Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,618 posts)
Wed Jul 7, 2021, 08:26 PM Jul 2021

Slama, GOP leaders launch voter ID petition drive in Nebraska

Source: Omaha World Herald

By Ryan Hoffman

Voters may have the chance to decide for themselves whether they want to see heightened identification requirements to participate in Nebraska elections.

Citizens for Voter ID, a Republican-led group, said Wednesday it filed a petition seeking to place a constitutional amendment on the 2022 ballot. The amendment would implement voter ID in Nebraska, though a copy of the petition was not immediately available Wednesday.

The Nebraska Secretary of State’s Office acknowledged that an initiative petition was filed Wednesday but said it remains confidential for five days following receipt by the sponsor, in this case Citizens for Voter ID.

Backers say the measure — long sought by Republicans in the state — would ensure confidence in elections. Opponents, on the other hand, argue voter ID is a veiled effort to restrict voting.

Read more: https://omaha.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/slama-gop-leaders-launch-voter-id-petition-drive-in-nebraska/article_66129ab3-8d0d-5c89-8d83-33b06a663c84.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Slama, GOP leaders launch voter ID petition drive in Nebraska (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jul 2021 OP
'heightened identification requirements' multigraincracker Jul 2021 #1
The whole voter ID move is a variant of "have you stopped beating your wife yet?" Ford_Prefect Jul 2021 #2
It is also effectively a "Poll tax" in violation of the BumRushDaShow Jul 2021 #4
Boggles the mind moose65 Jul 2021 #3
Better keep an eye on BlueIdaho Jul 2021 #5
Dumb question wryter2000 Jul 2021 #6

Ford_Prefect

(7,895 posts)
2. The whole voter ID move is a variant of "have you stopped beating your wife yet?"
Thu Jul 8, 2021, 06:55 AM
Jul 2021

It falsely presumes a problem which cannot exist on the scale which the proposed solution implies. It also falsely asserts that anyone who would deny this must be in favor of the condition which doesn't exist. In so doing it frames any discussion in terms that never approach arguable facts. Such is the nature of effective propaganda.

BumRushDaShow

(128,905 posts)
4. It is also effectively a "Poll tax" in violation of the
Thu Jul 8, 2021, 11:05 AM
Jul 2021
24th Amendment

Amendment XXIV

Section 1.

The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

Section 2.

The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxxiv


I.e., unless any of the purported "IDs" have no cost, then it's a direct violation of the 24th Amendment. That is what forced a court stay of the law here in PA in 2012, with it eventually being thrown out in court in 2014 because the "Voter ID" had a cost associated due to a requirement to produce a birth certificate (that had a cost) to prove identification.

PA became the laughingstock due to what we expected would be one of the prime agendas of the GQP -



That dumbass GOP House Leader and later Speaker, is now an ex- and eventually resigned last year.

Pennsylvania’s Voter ID Law Found Unconstitutional
January 17, 2014


HARRISBURG – Commonwealth Court Judge Bernard L. McGinley issued an order today permanently blocking the controversial photo identification law that threatened to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters. His ruling can be appealed by the commonwealth."Today was a good day to be a Pennsylvania voter,” said Michael A. Rubin of Arnold & Porter LLP, a member of the plaintiffs’ legal team, which also includes the Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia, the ACLU of Pennsylvania and Advancement Project. “In striking down this law, the court recognized that constitutional rights, especially the most fundamental right to vote, protect us from the government and cannot be taken away on the whim of that government."

In his opinion, Judge McGinley stated that the voter ID law “does not pass constitutional muster because there is no legal, non-burdensome provision of a compliant photo ID to all qualified electors.” He reasoned that the commonwealth’s so-called DOS ID “is fraught with illegalities and dubious authority.” And, most importantly, he found that as to the “[h]undreds of thousands of electors in Pennsylvania [who] lack compliant photo ID, . . . [e]nforcement of the Voter ID Law as to these electors has the effect of disenfranchising them through no fault of their own. Inescapably, the Voter ID Law infringes upon qualified electors’ right to vote.” He also stated, “Disenfranchising voters through no fault of the voter himself is plainly unconstitutional.”

Pennsylvania’s voter ID law, which was passed by the state legislature and signed by Governor Corbett in March of 2012, was one of the most restrictive in the nation and did not allow many commonly used identification cards for voting. Most voters would have been forced to travel to one of only 71 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation locations to obtain state-issued identification. The law especially burdened the elderly, those with limited mobility and disabilities, individuals with fewer resources and the homeless. “All the evidence in the case pointed to hundreds of thousands of registered Pennsylvania voters who do not have IDs. The state is simply unable to get ID into the hands of all the people who needed it.

As voter turnout continues to hit record lows, we need to make sure we do everything we can to increase participation, not deter it,” said Jennifer Clarke, executive director of the Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia.The court’s decision comes after more than 18 months, three trials and a preliminary injunction which prevented the law from going into effect. The state’s expensive and confusing education campaigns have caused extensive confusion for voters over the last year and a half. In 2012 the commonwealth stipulated that it had no evidence of even a single case of voter fraud in Pennsylvania.

https://www.aclupa.org/en/press-releases/pennsylvanias-voter-id-law-found-unconstitutional

moose65

(3,166 posts)
3. Boggles the mind
Thu Jul 8, 2021, 11:02 AM
Jul 2021

Do they really think that Democrats have been committing fraud in Nebraska of all places! Sheesh. If the Democrats WERE committing fraud, shouldn't they be in charge of the state by now?

Where did this voter ID nonsense come from? I think I might have to go down an internet rabbit hole and find out!

wryter2000

(46,039 posts)
6. Dumb question
Thu Jul 8, 2021, 12:34 PM
Jul 2021

Do they have a lot of people in Nebraska who would normally vote Democratic? I don't know how diverse the population is. They don't have any major cities. Off hand, I don't remember the state going to the Dem presidential candidate lately.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Slama, GOP leaders launch...