Oath Keeper claims she was VIP security at Trump rally before riot and says she met with Secret Serv
Source: CNN
Oath Keeper claims she was VIP security at Trump rally before riot and says she met with Secret Service agents
A leader in an alleged Oath Keepers conspiracy in the US Capitol insurrection claims she was given a VIP pass to the pro-Trump rally on January 6, had met with Secret Service agents and was providing security for legislators and others, including in their march to the Capitol, according to a new court filing.
Attorneys for Ohio Oath Keeper Jessica Watkins detail how the efforts among paramilitants who are now accused of conspiracy on January 6 were closer to the apparatus around then-President Donald Trump and his rally than was previously known.
-snip-
"On January 5 and 6, Ms. Watkins was present not as an insurrectionist, but to provide security to the speakers at the rally, to provide escort for the legislators and others to march to the Capitol as directed by the then-President, and to safely escort protestors away from the Capitol to their vehicles and cars at the conclusion of the protest," the court filing said on Saturday. "She was given a VIP pass to the rally. She met with Secret Service agents. She was within 50 feet of the stage during the rally to provide security for the speakers. At the time the Capitol was breached, she was still at the sight of the initial rally where she had provided security."
-snip-
Watkins' defense attorney, Michelle Peterson, wrote on Saturday that her client and other supporters of Trump had believed the then-President would invoke the Insurrection Act to use the military to overturn what he falsely said was the fraudulent election of Joe Biden. And Watkins and others believed "they would have a role if this were to happen," the filing said.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/21/politics/oath-keepers-vip-security-capitol-riot/index.html
Much more at the link.
jpak
(41,780 posts)Yup
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)Which continue to give us a better picture of what happened.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)She could even believe it herself as delusional as she is.
H2O Man
(78,994 posts)highplainsdem
(61,845 posts)Botany
(77,210 posts)The permit for the rally was for ONLY the area by the White House where Trump had his rally.
It was limited to that area ONLY.
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)Botany
(77,210 posts)Time
Place
Date
along with paying for the rally (campaign funds) and decapitating the D.C. National Guard too.
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)Botany
(77,210 posts).... stay in power.
Trump Reportedly Bullied Pence: You Can Be a Patriot or a Pussy.
Trump was and is now scared about what would happen to him after he was no longer President. He knows that he
and his family have broken a shit ton of laws and needs protection.
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)He also enjoys death and violence.
blueinredohio
(6,797 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(18,051 posts)if he tried to use the Insurrection Act to get involved in the election process.
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)Goonch
(4,937 posts)
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)This is a costume, let's be clear. Ms. Watkins was not engaged in any military action that day. She was dressed up in a ridiculous costume, and mistook the costume world for reality. It's no different than somebody dressing up as a gorilla and actually believing themselves to be a gorilla. She needs mental health assistance.
diverdownjt
(737 posts)All hat no cattle says it all for me...it would be easier to show some cleavage w/o that metal plate in the way.
You know cosplay style...although do I really want to see that..........nope!
reACTIONary
(7,149 posts)... and served in Afghanistan as an Army Ranger. A bit more serious than cosplay.
moriah
(8,312 posts)I am all for these terrorists having attorneys, for them to have reasonable conditions in jail, etc. (And she needs a better attorney if they equate gender identity with sexual orientation as in the pleadings, though I have no idea what caused her separation from service).
I am not for saying that somehow because she is trans that this makes one iota of difference in her choosing to join a domestic terrorist organization and actively recruit "able bodied Patriots" to "fight, kill, and die" for Trump.
And ever since they stole the term "LARPing" to refer to real-world trolling instead of goth geeks occupying a mall or outdoor shopping center for an evening pretending to be vampires pretending to be people (yes those were my teen years), while I get that these are domestic terrorists and not SCA/Ren Faire people so calling it "cosplay" may seem to diminish the real threat, if their intent was not to "fight, kill, and die" they WOULD be ridiculous.
reACTIONary
(7,149 posts)The comment is addressed to the notion that this was cosplay and not serious. If she was male as an Army Ranger in Afghanistan, she may have seen combat. So she is not a naïve cosplay wanna be.
VA_Jill
(14,343 posts)Treason and insurrection are most emphatically NOT.
reACTIONary
(7,149 posts)... Cosplay and not serious. If she was male as an Army Ranger in Afghanistan, she may have seen combat. So she is not a naïve cosplay wanna be.
