Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 09:42 AM Mar 2021

French nuclear tests infected 'almost entire Polynesian population': report

Source: Agence France-Presse/MSN


AFP 50 mins ago

France concealed the levels of radioactivity that French Polynesia was exposed to during French nuclear tests in the Pacific from 1966-1996, with almost the "entire population" of the overseas territory infected, a report said on Tuesday.

Online investigation site Disclose said it had over two years analysed some 2,000 pages of French military documents declassified in 2013 by the defence ministry concerning nuclear tests on the archipelago.

It worked alongside the British modelling and documentation firm Interprt as well as the Science and global security programme of the University of Princeton in the United States, it said.

For the Centaur test carried out in July 1974, "according to our calculations, based on a scientific reassessment of the doses received, approximately 110,000 people were infected, almost the entire Polynesian population at the time," it said.

Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/french-nuclear-tests-infected-almost-entire-polynesian-population-report/ar-BB1ep2cF?%253Bocid=u146dhp

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
French nuclear tests infected 'almost entire Polynesian population': report (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2021 OP
Yeah, and the ones they didn't infect, we did. n/t malthaussen Mar 2021 #1
When did we start using the work "infect" for radiation contamination? Miguelito Loveless Mar 2021 #2
THANK YOU! Kali Mar 2021 #3
Infection implies something that can be treated, posssibly cured, Miguelito Loveless Mar 2021 #4
infection is caused by pathogens - Kali Mar 2021 #5
Agreed... Miguelito Loveless Mar 2021 #16
Good question - did we start with just this one report? caraher Mar 2021 #6
This is the first time I have seen the word used in this context Miguelito Loveless Mar 2021 #15
well llashram Mar 2021 #9
I was thinking the same thing. nt oldsoftie Mar 2021 #14
Yes, I can only assume it was a bad translation from the French original relayerbob Mar 2021 #17
Hmmm... Miguelito Loveless Mar 2021 #18
"Infected?" That's the wrong word. hunter Mar 2021 #7
My father was in White Sands James48 Mar 2021 #13
Pfft. we were contaminating people and destroying islands way before the French. Javaman Mar 2021 #8
Better versions of the story Nasruddin Mar 2021 #10
mistranslation Nasruddin Mar 2021 #11
Your side note is so true Steelrolled Mar 2021 #12
"If you know anything about the topic" CloudWatcher Mar 2021 #19
"Affected," not "infected." Sheesh, most ESL people do better than that. Warpy Mar 2021 #20
"Infect" is the wrong word. MineralMan Mar 2021 #21

Miguelito Loveless

(4,477 posts)
2. When did we start using the work "infect" for radiation contamination?
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 10:28 AM
Mar 2021

"Infect" in a medical context has a pretty specific meaning, radiation is not a pathogen.

Miguelito Loveless

(4,477 posts)
4. Infection implies something that can be treated, posssibly cured,
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 10:59 AM
Mar 2021

Radiation treatment depends on exposure level and duration, and is problematic.

Kali

(55,031 posts)
5. infection is caused by pathogens -
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 11:16 AM
Mar 2021

viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and worms.

radiation is energy and can cause illness, but it isn't a pathogen that causes infection. (in fact it can be used to kill pathogens)

caraher

(6,279 posts)
6. Good question - did we start with just this one report?
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 11:18 AM
Mar 2021

Clearly at odds with the dictionary definition of infection. The first dictionary I checked says to infect is to

"affect (a person, organism, cell, etc.) with a disease-causing organism."

This is an actively misleading usage, as "infection" carries a lot of implications that are simply false (e.g. that it might be possible to "infect" other people if you are a victim).

Miguelito Loveless

(4,477 posts)
15. This is the first time I have seen the word used in this context
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 02:15 PM
Mar 2021

As to infecting other people, it is possible to contaminate other people, especially if a victim comes into contact with others who are unprotected, and the victims has radioactive debris (like fallout) that has not been washed off.

llashram

(6,265 posts)
9. well
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 01:27 PM
Mar 2021

exposed, poisoned might be better words, yet I can understand the point being expressed in the poisoning of these POC by...and America did the same type of "infecting".

hunter

(38,349 posts)
7. "Infected?" That's the wrong word.
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 11:39 AM
Mar 2021

Nuclear weapons testing polluted the environment with toxic materials, many of these radioactive.

The word "infected" is used for fungi, bacteria, viruses, etc., that multiply within the organism they infect.

One doesn't, for example, get "infected" by air or water pollution, although both can be deadly, and both might contain pathogens.

Maybe this is a bad translation of the original French.

Nuclear weapons testing was a horrible thing. My wife's father witnessed an atomic bomb test up close. He was one of the human guinea pigs used in U.S.weapons testing. The military wanted to see how soldiers and sailors would fare in an actual nuclear battle. He didn't tell anyone, not even my mother-in-law, until a few years after Congress rescinded the Atomic Veteran “oath-of-secrecy” in 1996.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_veteran



Civilian "downwinders" were similarly exposed to toxic materials from nuclear weapons manufacture and testing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downwinders

James48

(4,444 posts)
13. My father was in White Sands
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 01:46 PM
Mar 2021

In 1953-54, and participated in multiple Nevada test explosions. He died of a heart attack in 1973, at the age of 39.

