Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(61,845 posts)
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 01:25 PM Feb 2021

Oath Keeper claims she was VIP security at Trump rally before riot and says she met with Secret Serv

Source: CNN

Oath Keeper claims she was VIP security at Trump rally before riot and says she met with Secret Service agents



A leader in an alleged Oath Keepers conspiracy in the US Capitol insurrection claims she was given a VIP pass to the pro-Trump rally on January 6, had met with Secret Service agents and was providing security for legislators and others, including in their march to the Capitol, according to a new court filing.

Attorneys for Ohio Oath Keeper Jessica Watkins detail how the efforts among paramilitants who are now accused of conspiracy on January 6 were closer to the apparatus around then-President Donald Trump and his rally than was previously known.

-snip-

"On January 5 and 6, Ms. Watkins was present not as an insurrectionist, but to provide security to the speakers at the rally, to provide escort for the legislators and others to march to the Capitol as directed by the then-President, and to safely escort protestors away from the Capitol to their vehicles and cars at the conclusion of the protest," the court filing said on Saturday. "She was given a VIP pass to the rally. She met with Secret Service agents. She was within 50 feet of the stage during the rally to provide security for the speakers. At the time the Capitol was breached, she was still at the sight of the initial rally where she had provided security."

-snip-

Watkins' defense attorney, Michelle Peterson, wrote on Saturday that her client and other supporters of Trump had believed the then-President would invoke the Insurrection Act to use the military to overturn what he falsely said was the fraudulent election of Joe Biden. And Watkins and others believed "they would have a role if this were to happen," the filing said.

-snip-



Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/21/politics/oath-keepers-vip-security-capitol-riot/index.html