VA_Jill
(14,343 posts)what she was as an Army ranger (and incidentally, if she is trans now, she was pretty much always trans, she just wasn't acting on it, but I'm not getting into an argument with you here) is immaterial...she may or may not have been "out" trans then. What is material is the TREASON. Forget the rest of it.
reACTIONary
(7,149 posts)... "all hat and no cattle"? I think she knew what she was doing, knew how to do it, and was dangerous.
And treasonous.
Jilly_in_VA
(14,343 posts)I said what was important about her was the TREASON. And trans is immaterial. What about that do you not get? She is a TREASONOUS POS and should be treated as such.
reACTIONary
(7,149 posts).... "All hat no cattle" was from the post I was replying to originally. See https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142699941#post25
I was disagreeing with that assessment. I don't think she is all hat and no cattle. The reason that I mentioned that she is trans is that it opens the possibility that she was engaged in actual combat in Afghanistan. That is relevant to whether or not she is or isn't all hat and no cattle.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)There was not a military action going on on January 6. She was in costume like a clown.
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)she needs to be committed to a mental institution...
stopdiggin
(15,381 posts)unfortunately -- with the prevalence of alternative facts, and alternate realities -- I'm not sure if the "illness" label still works. But this is 'dress up' -- and fantasy -- and as we have come to find out, 'delusion.'
BobTheSubgenius
(12,211 posts)You have an awesome life when you can live your cosplay 24/7/365.
reACTIONary
(7,149 posts)... Army Ranger, served in Afghanistan, and is transgender.
She might have more going for her than just cosplay.
Pepsidog
(6,362 posts)Last edited Sun Feb 21, 2021, 05:48 PM - Edit history (1)
makes you Ranger ready, not a part of the active regiment of fighting Rangers.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/tom-cotton-army-ranger-school-1118418/
Yeehah
(6,422 posts)That statement is laughably untrue.
Ms. Watkins did not complete Ranger School, but reportedly did complete the much easier Airborne School. In which case, she was likely an enlisted member (as a male) of a Ranger battalion, who had not completed Ranger School. She served about three months overseas, from what I've read. All soldiers assigned to a Ranger battalion must graduate Ranger School or they will be assigned elsewhere.
Pepsidog
(6,362 posts)]https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/tom-cotton-army-ranger-school-1118418/
Yeehah
(6,422 posts)RASP is a short course for soldiers who are assigned to the Ranger Regiment who have not completed Ranger School. Anyone who wants to remain in the Ranger Regiment must complete Ranger School or they will be assigned elsewhere. RASP is not easy but Ranger School is more difficult, and many soldiers who complete RASP do not graduate Ranger School.
Soldiers must be selected to attend Ranger School. You will not be selected unless you are in a specialty that requires small unit tactics (generally infantry and special forces) and you are in top physical condition, and you are recommended by your commander. This is a very small fraction of the military. Ranger School is open to all members of the military, as the public affairs person stated, but so is the Ranger Regiment. Anyone can ask for either one. But only a few actually get to go.
It is misleading for a soldier to refer to themself an "Army Ranger" if they did not serve in the Ranger Regiment, but is technically not a lie. Cotton is guilty of aggradizement but not a mistruth.
I hate Cotton and want to see him go down in flames, but this uninformed article is just as misleading as Cotton's claim to "service as an Army Ranger."
Pepsidog
(6,362 posts)reACTIONary
(7,149 posts).... I was quoting the article; I have no other knowledge of military affairs.
sarge43
(29,173 posts)civilian newspaper articles concerning anything martial.
Almost guaranteed at least one faux pas. Confusing rank vs duty title, type of discharge: An Other Than Honorable is not the same as a Dishonorable, because two individual's rank is called the same, both have the same pay grade: There are nine enlisted pay grades in the US service and it's the pay grade that determines your place in the pecking order, not the name. The Army, Marine Corps and Air Force have the rank master sergeant. Army and Marines MSG have the pay grade of E-8, Air Force E-7. Guess who pecks whom. An Army captain (O-3) does not exist in the same universe as a Navy captain (O-6).
reACTIONary
(7,149 posts)... even with reporters who specialize in those topics.
sarge43
(29,173 posts)Its 'science' editor in an article about Goddard's rocket tests stated that rockets would never work in outer space because the propellant would have nothing to push against.
Following Apollo 11's success the Times did allow that the then science editor was probably wrong.
reACTIONary
(7,149 posts)reACTIONary
(7,149 posts)stopdiggin
(15,381 posts)And ..... Mike Flynn is a whack job too. Wearing a uniforrn does not inoculate people from bizarro, and the ridiculous.
