Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorro

(15,740 posts)
Sat Jun 5, 2021, 09:57 AM Jun 2021

USA Today resists FBI subpoena seeking data of those who read story about agents' killing

Source: Washington Post

The FBI earlier this year tried to obtain records associated with people who accessed an article on USA Today’s website about the killing of two FBI agents as they tried to search a Florida apartment — sparking a legal fight and once again fueling concerns that federal law enforcement is not following its own guidelines when seeking news outlets’ data.

The bureau’s request to Gannett, which owns USA Today, came in late April but spilled into public view only recently after the company resisted it in court.

FBI agents sent the company a subpoena asking for records, including IP addresses and mobile identification information, of those who accessed a Feb. 2 article about the shooting during a 35-minute window that same day.

The subpoena said the demand related to a criminal investigation and asked USA Today not to disclose its existence “indefinitely.” It was unclear, though, precisely what the FBI was investigating or how electronic records pointing to those who accessed the story might advance that inquiry. The subpoena, which did not seem to seek readers’ names, was previously reported by Politico.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/usa-today-fbi-subpoena/2021/06/04/4741213a-c550-11eb-8c18-fd53a628b992_story.html



Seems like a pretty fucking audacious subpoena request to me.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
USA Today resists FBI subpoena seeking data of those who read story about agents' killing (Original Post) Zorro Jun 2021 OP
Maybe the theory of the subpoena is that whoever Deminpenn Jun 2021 #1
35 minute window from publication Randomthought Jun 2021 #2
I thought it was Huber himself who did the killings ck4829 Jun 2021 #3
Because of that, I wonder if they think they can trace the child porn provider this way muriel_volestrangler Jun 2021 #5
Did AG Garland or any judges sign off on it? IronLionZion Jun 2021 #4
Who has been accessing DU? twodogsbarking Jun 2021 #6
Once the foot is in the door ... Jopin Klobe Jun 2021 #7
slippery slope indeed. n/t dixiegrrrrl Jun 2021 #8

Deminpenn

(15,278 posts)
1. Maybe the theory of the subpoena is that whoever
Sat Jun 5, 2021, 10:12 AM
Jun 2021

killed the agents wanted to read about the deed in the media. That does happen, but to try and get the names of everyone who read a story is like looking for a very small needle in a very big haystack.

ck4829

(35,045 posts)
3. I thought it was Huber himself who did the killings
Sat Jun 5, 2021, 10:17 AM
Jun 2021

Last edited Tue Jun 29, 2021, 11:06 AM - Edit history (1)

The agents were shot from the house, there is no way someone snuck out of the house while it was under a raid, especially after 5 agents were shot.

Critical Race Theory

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
5. Because of that, I wonder if they think they can trace the child porn provider this way
Sat Jun 5, 2021, 03:48 PM
Jun 2021

It still seems a stretch to me - reading the story doesn't seem like evidence you could use in a courtroom t, and neither does it seem particularly useful in narrowing down suspects.

IronLionZion

(45,427 posts)
4. Did AG Garland or any judges sign off on it?
Sat Jun 5, 2021, 01:00 PM
Jun 2021

This sounds like overreach unless there was a warrant or something like that we don't know about. It sounds sketchy

Jopin Klobe

(779 posts)
7. Once the foot is in the door ...
Sun Jun 6, 2021, 02:34 PM
Jun 2021

... complete entry will be expected ...

... quietly ...

... and soon ...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»USA Today resists FBI sub...