Much more at the link.
132 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oath Keeper claims she was VIP security at Trump rally before riot and says she met with Secret Serv (Original Post) highplainsdem Feb 2021 OP
I believe her jpak Feb 2021 #1
Her story fits with all the other puzzle pieces. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #22
You got me. Was going to post a "you are shitting me" post and saw the emoji laughing at me. grantcart Feb 2021 #43
Glad it wasn't just me. H2O Man Feb 2021 #68
Found this story thanks to a tweet from Manu Raju 20 minutes ago: highplainsdem Feb 2021 #2
"to provide escort for the legislators and others to march to the Capitol" Botany Feb 2021 #3
Trump and his flying monkeys can do whatever they want it appears. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #24
Trump gave 'em the Botany Feb 2021 #71
And marching orders: Kill Pence. And any other MOC you can find. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #78
Trump wanted more death and or bloodshed so he could declare martial law in order to .... Botany Feb 2021 #103
Yes that is the way it is looking. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #105
WOW! What a story! blueinredohio Feb 2021 #4
Too bad for her that the Military basically told Trump to fuck off MarineCombatEngineer Feb 2021 #5
Flynn and his active duty military brother had other plans. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #28
Jessica Watkins, in military gear, was seen on video taking part in the uprising at the Capitol. Goonch Feb 2021 #6
It wasn't that long ago that we'd just assume somebody in that get-up was mentally ill greenjar_01 Feb 2021 #13
Giant cosplay for would be terrorists.... diverdownjt Feb 2021 #25
According to the article she is transgender.... reACTIONary Feb 2021 #40
I fail to see what being trans has to do with her choice to be a domestic terrorist. moriah Feb 2021 #54
The comment is addressed to the notion that this was reACTIONary Feb 2021 #95
Trans is immaterial VA_Jill Feb 2021 #64
The comment is adressed to the notion that this was reACTIONary Feb 2021 #93
It doesn't matter VA_Jill Feb 2021 #98
Do you think she is.. reACTIONary Feb 2021 #102
I never said anything of the sort. Jilly_in_VA Feb 2021 #109
So I guess we agree... reACTIONary Feb 2021 #117
She's a naive cosplay wannabe even if she led a Ranger battalion in the damn Korangal greenjar_01 Feb 2021 #131
She has the training to be deadly. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #106
u are too kind Cryptoad Feb 2021 #31
100% stopdiggin Feb 2021 #65
She belongs to the militant arm of the Furries. BobTheSubgenius Feb 2021 #74
Acording to the artcle she is a former... reACTIONary Feb 2021 #38
Probably more stolen valor like Tom Cotton. Army Ranger school is open to all members but that Pepsidog Feb 2021 #59
Army Ranger School is not open to all members Yeehah Feb 2021 #82
Well I am no expert, just repeating what I read in Rolling Stone Mag article that said: Pepsidog Feb 2021 #89
The article is embarrassingly uninformed nonsense Yeehah Feb 2021 #118
Thanks for the clarification. Pepsidog Feb 2021 #120
Thanks for the info..... reACTIONary Feb 2021 #100
Always turn on your smell test machine when reading sarge43 Feb 2021 #115
Same with science and technology reporting... reACTIONary Feb 2021 #121
The NY Times classic back in 20's sarge43 Feb 2021 #125
LOL +100 Made my day nt reACTIONary Feb 2021 #128
You could be right... I'm just quoting the article. nt reACTIONary Feb 2021 #97
and still -- total nutjob -- living in la-la land stopdiggin Feb 2021 #60
Gen Michael Flynn and Gen Benedict Arnold both started out as patriots who served their country well keithbvadu2 Feb 2021 #72
The subthread to your post has at least 4 people dismissing her outfit as cosplay. People DIED... Hekate Feb 2021 #73
Pelosi's 9/11-style investigation of this well-orchestrated attempted Capitol coup will shock many. sop Feb 2021 #7
Yes I agree, we are beginning to connect all the dots. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #29
+1 Agreed. c-rational Feb 2021 #47
This somewhat corroborates that very early CNN report that the insurrectionists Mike 03 Feb 2021 #8
These idiots fancy themselves experts on government or something greenjar_01 Feb 2021 #12
It is clear now that Trump and others did exactly that, enlist help from these so called militia Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #32
provide security was the relevant phrase (nt) stopdiggin Feb 2021 #67
Exactly. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #77
Would like to know what organization "contracted" stopdiggin Feb 2021 #81
At least a 50/50 chance she is telling the truth. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #83
Well, thankfully -- we now have some pretty sharp people stopdiggin Feb 2021 #87
JWatkins et al were just useful idiots. But some of them have important information. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #96
The flaw in the logic bottomofthehill Feb 2021 #20
trump was communicating to "dangerous psychos" & used them as his pawns, his little toy soldiers. nt AnotherMother4Peace Feb 2021 #27
Yes he used them in his plan to declare martial law. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #33
Of course. He always thought they are suckers and losers since Vietnam. Justice matters. Feb 2021 #56
He only admires other dictator sociopaths like Putin and Kim Jong-un. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #57
STUPID ..... never, never trust the Bastard....you be going to jail sweetie ashredux Feb 2021 #9
I think Jessica Watkins is a bit greenjar_01 Feb 2021 #10
Yes but her story meshes with other reports and the facts. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #35
QUESTION. Was she armed? Grasswire2 Feb 2021 #11
Am going to UpInArms Feb 2021 #14
Am I reading that correctly? Docreed2003 Feb 2021 #23
Am trying to figure out how we have UpInArms Feb 2021 #49
She met with Secret Service agents. mezame Feb 2021 #15
I hope she will cough up names. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #36
"Howdy -- Jessica, from Ohio -- here to hep' you guys!" stopdiggin Feb 2021 #70
The imaginary ones greenjar_01 Feb 2021 #132
Well that would take the Presidency to a new art form bucolic_frolic Feb 2021 #16
He didn't need a fake Antifa. Dead Pence, Pelosi and other MOC, that is all he needed. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #37
Yeah, I guess if you get to that point you don't need to sort sides bucolic_frolic Feb 2021 #62
Right, high level dead bodies, all he needed. The Capitol Police outplayed him though. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #76
It certainly sounds like something Ghouliani in a drunken stupor would concoct. erronis Feb 2021 #58
His children were in the tent with him along with lapdancer. keithbvadu2 Feb 2021 #126
They can explain all the way if they want .............they still have Blood On There Hands turbinetree Feb 2021 #17
Others have made these observations matt819 Feb 2021 #18
Martial law, Trump inaugurated as President. Flynn had some military backing. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #39
Martial law doesn't suspend the Constitution- Trump couldn't have been lawfully inaugurated. Nt Fiendish Thingy Feb 2021 #46
Yes of course, but Trump never ever lets the law stop him. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #48
Don't get it.... ewagner Feb 2021 #55
Seth Abramson & Bob Cesca tweets on Alex Jones's role: highplainsdem Feb 2021 #19
More dots being connected. A lot more people involved than we knew. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #41
Pic from the morning of January 6 UpInArms Feb 2021 #51
Roger Stone has a face badly in need of a fist. My gods look at his expression. Hekate Feb 2021 #91
My hope is he dies a miserable death UpInArms Feb 2021 #116
Trump incites an insurrection so he can declare marital law. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #21
Following you thru this thread, I think we are on the same page... Hekate Feb 2021 #92
Yes we are facts pulling us in many directions. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #104
The Capitol Riot was an inside job! Pass it on! Initech Feb 2021 #26
Yes it is looking like this is the case. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #42
Believing it doesn't make it true. nt IronLionZion Feb 2021 #30
Some of what's she's spouting might be true... paleotn Feb 2021 #34
Trump counted on them being full of themselves. He played into their delusions. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #52
I'd say it's time for some "advanced interrogation" of this individual, at an Progressive Jones Feb 2021 #44
She is afraid of prison time. I think she will talk. She also thinks she was doing the right thing. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #50
She's regurgitating Qanon bullshit sobenji Feb 2021 #45
KnR to read whole thing later. I hope the FBI "befriends" her and that she talks and talks and talks Hekate Feb 2021 #53
Many MAGA Rats are actually talking... Justice matters. Feb 2021 #61
Traito scum. Lock them Up! Evolve Dammit Feb 2021 #63
K&R for visibility Blue Owl Feb 2021 #66
Merrick Garland is going to be very busy. nt SunSeeker Feb 2021 #69
"Merrick Garland will tell senators on Monday that he will fight discrimination and domestic sop Feb 2021 #79
Is he a guaranteed confirmation? ancianita Feb 2021 #80
He should be. Manchin has not objected to him. SunSeeker Feb 2021 #90
Good. I hadn't read anything but didn't want to be complacent. ancianita Feb 2021 #94
I Think If All Democrats Support Him, Yes COL Mustard Feb 2021 #110
Hope so. ancianita Feb 2021 #111
Sorry, I Was Referring To Garland, Not Manchin COL Mustard Feb 2021 #112
Okay. ancianita Feb 2021 #114
Yup, I Agree With You COL Mustard Feb 2021 #122
Along with several of you, keithsw Feb 2021 #75
Yes. ancianita Feb 2021 #84
She is full of shit. Says she was forced to quit Army when they found out she was transgender. we can do it Feb 2021 #85
Exaggerated self-importance, if you ask me. louis-t Feb 2021 #86
I believe Trump and his pals played into their delusional thinking. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #108
delusions of grandeur. (nt) apnu Feb 2021 #88
Exactly. orangecrush Feb 2021 #124
Guess it sounds different coming from stillcool Feb 2021 #99
is it possible that idiots ss detail gave her clearance... dawn5651 Feb 2021 #101
That is an important question I would like answered. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #107
Reminds me of when the Rolling Stones hired the Hell's Angels as security for Altamont LongtimeAZDem Feb 2021 #113
Is this like Altamont when the Rolling Stones asked the Hells Angels BigmanPigman Feb 2021 #119
The Secret Service called bullshit on her claims. orangecrush Feb 2021 #123
Let's see the VIP pass. keithbvadu2 Feb 2021 #127
So her defense is that she believed the lies 45 fed her intheflow Feb 2021 #129
Another nutcase Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2021 #130