I'll stick with cosplay here -- and be willing to bet that a lot of service people (current and former) would back me up.
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)Gen Michael Flynn and Gen Benedict Arnold both started out as patriots who served their country well.
Arnold died a traitor in England.
He was not lucky enough to have a Donald Trump on his side.

Hekate
(100,133 posts)...at our national Capitol, and dozens of cops were maimed, including one who had his eyes gouged out. Participants brought various flags attached to heavy rods and spears so they were ready made weapons.
There were no doubt some floating in la-la land, like the shaman, but hundreds came in various uniforms to make them identifiable to their friends, worked in unison, and in all ways behaved like an army. Some of the uniforms were Proud Boys jackets, and some were US military surplus down to the helmets and protective eyewear.
They came seeking violence. They came bringing violence. Many were trained by the US military and American police departments. How far does this go?
Yet for whatever reason that I cannot fathom, participant Jessica Watkins with her military training and military gear is dismissed, up to and including the comment that her uniform doesnt show her cleavage. What the everloving fck is that about?
sop
(18,477 posts)I hope they follow the money trail, and the DOJ prosecutes those responsible.
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)And it is not a pretty picture.
Mike 03
(18,690 posts)were expressing rage on Parler at Trump because they were anticipating specific instructions/orders that never arrived. The upset Parler users were saying: They'd been told something would happen that day once they arrived at the Capitol, but it didn't happen. Some also expressed that they believed Trump actually was walking with them to the Capitol.
That was reported on CNN (broadcast, a verbal report) in the first day or two after the insurrection. Then I never heard any more about it. At the time, it sounded like evidence of conspiracy, or a rumor that got out of control.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)The US government doesn't randomly and without explicit contract enlist dipshits from Ohio to provide security for anything.
It's so exhausting having to deal with this adolescent nonsense from grown people constantly.
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)group. To form an insurrection mob.
stopdiggin
(15,381 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)stopdiggin
(15,381 posts)with Jessica Watkins (or her Ohio militia group) to provide 'security' -- at either the Mall, or the Capital. I'd be interesting to see a copy of that ... Or indeed any type of official 'coordination' between legitimate security and military (SS, NG, Capital police, etc.) with these outside wanna-be pretenders.
But I don't think it happened.
Watkins story, for Jan 6 and running up to it, is mostly a delusional flight of fancy.
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)Too many other pieces of the puzzle supporting her account.
I am trained as a scientist, and I follow the data.
The data is adding up to something very sinister.
stopdiggin
(15,381 posts)zeroing in on the scent. (and countering -- an awful lot of the "conspirators" that are obviously not the sharpest knives ... attempting to bury communications and such.) Our national security guys are pretty good at this stuff. So -- I'd say there's a pretty good chance that we will find out.
Your idea that something sinister took place is not that far fetched. I'm just contending that JWatkins (and her little band of merry thieves) had little to do with it. NOT the people I'd be counting on to plan my insurrection ....
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)Yes if we can start putting dots together, certainly so can the CIA and FBI.
bottomofthehill
(9,381 posts)There needed to be insurrection, that she would be a part of, in order for the insurrection act to be invoked. Therefore she is admitting to insurrection. She was a willing pawn, and one that took part in an armed insurrection. Fuck her, try her, convict Lt her and incarcerate this little toy soldier for a long time. She is a dangerous psycho
AnotherMother4Peace
(5,110 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)He would dump them in a heartbeat.
Justice matters.
(9,741 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)The rest of us are all losers.
ashredux
(2,926 posts)greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)She was crazy enough to become a flying monkey for Trump.
But sane enough to tell us the truth about what happened.
Grasswire2
(13,849 posts)Because if not, how in hell was she going to provide the security she says was her responsibility?
If she wasn't armed, she's lying.
If she was the only one, pffffffffffffft.
UpInArms
(54,894 posts)Have to call BS on this part:
Watkins' defense attorney, Michelle Peterson, wrote on Saturday that her client and other supporters of Trump had believed the then-President would invoke the Insurrection Act to use the military to overturn what he falsely said was the fraudulent election of Joe Biden. And Watkins and others believed "they would have a role if this were to happen," the filing said.
"However misguided, her intentions were not in any way related to an intention to overthrow the government, but to support what she believed to be the lawful government. She took an oath to support the Constitution and had no intention of violating that oath or of committing any violent acts."
Watkins' attorney argued in the filing her client had worn tactical gear potentially to defend herself, and walked up the Capitol steps with other Oath Keepers in a "stack" formation because the group may have wanted to stay together in the crowd.
