Majority dissatisfied with US gun laws, policies: poll
Source: The Hill
BY JORDAN WILLIAMS - 02/19/21 09:32 AM EST
A majority of Americans are dissatisfied with gun laws and policies in the U.S., according to a Gallup poll released on Friday.
The survey of 547 adults found that 56 percent say they are dissatisfied with U.S. gun laws and policies, compared to 42 percent who say they are satisfied with gun laws.
Sixty-nine percent of Republicans or Republican-leaning independents are more satisfied with U.S. gun laws, while 22 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents say they are satisfied with gun laws.
In addition, 41 percent of the public say they are dissatisfied with current gun laws and want them to be stricter, while 8 percent say they are dissatisfied and want them less strict and 7 percent are dissatisfied but want them to remain the same.
Poll: Overwhelming majority say unemployment is a problem
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/news/539548-majority-dissatisfied-with-us-gun-laws-policies-poll
samsingh
(17,593 posts)see Texas for what happens when republicans are left in charge.
and cruz for how invested repugs are in helping those fools who vote repug.
LiberalArkie
(15,703 posts)In the south the majority is not happy with current laws. The majority believe that their should not be any laws or policies concerning firearms at all.
Turin_C3PO
(13,912 posts)its clear that a large majority of Americans support sensible gun control including the assault weapons ban and universal background checks.
LiberalArkie
(15,703 posts)don't "touch my firearms". Since they have all the hunting weapons and toys like the ar-15 etc. They only thing I can think they might want controlled are tanks and missiles.
Polybius
(15,337 posts)The 40% who oppose gun laws vote, which is why we can never pass another assault weapons bill.
pandr32
(11,562 posts)?????????
What would you call that group?
Gore1FL
(21,104 posts)"I hate how things are but change is scary" is a weird way to live life.
Why fix broken things? Mend relationships? Try a new tack?
These people aren't even bothering to function as citizens at all--good or bad.
Evolve Dammit
(16,702 posts)pandr32
(11,562 posts)BlueWavePsych
(2,635 posts)oldsoftie
(12,492 posts)And we already know how well those laws work.
All in favor of red flag laws though. As long as there are protections in place to prevent abuse by a disgruntled person.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)pandr32
(11,562 posts)Hunting rifles and shotguns are often in households for hunting and security. There are cougars and bear. My mom shot a bear once.
Our dad taught us how to shoot when we were children and insisted we respect guns to the point of not allowing us to point our toy pistols at each other in play--instead point and shoot at imaginary outlaws. If we did point at anyone real he would take our toy cap pistols away. It never happened because we teamed up and went after our imaginary enemies.
We (family) kept a shotgun at the door of the house (for security) full of first--salt, and then bird shot. Our dad was pretty sure nobody would continue to try to come in uninvited after the salt. We all knew how to use it.
Why do people want handguns?
roamer65
(36,744 posts)Very few complied and I think it was eventually ended.
Handguns are a whole different beast.
pandr32
(11,562 posts)I don't have a problem with legal registry of guns, but obviously many people do.
Handguns "are a whole different beast" and so are military style semi-automatic weapons.
twodogsbarking
(9,680 posts)partly due to misinformation, mostly on purpose. News sources sensationalize it. Free press isn't always true press.
PSPS
(13,580 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)If the Democrats want a meaningful majority in the Senate we have to win in pro-gun states. Look no further than the failure of the AWB after Sandy Hook - it was a Democratic lead Senate that killed it.
azureblue
(2,145 posts)could be addressed by initiating a simple proficiency for purpose test. IOW, stationery or moving target proficiency. Much like a road test for a driver's license.
I would prefer additional training, like if you are buying a firearm for home defense then you should be trained on how to use it for that purpose, and trained under stress. If you are buying a firearm for hunting ducks then a simple round of skeet shooting should do.
In my experience, the nut cases don't want to wait and go through practical testing and a lot of them are lousy shots anyway.
Evolve Dammit
(16,702 posts)oldsoftie
(12,492 posts)I dont know about Canada, but in the US there are tens of millions of handguns. Making them illegal wont do a thing. The cows out of the barn. Its like banning nukes. You never REALLY know if everyone destroyed ALL of them.
Evolve Dammit
(16,702 posts)Historically, bans on various things perceived to be a threat to the public were cracked down on. In this case, why does anyone need high capacity magazines and semi-auto to hunt (other than people)?
jorgevlorgan
(8,281 posts)Ban the fucking guns, stop the bloodshed.
roamer65
(36,744 posts)Semi-automatics should be highly restricted or banned for some models.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 20, 2021, 09:30 AM - Edit history (1)
which is why it did not play a major role in the last election. Voters want it but it is not a make or break issue for most so Dem candidates play it safe and ignore the issue in all but the most Democratic states.