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
22. Her story fits with all the other puzzle pieces.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:17 PM
Feb 2021

Which continue to give us a better picture of what happened.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
43. You got me. Was going to post a "you are shitting me" post and saw the emoji laughing at me.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:43 PM
Feb 2021

She could even believe it herself as delusional as she is.

Botany

(77,210 posts)
3. "to provide escort for the legislators and others to march to the Capitol"
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 01:30 PM
Feb 2021

The permit for the rally was for ONLY the area by the White House where Trump had his rally.
It was limited to that area ONLY.

Botany

(77,210 posts)
71. Trump gave 'em the
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 04:15 PM
Feb 2021

Time

Place

Date

along with paying for the rally (campaign funds) and decapitating the D.C. National Guard too.

Botany

(77,210 posts)
103. Trump wanted more death and or bloodshed so he could declare martial law in order to ....
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:12 PM
Feb 2021

.... stay in power.

Trump Reportedly Bullied Pence: You Can Be a Patriot ‘or a Pussy.’

Trump was and is now scared about what would happen to him after he was no longer President. He knows that he
and his family have broken a shit ton of laws and needs protection.

MarineCombatEngineer

(18,051 posts)
5. Too bad for her that the Military basically told Trump to fuck off
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 01:33 PM
Feb 2021

if he tried to use the Insurrection Act to get involved in the election process.

Goonch

(4,937 posts)
6. Jessica Watkins, in military gear, was seen on video taking part in the uprising at the Capitol.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 01:36 PM
Feb 2021
 

greenjar_01

(6,477 posts)
13. It wasn't that long ago that we'd just assume somebody in that get-up was mentally ill
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 01:56 PM
Feb 2021

This is a costume, let's be clear. Ms. Watkins was not engaged in any military action that day. She was dressed up in a ridiculous costume, and mistook the costume world for reality. It's no different than somebody dressing up as a gorilla and actually believing themselves to be a gorilla. She needs mental health assistance.

diverdownjt

(737 posts)
25. Giant cosplay for would be terrorists....
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:20 PM
Feb 2021

All hat no cattle says it all for me...it would be easier to show some cleavage w/o that metal plate in the way.
You know cosplay style...although do I really want to see that..........nope!

reACTIONary

(7,149 posts)
40. According to the article she is transgender....
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:41 PM
Feb 2021

... and served in Afghanistan as an Army Ranger. A bit more serious than cosplay.

moriah

(8,312 posts)
54. I fail to see what being trans has to do with her choice to be a domestic terrorist.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 03:12 PM
Feb 2021

I am all for these terrorists having attorneys, for them to have reasonable conditions in jail, etc. (And she needs a better attorney if they equate gender identity with sexual orientation as in the pleadings, though I have no idea what caused her separation from service).

I am not for saying that somehow because she is trans that this makes one iota of difference in her choosing to join a domestic terrorist organization and actively recruit "able bodied Patriots" to "fight, kill, and die" for Trump.

And ever since they stole the term "LARPing" to refer to real-world trolling instead of goth geeks occupying a mall or outdoor shopping center for an evening pretending to be vampires pretending to be people (yes those were my teen years), while I get that these are domestic terrorists and not SCA/Ren Faire people so calling it "cosplay" may seem to diminish the real threat, if their intent was not to "fight, kill, and die" they WOULD be ridiculous.

reACTIONary

(7,149 posts)
95. The comment is addressed to the notion that this was
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:02 PM
Feb 2021

The comment is addressed to the notion that this was cosplay and not serious. If she was male as an Army Ranger in Afghanistan, she may have seen combat. So she is not a naïve cosplay wanna be.

reACTIONary

(7,149 posts)
93. The comment is adressed to the notion that this was
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:00 PM
Feb 2021

... Cosplay and not serious. If she was male as an Army Ranger in Afghanistan, she may have seen combat. So she is not a naïve cosplay wanna be.