Eta picturs:


Docreed2003
(18,714 posts)Her lawyer is arguing that she "took an Oath to protect the Constitution" and, in her mind, beecause she was doing that she's simply "misguided" and she was upholding her view of "lawful government".
What a crock of crap!!
UpInArms
(54,894 posts)mezame
(295 posts)Which ones?
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)stopdiggin
(15,381 posts)"Sure, thanks .."
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)In her fever dream.
bucolic_frolic
(54,972 posts)Invoking the Insurrection Act, used to deploy US military and National Guard troop to suppress rebellion, unrest, or insurrection, to instead suppress the actions of Congress and support his self-induced insurrection!
It is such a good thing progressives stayed home and didn't give him a chance to test fly that rocket.
I am quite surprised Trump didn't supply his own Antifa to complete the circuit.
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)He could declare martial law then.
bucolic_frolic
(54,972 posts)The unrest and rebellion is already underway.
And we are only saved because his agents failed. He wasn't even any good at insurrection!
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)By minutes. It was a miracle he did not win.
erronis
(23,722 posts)But just like all the chicken-hawks of W's regime (Cheney, Rumsfeld, Woo, Ashcroft, etc.), they were fine putting the messaging out there. Not so fine on actually doing anything that would affect them personally.
Next time, let the former pee-resident put his children at the front of the mob. Dear Ivanka, Jr., Eric, Bannon/Barron - get on out and protect the Leader. (Actually, he probably couldn't care.)
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)turbinetree
(27,464 posts)Oath Keepers............sounds like some half wit right wing slogan, protecting the speakers at the insurrection gathering............
they are still fucking traitors.................
Lock "them" all up every last one of them and throw away the key, even that golf cart riding POS and has for the secret service detail...........
matt819
(10,749 posts)And I think its an important one.
What did they think would happen?
What was the end game?
Ok. Lets say they killed Pence and Pelosi. Then what? They go home? Would the entirety of the military and the secret service say, well, okay then, lets call it a day?
Did they have assurances from anyone in the government that military support was forthcoming?
By the way, I think its useful to describe these people not as being in military uniform but in military costume.
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)Also I suspect some NG backing.
The insurrectionists are hailed as heroic patriots.
It was a big gamble but Trump almost won it.
Fiendish Thingy
(23,056 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)He would have declared himself president and half the country would believe it.
Trump has always done what he wanted. The law matters not to him.
ewagner
(18,967 posts)What was the endgame?
This is confusing.
Trump would incite the crowd.
The crowd would storm the capitol building
They would capture/kill Pence and Pelosi and maybe others like AOC.
Then
Trump imposes the insurrection act/activates National Guard or other military
Then
National Guard/military PUT DOWN the insurrectionists that Trump activated; arrest, capture or kill the people who killed Pence, Pelosi and/or others
Trump turns on the MAGATS
Doesnt. make. Sense.
highplainsdem
(61,845 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)Trump almost pulled off all of this.
UpInArms
(54,894 posts)
In the video, which was obtained and reviewed by ABC News, Stone takes pictures and mingles with supporters outside a D.C. hotel as Oath Keepers hover around him, one wearing a baseball hat and military-style vest branded with the militia group's logo.
"So, hopefully we have this today, right?" one supporter asks Stone in the video, which was posted just after 10 a.m. on the morning of the rally. "We shall see," Stone replies.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/video-surfaces-showing-trump-ally-roger-stone-flanked/story?id=75706765
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Yeah, I know the German word, too. He is a vile, vile piece of work.

UpInArms
(54,894 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)There you have it.
And the Secret Service were involved.
Biden was said to want a new SS detail when he became president.
He didn't trust the Trump SS detail.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Every agency needs going over with a fine tooth comb.
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)So far we have data that points us to these individual or groups:
The former President of the United States
Members of Congress
Capitol Police
DOD- civilian
Military (Flynn and his cohorts)
FBI--- it was common knowledge that Jan 6th was going to be an issue, where were the FBI reports?
Why no alert?
National Guard, were they on stand by to help Trump?
And all the militia groups who had been lead to believe they would be patriots for helping to kill Pence, block the EC vote and help Trump hang onto power.
Initech
(108,620 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)IronLionZion
(51,174 posts)paleotn
(22,155 posts)but I think she thinks far more of herself than she should. Nuts are like that sometimes.
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)Delusional enough to be his flying monkeys.
And he pushed home that they would be seen as heroes and loyal patriots.
