Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
Tue Oct 23, 2012, 01:59 PM Oct 2012

I would say the difference between art and porn is

can you display it in front of children? Can you put it in a kindergarten classroom? Can it run on Disney channel? Can it be hung on the walls of a church? Will moms get in their minivans and drive their children to go see it and will they sit there and view it, too?

Now some will say that Michaelangelo's David or Bottacelli's Venus would be considered porn under these guidelines, but guess what? Only in this country. People around the world have brought their children in to see these two masterpieces for centuries.. and the art galleries do not forbid children from entering the museum.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»I would say the differenc...