VA_Jill

(14,343 posts)
98. It doesn't matter
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:04 PM
Feb 2021

what she was as an Army ranger (and incidentally, if she is trans now, she was pretty much always trans, she just wasn't acting on it, but I'm not getting into an argument with you here) is immaterial...she may or may not have been "out" trans then. What is material is the TREASON. Forget the rest of it.

reACTIONary

(7,149 posts)
102. Do you think she is..
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:11 PM
Feb 2021

... "all hat and no cattle"? I think she knew what she was doing, knew how to do it, and was dangerous.

And treasonous.

Jilly_in_VA

(14,343 posts)
109. I never said anything of the sort.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:32 PM
Feb 2021

I said what was important about her was the TREASON. And trans is immaterial. What about that do you not get? She is a TREASONOUS POS and should be treated as such.

reACTIONary

(7,149 posts)
117. So I guess we agree...
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 07:48 PM
Feb 2021

.... "All hat no cattle" was from the post I was replying to originally. See https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142699941#post25

I was disagreeing with that assessment. I don't think she is all hat and no cattle. The reason that I mentioned that she is trans is that it opens the possibility that she was engaged in actual combat in Afghanistan. That is relevant to whether or not she is or isn't all hat and no cattle.

 

greenjar_01

(6,477 posts)
131. She's a naive cosplay wannabe even if she led a Ranger battalion in the damn Korangal
Mon Feb 22, 2021, 04:59 PM
Feb 2021

There was not a military action going on on January 6. She was in costume like a clown.

stopdiggin

(15,381 posts)
65. 100%
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 03:51 PM
Feb 2021

unfortunately -- with the prevalence of alternative facts, and alternate realities -- I'm not sure if the "illness" label still works. But this is 'dress up' -- and fantasy -- and as we have come to find out, 'delusion.'

BobTheSubgenius

(12,211 posts)
74. She belongs to the militant arm of the Furries.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 04:18 PM
Feb 2021

You have an awesome life when you can live your cosplay 24/7/365.

reACTIONary

(7,149 posts)
38. Acording to the artcle she is a former...
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:38 PM
Feb 2021

... Army Ranger, served in Afghanistan, and is transgender.

She might have more going for her than just cosplay.

Pepsidog

(6,362 posts)
59. Probably more stolen valor like Tom Cotton. Army Ranger school is open to all members but that
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 03:35 PM
Feb 2021

Last edited Sun Feb 21, 2021, 05:48 PM - Edit history (1)

makes you Ranger ready, not a part of the active regiment of fighting Rangers.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/tom-cotton-army-ranger-school-1118418/

Yeehah

(6,422 posts)
82. Army Ranger School is not open to all members
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 04:45 PM
Feb 2021

That statement is laughably untrue.

Ms. Watkins did not complete Ranger School, but reportedly did complete the much easier Airborne School. In which case, she was likely an enlisted member (as a male) of a Ranger battalion, who had not completed Ranger School. She served about three months overseas, from what I've read. All soldiers assigned to a Ranger battalion must graduate Ranger School or they will be assigned elsewhere.

Pepsidog

(6,362 posts)
89. Well I am no expert, just repeating what I read in Rolling Stone Mag article that said:
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 05:39 PM
Feb 2021
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/tom-cotton-army-ranger-school-1118418/“The U.S. Army Ranger Course, on the other hand, which Cotton did attend, is described as “the Army’s premier leadership school” and is “open to all members of the military.” A school literally anyone in the military can attend is a far cry from the RASP, which the Army says is “designed to test a Soldier’s physical and mental strength under extreme conditions”.

]https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/tom-cotton-army-ranger-school-1118418/

Yeehah

(6,422 posts)
118. The article is embarrassingly uninformed nonsense
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 08:09 PM
Feb 2021

RASP is a short course for soldiers who are assigned to the Ranger Regiment who have not completed Ranger School. Anyone who wants to remain in the Ranger Regiment must complete Ranger School or they will be assigned elsewhere. RASP is not easy but Ranger School is more difficult, and many soldiers who complete RASP do not graduate Ranger School.

Soldiers must be selected to attend Ranger School. You will not be selected unless you are in a specialty that requires small unit tactics (generally infantry and special forces) and you are in top physical condition, and you are recommended by your commander. This is a very small fraction of the military. Ranger School is “open to all members of the military,” as the public affairs person stated, but so is the Ranger Regiment. Anyone can ask for either one. But only a few actually get to go.

It is misleading for a soldier to refer to themself an "Army Ranger" if they did not serve in the Ranger Regiment, but is technically not a lie. Cotton is guilty of aggradizement but not a mistruth.

I hate Cotton and want to see him go down in flames, but this uninformed article is just as misleading as Cotton's claim to "service as an Army Ranger."

reACTIONary

(7,149 posts)
100. Thanks for the info.....
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:07 PM
Feb 2021

.... I was quoting the article; I have no other knowledge of military affairs.

sarge43

(29,173 posts)
115. Always turn on your smell test machine when reading
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 07:32 PM
Feb 2021

civilian newspaper articles concerning anything martial.