They bought it hook, line and sinker.
And Trump almost pulled it off.
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)undisclosed location.
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)sobenji
(323 posts)They all believed that and talked about it and planned for it.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Justice matters.
(9,741 posts)Link to tweet
Tweet by Glenn Kirshner:
If youre charged by information (just a prosecutor signing the charging document) rather than by indictment (charge by the grand jury) it means the defendant likely is cooperating w/prosecutors. Also, the sealed cases are very likely cooperating as well
Evolve Dammit
(21,749 posts)Blue Owl
(58,972 posts)SunSeeker
(58,237 posts)sop
(18,477 posts)extremism if confirmed as attorney general...'It is a fitting time to reaffirm that the role of the attorney general is to serve the Rule of Law and to ensure equal justice under the law,' Garland is expected to say at his confirmation hearing." - The Hill, 2/21/21
Garland will be their worst nightmare.
ancianita
(43,294 posts)SunSeeker
(58,237 posts)And if the fucking Republicans filibuster him, we must end the anti-democratic filibuster rule right then and there. Then we must spend the next 4 years getting long delayed popular progessive legislation speedily through Congress. That is the only way we will keep the White House in 2024.
ancianita
(43,294 posts)Last edited Sun Feb 21, 2021, 06:44 PM - Edit history (1)
Everything you said, too, whether there's an attempted filibustering or not. Just nuke it, get on with the mountain of democracy saving and pandemic control that's ahead.
COL Mustard
(8,182 posts)Maybe some Republicans too. He's not unreasonable.
ancianita
(43,294 posts)You could have fooled me on the "not unreasonable' point, because he's had a LOT of public pressure from back home on his minimum wage position.
Something about him is twisted when he won't vote with Democrats, yet won't represent his own state, either.
COL Mustard
(8,182 posts)Garland, from what I've read, is very much in the mainstream. Manchin is...pliable. I only hope Mitch doesn't convince him to change parties.
ancianita
(43,294 posts)The "he" might be about Garland, but Repubs are likely being whipped to vote party line on him, and it won't be hard to get there because some of them stand to be investigated if he's confirmed, because he's the most experienced domestic terrorism jurist in the US, who will investigate their constitutional jeopardy over Jan 6 and before.
Trumpcult, being unreasonable, just don't care about Garland's reasonableness, love of law or honorability.
Unless Biden has had a sitdown with Manchin, I'm thinking he might pose the cheap pretext of "representing his constituents," and threaten Garland's confirmation.
Just the thought of it pisses me off.
COL Mustard
(8,182 posts)If he doesn't get confirmed this time, there is something rotten in the state of Denmark.
keithsw
(436 posts)I said all along this was an inside job. And it will all come out. Capitol police were very much involved as well as several other entities. And this Jessica lady is a fucking lulu nut job
And so did I. Now it unfolds, with much more to be revealed after further court filings. Then there will be testimony under oath before the Pelosi Commission.
The 'aid and comfort' by elected officials makes 2022 look better now.
we can do it
(13,023 posts)Somehow they didnt notice during all those physical exams to begin with when you join.
louis-t
(24,607 posts)They all wanted to believe they were part of something that was bigger than them, important to the world, chosen by the 'chosen one' to help him lead. What a bunch of fucking losers.
Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)He made them useful to him.
apnu
(8,790 posts)orangecrush
(30,128 posts)stillcool
(34,407 posts)a court filing. Or, maybe it's because it's the Oath Keepers, rather than the Proud Boys? Seems like the insurrection participants are talking, although probably not the elected officials this woman provided security for.
dawn5651
(758 posts)Irish_Dem
(81,076 posts)LongtimeAZDem
(4,516 posts)BigmanPigman
(55,083 posts)to provide security for the concert? It ended in disaster.
orangecrush
(30,128 posts)The US Secret Service, in response to Watkins' claims in the Saturday filing, denied that private citizens were working with the Secret Service to provide security on January 6.
"To carry out its protective functions on January 6th, the U.S. Secret Service relied on the assistance of various government partners. Any assertion that the Secret Service employed private citizens to perform those functions is false," a US Secret Service spokesperson said in a statement to CNN on Sunday.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/21/politics/oath-keepers-vip-security-capitol-riot/index.html
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)Let's see the VIP pass.
That's not something that would be thrown away.
intheflow
(30,163 posts)and so she was acting patriotically and should not be released on bond? "I'm too stupid and gullible to understand the Constitution and the peaceful transfer of power. Please let me live on the outside!"
