of people who want there to be a third party are diffused among those wanting more moderate, liberal, left radical, right radical, libertarian, and old school Republican views being represented.