Almost guaranteed at least one faux pas. Confusing rank vs duty title, type of discharge: An Other Than Honorable is not the same as a Dishonorable, because two individual's rank is called the same, both have the same pay grade: There are nine enlisted pay grades in the US service and it's the pay grade that determines your place in the pecking order, not the name. The Army, Marine Corps and Air Force have the rank master sergeant. Army and Marines MSG have the pay grade of E-8, Air Force E-7. Guess who pecks whom. An Army captain (O-3) does not exist in the same universe as a Navy captain (O-6).

reACTIONary

(7,149 posts)
121. Same with science and technology reporting...
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 09:20 PM
Feb 2021

... even with reporters who specialize in those topics.

sarge43

(29,173 posts)
125. The NY Times classic back in 20's
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 10:33 PM
Feb 2021

Its 'science' editor in an article about Goddard's rocket tests stated that rockets would never work in outer space because the propellant would have nothing to push against.

Following Apollo 11's success the Times did allow that the then science editor was probably wrong.

stopdiggin

(15,381 posts)
60. and still -- total nutjob -- living in la-la land
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 03:44 PM
Feb 2021

And ..... Mike Flynn is a whack job too. Wearing a uniforrn does not inoculate people from bizarro, and the ridiculous.

I'll stick with cosplay here -- and be willing to bet that a lot of service people (current and former) would back me up.

keithbvadu2

(40,915 posts)
72. Gen Michael Flynn and Gen Benedict Arnold both started out as patriots who served their country well
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 04:16 PM
Feb 2021

Gen Michael Flynn and Gen Benedict Arnold both started out as patriots who served their country well.

Arnold died a traitor in England.

He was not lucky enough to have a Donald Trump on his side.

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
73. The subthread to your post has at least 4 people dismissing her outfit as cosplay. People DIED...
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 04:16 PM
Feb 2021

...at our national Capitol, and dozens of cops were maimed, including one who had his eyes gouged out. Participants brought various flags attached to heavy rods and spears so they were ready made weapons.

There were no doubt some floating in la-la land, like the “shaman,” but hundreds came in various uniforms to make them identifiable to their friends, worked in unison, and in all ways behaved like an army. Some of the uniforms were Proud Boys jackets, and some were US military surplus down to the helmets and protective eyewear.

They came seeking violence. They came bringing violence. Many were trained by the US military and American police departments. How far does this go?

Yet for whatever reason that I cannot fathom, participant Jessica Watkins with her military training and military gear is dismissed, up to and including the comment that her uniform doesn’t show her cleavage. What the everloving fck is that about?


sop

(18,477 posts)
7. Pelosi's 9/11-style investigation of this well-orchestrated attempted Capitol coup will shock many.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 01:42 PM
Feb 2021

I hope they follow the money trail, and the DOJ prosecutes those responsible.

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
29. Yes I agree, we are beginning to connect all the dots.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:31 PM
Feb 2021

And it is not a pretty picture.

Mike 03

(18,690 posts)
8. This somewhat corroborates that very early CNN report that the insurrectionists
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 01:46 PM
Feb 2021

were expressing rage on Parler at Trump because they were anticipating specific instructions/orders that never arrived. The upset Parler users were saying: They'd been told something would happen that day once they arrived at the Capitol, but it didn't happen. Some also expressed that they believed Trump actually was walking with them to the Capitol.

her client and other supporters of Trump had believed the then-President would invoke the Insurrection Act to use the military to overturn what he falsely said was the fraudulent election of Joe Biden


That was reported on CNN (broadcast, a verbal report) in the first day or two after the insurrection. Then I never heard any more about it. At the time, it sounded like evidence of conspiracy, or a rumor that got out of control.
 

greenjar_01

(6,477 posts)
12. These idiots fancy themselves experts on government or something
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 01:53 PM
Feb 2021

The US government doesn't randomly and without explicit contract enlist dipshits from Ohio to provide security for anything.

It's so exhausting having to deal with this adolescent nonsense from grown people constantly.

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
32. It is clear now that Trump and others did exactly that, enlist help from these so called militia
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:32 PM
Feb 2021

group. To form an insurrection mob.

stopdiggin

(15,381 posts)
81. Would like to know what organization "contracted"
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 04:45 PM
Feb 2021

with Jessica Watkins (or her Ohio militia group) to provide 'security' -- at either the Mall, or the Capital. I'd be interesting to see a copy of that ... Or indeed any type of official 'coordination' between legitimate security and military (SS, NG, Capital police, etc.) with these outside wanna-be pretenders.

But I don't think it happened.
Watkins story, for Jan 6 and running up to it, is mostly a delusional flight of fancy.

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
83. At least a 50/50 chance she is telling the truth.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 04:51 PM
Feb 2021

Too many other pieces of the puzzle supporting her account.

I am trained as a scientist, and I follow the data.
The data is adding up to something very sinister.

stopdiggin

(15,381 posts)
87. Well, thankfully -- we now have some pretty sharp people
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 05:12 PM
Feb 2021

zeroing in on the scent. (and countering -- an awful lot of the "conspirators" that are obviously not the sharpest knives ... attempting to bury communications and such.) Our national security guys are pretty good at this stuff. So -- I'd say there's a pretty good chance that we will find out.