Javaman

(62,534 posts)
8. Pfft. we were contaminating people and destroying islands way before the French.
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 12:21 PM
Mar 2021

(if anything the French took lessons from us)

How the U.S. betrayed the Marshall Islands, kindling the next nuclear disaster

https://www.latimes.com/projects/marshall-islands-nuclear-testing-sea-level-rise/



&ab_channel=PeriscopeFilm

&ab_channel=BritishPath%C3%A9

Operation Crossroads
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Crossroads


Operation Crossroads was a pair of nuclear weapon tests conducted by the United States at Bikini Atoll in mid-1946. They were the first nuclear weapon tests since Trinity in July 1945, and the first detonations of nuclear devices since the atomic bombing of Nagasaki on August 9, 1945. The purpose of the tests was to investigate the effect of nuclear weapons on warships.

The Crossroads tests were the first of many nuclear tests held in the Marshall Islands, and the first to be publicly announced beforehand and observed by an invited audience, including a large press corps. They were conducted by Joint Army/Navy Task Force One, headed by Vice Admiral William H. P. Blandy rather than by the Manhattan Project, which had developed nuclear weapons during World War II. A fleet of 95 target ships was assembled in Bikini Lagoon and hit with two detonations of Fat Man plutonium implosion-type nuclear weapons of the kind dropped on Nagasaki, each with a yield of 23 kilotons of TNT (96 TJ).

The first test was Able. The bomb was named Gilda after Rita Hayworth's character in the 1946 film Gilda, and was dropped from the B-29 Superfortress Dave's Dream of the 509th Bombardment Group on July 1, 1946. It detonated 520 feet (158 m) above the target fleet and caused less than the expected amount of ship damage because it missed its aim point by 2,130 feet (649 m).

The second test was Baker. The bomb was known as Helen of Bikini and was detonated 90 feet (27 m) underwater on July 25, 1946. Radioactive sea spray caused extensive contamination. A third deep-water test named Charlie was planned for 1947 but was canceled primarily because of the United States Navy's inability to decontaminate the target ships after the Baker test. Ultimately, only nine target ships were able to be scrapped rather than scuttled. Charlie was rescheduled as Operation Wigwam, a deep-water shot conducted in 1955 off the coast of Mexico (Baja California).

Bikini's native residents agreed to evacuate the island, and were evacuated on board the LST-861, with most moving to the Rongerik Atoll. In the 1950s, a series of large thermonuclear tests rendered Bikini unfit for subsistence farming and fishing because of radioactive contamination. Bikini remains uninhabited as of 2017, though it is occasionally visited by sport divers. Planners attempted to protect participants in the Operation Crossroads tests against radiation sickness, but one study showed that the life expectancy of participants was reduced by an average of three months. The Baker test's radioactive contamination of all the target ships was the first case of immediate, concentrated radioactive fallout from a nuclear explosion. Chemist Glenn T. Seaborg, the longest-serving chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, called Baker "the world's first nuclear disaster."[1]

Nasruddin

(756 posts)
10. Better versions of the story
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 01:34 PM
Mar 2021

The Guardian has a better written version here:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/09/france-has-underestimated-impact-of-nuclear-tests-in-french-polynesia-research-finds
(Quelle surprise)

I was able to find the original of the story thru them. There's an English version but the links appear damaged or incomplete so I'll just leave you with the French version.
https://disclose.ngo/fr/investigations/toxique
Lire l'enquete has more background info if you need it -
It goes here
https://moruroa-files.org/
& there's a choice of (working) English or French versions.

Side note:
The utter, incredible ignorance of many journalists & their editors when covering science topics is a real danger to us all. Be very, very skeptical of anything in the press written about a science topic, at least in American press or by American "journalists". If you know anything about the topic you will usually be astounded by how wrong they are, & if you don't but do your own background work (like here) you will wind up shaking your head.

Among other things it's no wonder there's so much accusation of fake news - a lot of it is fake!


Nasruddin

(756 posts)
11. mistranslation
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 01:41 PM
Mar 2021

Incidentally, the mistranslation seems to go back to the original.
Here's the English version from the morurua files:

According to our calculations, based on a scientific reassessment of the doses received, approximately 110,000 people were infected,

D’après nos calculs, environ 110 000 personnes ont été dangereusement exposées à la radioactivité,

As you can see someone at disclose mistranslated it & also "improved" the quality of the estimate with a notion not in the French version. I'm assuming the French version is the original, as the issue and the disclose company are French.

Should be wary of the original work with this kind of distortion in play!

 

Steelrolled

(2,022 posts)
12. Your side note is so true
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 01:46 PM
Mar 2021

I first encountered this 30 or so years ago. I was astonished. But I've become used to it, and just accept it now.

To be fair, doing good, accurate, reporting is difficult. But time is of the essence, and it shows. Sometimes I think inaccurate reporting is willful, but usually not. And bias is frequent even in "unbiased" sources.

CloudWatcher

(1,851 posts)
19. "If you know anything about the topic"
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 02:27 PM
Mar 2021

Sadly this is true of almost all MSM, it's not limited to science topics. There are exceptions (Maddow), but it's really sad what passes as journalism.

Warpy

(111,437 posts)
20. "Affected," not "infected." Sheesh, most ESL people do better than that.
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 03:46 PM
Mar 2021

/pedantry

However, the sky high rates of thyroid problems and other radiation based illness in French Polynesia have been known for a long time, this is just France finally owning up to the damage 50 years late.

It's one of those things people knew but the government managed to sweep under the rug.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»French nuclear tests infe...