Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 01:31 PM Mar 2021

Millions more smokers and ex-smokers should receive free annual screenings for lung cancer...

Source: Washington Post


Millions more smokers and ex-smokers should receive free annual screenings for lung cancer, a federally appointed task force says

The recommendation would double the number of people eligible for the tests, but some experts worry about possible false positives and follow-up tests.

By Laurie McGinley
March 9, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EST

A federally appointed task force recommended a major increase in the number of Americans eligible for free screening for lung cancer, saying expanded testing will save lives and especially benefit Black people and women.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, an independent group of 16 physicians and scientists who evaluate preventive tests and medications, said people with a long history of smoking should begin receiving annual low-dose CT scans at age 50, five years earlier than the group recommended in 2013. The group also broadened the definition of people it considers at high risk for the disease.

The changes mean that 15 million people, nearly twice the current number, will be eligible for thescans to detect the No. 1 cancer killer in the United States. Under the Affordable Care Act, private insurers must cover services, without patient cost-sharing, that receive “A” or “B” recommendations from the task force. The lung cancer screening recommendation received a “B” rating. Medicare also generally follows the group’s guidance.

The recommendation was welcomed by many lung-cancer specialists but drew a more cautious reaction from some physicians who noted that the test can produce false positives — flagging a spot or growth that is benign — and lead to potentially costly and invasive follow-up tests such as biopsies.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/03/09/lung-cancer-screening/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Millions more smokers and ex-smokers should receive free annual screenings for lung cancer... (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2021 OP
I was flag and told .03% chance of cancer follow up with another the following year. LizBeth Mar 2021 #1
But Rush Limbaugh said smoking doesn't cause cancer. liberalmuse Mar 2021 #2

LizBeth

(9,952 posts)
1. I was flag and told .03% chance of cancer follow up with another the following year.
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 01:41 PM
Mar 2021

I did it and went to .08% chance cancer and another year. Did a third time and said, nope not cancer.

Costly because two extra test at $800? No. But, I was assured and glad they handled it as such. I think it is a good idea. I will get another 2 or 3 yrs down the road even if I have to pay, just for assurance.

liberalmuse

(18,672 posts)
2. But Rush Limbaugh said smoking doesn't cause cancer.
Tue Mar 9, 2021, 01:42 PM
Mar 2021

Oh wait...

I'm in a particularly ugly mood this morning.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Millions more smokers and...