Your idea that something sinister took place is not that far fetched. I'm just contending that JWatkins (and her little band of merry thieves) had little to do with it. NOT the people I'd be counting on to plan my insurrection ....

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
96. JWatkins et al were just useful idiots. But some of them have important information.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:03 PM
Feb 2021

Yes if we can start putting dots together, certainly so can the CIA and FBI.

bottomofthehill

(9,381 posts)
20. The flaw in the logic
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:13 PM
Feb 2021

There needed to be insurrection, that she would be a part of, in order for the insurrection act to be invoked. Therefore she is admitting to insurrection. She was a willing pawn, and one that took part in an armed insurrection. Fuck her, try her, convict Lt her and incarcerate this little toy soldier for a long time. She is a dangerous psycho

AnotherMother4Peace

(5,110 posts)
27. trump was communicating to "dangerous psychos" & used them as his pawns, his little toy soldiers. nt
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:23 PM
Feb 2021

Justice matters.

(9,741 posts)
56. Of course. He always thought they are suckers and losers since Vietnam.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 03:31 PM
Feb 2021
And DURING Vietnam! Of course these loonies would not believe that fact.

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
57. He only admires other dictator sociopaths like Putin and Kim Jong-un.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 03:32 PM
Feb 2021

The rest of us are all losers.

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
35. Yes but her story meshes with other reports and the facts.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:34 PM
Feb 2021

She was crazy enough to become a flying monkey for Trump.
But sane enough to tell us the truth about what happened.

Grasswire2

(13,849 posts)
11. QUESTION. Was she armed?
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 01:51 PM
Feb 2021

Because if not, how in hell was she going to provide the security she says was her responsibility?

If she wasn't armed, she's lying.

If she was the only one, pffffffffffffft.

UpInArms

(54,894 posts)
14. Am going to
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 01:57 PM
Feb 2021

Have to call BS on this part:

Prosecutors previously said Watkins had waited for direction from Trump -- and believed she had received it before she joined the siege, allegedly leading several others into the Capitol building to fight against Congress' certification of the Electoral College vote.

Watkins' defense attorney, Michelle Peterson, wrote on Saturday that her client and other supporters of Trump had believed the then-President would invoke the Insurrection Act to use the military to overturn what he falsely said was the fraudulent election of Joe Biden. And Watkins and others believed "they would have a role if this were to happen," the filing said.

"However misguided, her intentions were not in any way related to an intention to overthrow the government, but to support what she believed to be the lawful government. She took an oath to support the Constitution and had no intention of violating that oath or of committing any violent acts."

Watkins' attorney argued in the filing her client had worn tactical gear potentially to defend herself, and walked up the Capitol steps with other Oath Keepers in a "stack" formation because the group may have wanted to stay together in the crowd.


Eta picturs:



Docreed2003

(18,714 posts)
23. Am I reading that correctly?
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:17 PM
Feb 2021

Her lawyer is arguing that she "took an Oath to protect the Constitution" and, in her mind, beecause she was doing that she's simply "misguided" and she was upholding her view of "lawful government".

What a crock of crap!!

UpInArms

(54,894 posts)
49. Am trying to figure out how we have
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:57 PM
Feb 2021
two governments

her intentions were not in any way related to an intention to overthrow the government, but to support what she believed to be the lawful government.

bucolic_frolic

(54,972 posts)
16. Well that would take the Presidency to a new art form
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:00 PM
Feb 2021

Invoking the Insurrection Act, used to deploy US military and National Guard troop to suppress rebellion, unrest, or insurrection, to instead suppress the actions of Congress and support his self-induced insurrection!

It is such a good thing progressives stayed home and didn't give him a chance to test fly that rocket.

I am quite surprised Trump didn't supply his own Antifa to complete the circuit.

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
37. He didn't need a fake Antifa. Dead Pence, Pelosi and other MOC, that is all he needed.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:38 PM
Feb 2021

He could declare martial law then.

bucolic_frolic

(54,972 posts)
62. Yeah, I guess if you get to that point you don't need to sort sides
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 03:48 PM
Feb 2021

The unrest and rebellion is already underway.

And we are only saved because his agents failed. He wasn't even any good at insurrection!

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
76. Right, high level dead bodies, all he needed. The Capitol Police outplayed him though.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 04:27 PM
Feb 2021

By minutes. It was a miracle he did not win.

erronis

(23,722 posts)
58. It certainly sounds like something Ghouliani in a drunken stupor would concoct.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 03:33 PM
Feb 2021

But just like all the chicken-hawks of W's regime (Cheney, Rumsfeld, Woo, Ashcroft, etc.), they were fine putting the messaging out there. Not so fine on actually doing anything that would affect them personally.

Next time, let the former pee-resident put his children at the front of the mob. Dear Ivanka, Jr., Eric, Bannon/Barron - get on out and protect the Leader. (Actually, he probably couldn't care.)

turbinetree

(27,464 posts)
17. They can explain all the way if they want .............they still have Blood On There Hands
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:07 PM
Feb 2021

Oath Keepers............sounds like some half wit right wing slogan, protecting the speakers at the insurrection gathering............ they are still fucking traitors.................

