Sotomayor blasts Kavanaugh's decision on juvenile life sentences
Source: the hill
By John Kruzel - 04/22/21 03:36 PM EDT
Justice Sonia Sotomayor in a blistering dissent Thursday hammered a 6-3 decision penned by Justice Brett Kavanaugh that rejected certain limits on juvenile life sentences.
Joined by her two fellow liberal justices, Sotomayor accused the conservative majority of abandoning past rulings while pretending to respect them and even used one of Kavanaughs previous opinions against him as a cudgel.
Such an abrupt break from precedent demands special justification, Sotomayor wrote, quoting a decision Kavanaugh wrote last term, adding: The Court offers none.
Ruling along ideological lines, the court on Thursday rejected a challenge to life sentences without parole issued to juveniles, affirming a Mississippi court's sentence of Brett Jones, who at age 15 murdered his grandfather.
..................
Read more: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/549813-sotomayor-blasts-kavanaughs-decision-on-juvenile-life-sentences
Link to tweet
?s=20
Link to tweet
?s=20
Link to tweet
?s=20
Link to tweet
?s=20
BootinUp
(51,035 posts)Alpeduez21
(2,017 posts)Due to your selfishness we are going to suffer at the hands of judges for fucking DECADES!!
Grasswire2
(13,849 posts)The electorate handed power to Dems. If it isn't used, the republic will be lost in another year.
Polybius
(21,631 posts)Takes 60 votes.
JustAnotherGen
(37,771 posts)Who cry babied up at his hearing about how what he did as a teenager shouldn't be held against him.
Let that sink in.
He's a smug evil piece of shit.
OldBaldy1701E
(10,638 posts)It is a damn good thing for him that his own attitude was not applied to his teenaged self. But of course, daddy was there to get him out of trouble. And, he is white. What is the percentage of offenders who are not white currently incarcerated? What about not rich? Personally, I would love to see some figures on the comparative wealth of the families of offenders. Because I am betting that the vast majority of them are below a certain income level. Mainly because they could not buy their way out of jail. Pay for Play justice... what a great idea!
NH Ethylene
(31,301 posts)I know. Dream on.
Calista241
(5,633 posts)repeatedly. They can make any argument against him appear super hyper technical, while he can say he's just ruling on the facts of the cases brought before him.
Waste of time IMO.
bucolic_frolic
(54,490 posts)joetheman
(1,450 posts)Mysterian
(6,245 posts)Inquiring minds want to know.
Only people convicted of federal crimes.
