White House says Biden is prepared to issue executive orders on guns
Source: Yahoo News
In the wake of two mass shootings in the U.S. in a single week, the White House said Friday that President Biden is prepared to issue executive orders to enact gun reform, circumventing the need for a divided Congress to pass legislation.
White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters at a briefing that she couldnt offer an exact time frame on when those orders would move off Bidens desk, but said they were one of the levers that we can use ... to help address the prevalence of gun violence and address community safety around the country.
Biden, however, made clear during his Thursday afternoon press conference that infrastructure rather than gun reform would be his next legislative priority, which led to complaints from gun control activists and progressive Democrats.
Psaki said Biden understands their frustration and suggested that their ire be directed toward those members of Congress who are voting to block gun control legislation.
Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/white-house-says-biden-is-prepared-to-issue-executive-orders-on-guns-180754699.html
ripcord
(5,553 posts)Does the President have the authority to use executive action to limit constitutional rights.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Executive Action seemed to work for trump, why not Biden.
Agree, it will be interesting.
FBaggins
(26,783 posts)Taking on 2A with the current makeup of the court is very likely a waste of political capital.
yaesu
(8,020 posts)Biden outdoes tRump on EO's
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)The average American will take more notice if an issue is pushed to top priority.
If people see action being taken, they'll let their voices be heard.
We know that the majority in this nation want common sense reforms.
Make it happen. Screw the GOP.
Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)Executive actions are increasing taking the place of legislations, but it seems constitutionality is still more-or-less needed.
hack89
(39,171 posts)He will nibble around the issue to placate people like you. My guns will be fine.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)I think it is a really safe assumption.
elleng
(131,290 posts)especially not knowing what the executive action(s) will include?
melm00se
(4,997 posts)Imagine it being upheld.
Then a president gets in and uses executive action to outlaw anything in the Bill of Rights.
The song would change in a heartbeat.
You either defend all rights or you defend none.
Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)but the executive ignores the ruling. If it is an issue with sufficient partisan support, I think the President could do it.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,759 posts)James48
(4,444 posts)With an Executive Order. He can only ask Congress to move something, and he can propose lots of things, but there is little within his authority in an Executive Order.
keithbvadu2
(37,004 posts)Declare a national emergency.
Trump showed that republicans like them.
ancianita
(36,201 posts)I don't know, but if it was, this could be connected to that.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)elleng
(131,290 posts)to Capitol Hill. He said earlier this week that he believes his administration can guide a narrow Democratic majority in the Senate to pass two gun reform bills kicked over from the House of Representatives, despite multiple failed attempts of previous administrations to get comprehensive laws on the books.
The bills passed by Democrats in the House would require background checks to be performed for all gun purchases and transfers and would close the so-called Charleston loophole, which in some instances allows gun sales without a completed background check.'
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)He could limit imports of "assault weapons". He could direct the ATF to consider 80% receivers to be actual fireams (this would certainly be challenged in court). He could also direct that local law enforcement authorities be notified if someone fails an FBI background check to buy a gun from a registered dealer.
He cannot mandate universal background checks, or ban the sale of "assault weapons" and "high" capacity magazines. Those actions would require legislation.
elleng
(131,290 posts)who are voting to block gun control legislation.'
Blues Heron
(5,948 posts)what other hobby comes with such a death toll?
twodogsbarking
(9,885 posts)Opiods?
Blues Heron
(5,948 posts)Naked mountaineering?
Cage surfing at the Zoo?
twodogsbarking
(9,885 posts)Mt. Everest?
twodogsbarking
(9,885 posts)Jen Psaki? She is becoming my dream girl.
Blues Heron
(5,948 posts)threadlet winner!
twodogsbarking
(9,885 posts)I want a t-shirt with Jen's pic. Available, where else, Amazon.
twodogsbarking
(9,885 posts)Riding shotgun with Tiger Woods.
True Blue American
(17,995 posts)Say that we need to get guns out of criminal hands.
Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)Bayard
(22,199 posts)Its the people with no record that seem to do the most damage.
Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)in environments of extreme partisanship.
Skirting the constitution becomes acceptable as long as it supports our side.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Martin68
(22,945 posts)Politicub
(12,165 posts)At his press conference, he said he intends to run again in 2024.
Martin68
(22,945 posts)madville
(7,413 posts)Executive Orders have a limited scope in this arena.
MichMan
(12,001 posts)The issuer gets credit for trying and entities like the NRA, Gun lobby, Republicans, and the RW courts get the blame when they are overturned
Karma13612
(4,555 posts)Demand universal background checks?
Based on logic and previous comments, its doubtful he can issue an EO to ban assault weapons, but if we can get universal background checks, that could help.
hack89
(39,171 posts)For one thing, without legislation there is no way to pay for it. National UBCs will be expensive.
Karma13612
(4,555 posts)Alas, it appears his EOs may be a weak bandaid meant to sooth the broken hearts of Americans.
But, we need to get our Legislators to do the heavy lifting. Was hoping the NRA would be sufficiently weakened by now to finally break thru their influence in DC.
Well, I can dream!