Lock "them" all up every last one of them and throw away the key, even that golf cart riding POS and has for the secret service detail...........

matt819

(10,749 posts)
18. Others have made these observations
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:11 PM
Feb 2021

And I think it’s an important one.

What did they think would happen?

What was the end game?

Ok. Let’s say they killed Pence and Pelosi. Then what? They go home? Would the entirety of the military and the secret service say, well, okay then, let’s call it a day?

Did they have assurances from anyone in the government that military support was forthcoming?

By the way, I think it’s useful to describe these people not as being in military uniform but in military costume.

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
39. Martial law, Trump inaugurated as President. Flynn had some military backing.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:40 PM
Feb 2021

Also I suspect some NG backing.
The insurrectionists are hailed as heroic patriots.

It was a big gamble but Trump almost won it.

Fiendish Thingy

(23,056 posts)
46. Martial law doesn't suspend the Constitution- Trump couldn't have been lawfully inaugurated. Nt
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:49 PM
Feb 2021

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
48. Yes of course, but Trump never ever lets the law stop him.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:56 PM
Feb 2021

He would have declared himself president and half the country would believe it.

Trump has always done what he wanted. The law matters not to him.

ewagner

(18,967 posts)
55. Don't get it....
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 03:16 PM
Feb 2021

What was the endgame?
This is confusing.
Trump would incite the crowd.
The crowd would storm the capitol building
They would capture/kill Pence and Pelosi and maybe others like AOC.

Then

Trump imposes the insurrection act/activates National Guard or other military

Then

National Guard/military PUT DOWN the insurrectionists that Trump activated; arrest, capture or kill the people who killed Pence, Pelosi and/or others

Trump turns on the MAGATS

Doesn’t. make. Sense.

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
41. More dots being connected. A lot more people involved than we knew.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:41 PM
Feb 2021

Trump almost pulled off all of this.

UpInArms

(54,894 posts)
51. Pic from the morning of January 6
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 03:01 PM
Feb 2021


A new video has surfaced showing former President Donald Trump's longtime adviser Roger Stone in Washington, D.C., on the morning of Jan. 6, flanked by members of the Oath Keepers militia group just hours before the deadly insurrection at the U.S. Capitol building.

In the video, which was obtained and reviewed by ABC News, Stone takes pictures and mingles with supporters outside a D.C. hotel as Oath Keepers hover around him, one wearing a baseball hat and military-style vest branded with the militia group's logo.

"So, hopefully we have this today, right?" one supporter asks Stone in the video, which was posted just after 10 a.m. on the morning of the rally. "We shall see," Stone replies.



https://abcnews.go.com/US/video-surfaces-showing-trump-ally-roger-stone-flanked/story?id=75706765

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
91. Roger Stone has a face badly in need of a fist. My gods look at his expression.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 05:52 PM
Feb 2021

Yeah, I know the German word, too. He is a vile, vile piece of work.

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
21. Trump incites an insurrection so he can declare marital law.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:16 PM
Feb 2021

There you have it.
And the Secret Service were involved.
Biden was said to want a new SS detail when he became president.
He didn't trust the Trump SS detail.

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
92. Following you thru this thread, I think we are on the same page...
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 05:59 PM
Feb 2021

Every agency needs going over with a fine tooth comb.

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
104. Yes we are facts pulling us in many directions.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:15 PM
Feb 2021

So far we have data that points us to these individual or groups:

The former President of the United States
Members of Congress
Capitol Police
DOD- civilian
Military (Flynn and his cohorts)

FBI--- it was common knowledge that Jan 6th was going to be an issue, where were the FBI reports?
Why no alert?

National Guard, were they on stand by to help Trump?

And all the militia groups who had been lead to believe they would be patriots for helping to kill Pence, block the EC vote and help Trump hang onto power.

paleotn

(22,155 posts)
34. Some of what's she's spouting might be true...
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:33 PM
Feb 2021

but I think she thinks far more of herself than she should. Nuts are like that sometimes.

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
52. Trump counted on them being full of themselves. He played into their delusions.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 03:05 PM
Feb 2021

Delusional enough to be his flying monkeys.
And he pushed home that they would be seen as heroes and loyal patriots.
They bought it hook, line and sinker.

And Trump almost pulled it off.

Progressive Jones

(6,011 posts)
44. I'd say it's time for some "advanced interrogation" of this individual, at an
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:44 PM
Feb 2021

undisclosed location.

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
50. She is afraid of prison time. I think she will talk. She also thinks she was doing the right thing.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:57 PM
Feb 2021

sobenji

(323 posts)
45. She's regurgitating Qanon bullshit
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 02:47 PM
Feb 2021

They all believed that and talked about it and planned for it.

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
53. KnR to read whole thing later. I hope the FBI "befriends" her and that she talks and talks and talks
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 03:11 PM
Feb 2021

Justice matters.

(9,741 posts)
61. Many MAGA Rats are actually talking...
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 03:47 PM
Feb 2021



Tweet by Glenn Kirshner:
If you’re charged by “information” (just a prosecutor signing the charging document) rather than by “indictment” (charge by the grand jury) it means the defendant likely is cooperating w/prosecutors. Also, the “sealed” cases are very likely cooperating as well


sop

(18,477 posts)
79. "Merrick Garland will tell senators on Monday that he will fight discrimination and domestic
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 04:32 PM
Feb 2021

extremism if confirmed as attorney general...'It is a fitting time to reaffirm that the role of the attorney general is to serve the Rule of Law and to ensure equal justice under the law,' Garland is expected to say at his confirmation hearing." - The Hill, 2/21/21

Garland will be their worst nightmare.

