Angus King signals he would nix filibuster for voting rights
Source: The Hill
Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) signaled on Wednesday that he would support changing the Senate's rules if Republicans block voting rights legislation.
King, who has long been viewed as wary of changing the filibuster, laid out his thinking in a Washington Post op-ed, saying he viewed voting rights as a "special case."
"All-out opposition to reasonable voting rights protections cannot be enabled by the filibuster; if forced to choose between a Senate rule and democracy itself, I know where I will come down," King wrote.
Opponents the filibuster have long viewed voting rights and sweeping democracy and election reforms as fertile ground for swaying Democratic senators wary of changing the rules.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/544683-angus-king-signals-he-would-nix-filibuster-for-voting-rights
dalton99a
(81,486 posts)Lonestarblue
(9,988 posts)Both are smart enough to realize that the Republican bills in several states are intended only to prevent fair elections and to stack the deck for Republicans.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Does that bother him any?
nevergiveup
(4,760 posts)I would consider him a pragmatic progressive and there is nothing wrong with that.
Martin68
(22,801 posts)How's it feel to be caught in a vise as it slowly but inexorably tightens?
BumRushDaShow
(128,979 posts)they WILL block it. It is the only way they can stay in power.
The things they had in there were crazy. They had things, levels of voting that if youd ever agreed to it, youd never have a Republican elected in this country again, - Trump
"As people do better, they start voting like Republicans - unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing." - Karl Rove
Johnny2X2X
(19,066 posts)They can change it in a way that still symbolically keeps it, but makes it back to what it was intended to be, a way to be heard, not a way to derail altogether.
King is a key cog, it's all about Sinema and Manchin, I think there's a path forward still, especially on voting rights.
nuxvomica
(12,424 posts)Or whatever the Senate does that is just as significant.