USA Today resists FBI subpoena seeking data of those who read story about agents' killing
Source: Washington Post
The FBI earlier this year tried to obtain records associated with people who accessed an article on USA Todays website about the killing of two FBI agents as they tried to search a Florida apartment sparking a legal fight and once again fueling concerns that federal law enforcement is not following its own guidelines when seeking news outlets data.
The bureaus request to Gannett, which owns USA Today, came in late April but spilled into public view only recently after the company resisted it in court.
FBI agents sent the company a subpoena asking for records, including IP addresses and mobile identification information, of those who accessed a Feb. 2 article about the shooting during a 35-minute window that same day.
The subpoena said the demand related to a criminal investigation and asked USA Today not to disclose its existence indefinitely. It was unclear, though, precisely what the FBI was investigating or how electronic records pointing to those who accessed the story might advance that inquiry. The subpoena, which did not seem to seek readers names, was previously reported by Politico.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/usa-today-fbi-subpoena/2021/06/04/4741213a-c550-11eb-8c18-fd53a628b992_story.html
Seems like a pretty fucking audacious subpoena request to me.
Deminpenn
(15,278 posts)killed the agents wanted to read about the deed in the media. That does happen, but to try and get the names of everyone who read a story is like looking for a very small needle in a very big haystack.
Randomthought
(835 posts)So not so big a number
ck4829
(35,045 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 29, 2021, 11:06 AM - Edit history (1)
The agents were shot from the house, there is no way someone snuck out of the house while it was under a raid, especially after 5 agents were shot.
Critical Race Theory
muriel_volestrangler
(101,306 posts)It still seems a stretch to me - reading the story doesn't seem like evidence you could use in a courtroom t, and neither does it seem particularly useful in narrowing down suspects.
IronLionZion
(45,427 posts)This sounds like overreach unless there was a warrant or something like that we don't know about. It sounds sketchy
twodogsbarking
(9,732 posts)Are they watching? You betcha.
Jopin Klobe
(779 posts)... complete entry will be expected ...
... quietly ...
... and soon ...