SunSeeker

(58,237 posts)
90. He should be. Manchin has not objected to him.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 05:41 PM
Feb 2021

And if the fucking Republicans filibuster him, we must end the anti-democratic filibuster rule right then and there. Then we must spend the next 4 years getting long delayed popular progessive legislation speedily through Congress. That is the only way we will keep the White House in 2024.

ancianita

(43,294 posts)
94. Good. I hadn't read anything but didn't want to be complacent.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:01 PM
Feb 2021

Last edited Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:44 PM - Edit history (1)

Everything you said, too, whether there's an attempted filibustering or not. Just nuke it, get on with the mountain of democracy saving and pandemic control that's ahead.

COL Mustard

(8,182 posts)
110. I Think If All Democrats Support Him, Yes
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:43 PM
Feb 2021

Maybe some Republicans too. He's not unreasonable.

ancianita

(43,294 posts)
111. Hope so.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:48 PM
Feb 2021

You could have fooled me on the "not unreasonable' point, because he's had a LOT of public pressure from back home on his minimum wage position.

Something about him is twisted when he won't vote with Democrats, yet won't represent his own state, either.

COL Mustard

(8,182 posts)
112. Sorry, I Was Referring To Garland, Not Manchin
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:51 PM
Feb 2021

Garland, from what I've read, is very much in the mainstream. Manchin is...pliable. I only hope Mitch doesn't convince him to change parties.

ancianita

(43,294 posts)
114. Okay.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 07:08 PM
Feb 2021

The "he" might be about Garland, but Repubs are likely being whipped to vote party line on him, and it won't be hard to get there because some of them stand to be investigated if he's confirmed, because he's the most experienced domestic terrorism jurist in the US, who will investigate their constitutional jeopardy over Jan 6 and before.
Trumpcult, being unreasonable, just don't care about Garland's reasonableness, love of law or honorability.

Unless Biden has had a sitdown with Manchin, I'm thinking he might pose the cheap pretext of "representing his constituents," and threaten Garland's confirmation.
Just the thought of it pisses me off.

COL Mustard

(8,182 posts)
122. Yup, I Agree With You
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 09:24 PM
Feb 2021

If he doesn't get confirmed this time, there is something rotten in the state of Denmark.

keithsw

(436 posts)
75. Along with several of you,
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 04:19 PM
Feb 2021

I said all along this was an inside job. And it will all come out. Capitol police were very much involved as well as several other entities. And this Jessica lady is a fucking lulu nut job

ancianita

(43,294 posts)
84. Yes.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 04:51 PM
Feb 2021

And so did I. Now it unfolds, with much more to be revealed after further court filings. Then there will be testimony under oath before the Pelosi Commission.

The 'aid and comfort' by elected officials makes 2022 look better now.

we can do it

(13,023 posts)
85. She is full of shit. Says she was forced to quit Army when they found out she was transgender.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 04:57 PM
Feb 2021

Somehow they didn’t notice during all those physical exams to begin with when you join.

louis-t

(24,607 posts)
86. Exaggerated self-importance, if you ask me.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 05:05 PM
Feb 2021

They all wanted to believe they were part of something that was bigger than them, important to the world, chosen by the 'chosen one' to help him lead. What a bunch of fucking losers.

Irish_Dem

(81,076 posts)
108. I believe Trump and his pals played into their delusional thinking.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:22 PM
Feb 2021

He made them useful to him.

stillcool

(34,407 posts)
99. Guess it sounds different coming from
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:06 PM
Feb 2021

a court filing. Or, maybe it's because it's the Oath Keepers, rather than the Proud Boys? Seems like the insurrection participants are talking, although probably not the elected officials this woman provided security for.

BigmanPigman

(55,083 posts)
119. Is this like Altamont when the Rolling Stones asked the Hells Angels
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 08:26 PM
Feb 2021

to provide security for the concert? It ended in disaster.

orangecrush

(30,128 posts)
123. The Secret Service called bullshit on her claims.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 10:01 PM
Feb 2021


The US Secret Service, in response to Watkins' claims in the Saturday filing, denied that private citizens were working with the Secret Service to provide security on January 6.

"To carry out its protective functions on January 6th, the U.S. Secret Service relied on the assistance of various government partners. Any assertion that the Secret Service employed private citizens to perform those functions is false," a US Secret Service spokesperson said in a statement to CNN on Sunday.



https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/21/politics/oath-keepers-vip-security-capitol-riot/index.html

keithbvadu2

(40,915 posts)
127. Let's see the VIP pass.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 10:51 PM
Feb 2021

Let's see the VIP pass.

That's not something that would be thrown away.

intheflow

(30,163 posts)
129. So her defense is that she believed the lies 45 fed her
Mon Feb 22, 2021, 11:52 AM
Feb 2021

and so she was acting patriotically and should not be released on bond? "I'm too stupid and gullible to understand the Constitution and the peaceful transfer of power. Please let me live on the outside!"

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Oath Keeper claims she wa...