Startup Claims Breakthrough in Long-Duration Batteries
Source: The Wall Street Journal.
WSJ NEWS EXCLUSIVE
Startup Claims Breakthrough in Long-Duration Batteries
Form Energys iron-air batteries could have big ramifications for storing electricity on the power grid
A new battery from Form Energy uses iron, water and air to store enormous amounts of electricity as in three of its prototypes.
By Russell Gold | Photographs by Philip Keith for The Wall Street Journal
Updated July 22, 2021 8:29 am ET
A four-year-old startup says it has built an inexpensive battery that can discharge power for days using one of the most common elements on Earth: iron.
Form Energy Inc.s batteries are far too heavy for electric cars. But it says they will be capable of solving one of the most elusive problems facing renewable energy: cheaply storing large amounts of electricity to power grids when the sun isnt shining and wind isnt blowing.
The work of the Somerville, Mass., company has long been shrouded in secrecy and nondisclosure agreements. It recently shared its progress with The Wall Street Journal, saying it wants to make regulators and utilities aware that if all continues to go according to plan, its iron-air batteries will be capable of affordable, long-duration power storage by 2025.
Its backers include Breakthrough Energy Ventures, a climate investment fund whose investors include Microsoft Corp. co-founder Bill Gates and Amazon.com Inc. founder Jeff Bezos. Form recently initiated a $200 million funding round, led by a strategic investment from steelmaking giant ArcelorMittal SA, one of the worlds leading iron-ore producers.
Form is preparing to soon be in production of the kind of battery you need to fully retire thermal assets like coal and natural gas power plants, said the companys chief executive, Mateo Jaramillo, who developed Tesla Inc.s Powerwall battery and worked on some of its earliest automotive powertrains.
{snip}
Read more: https://www.wsj.com/articles/startup-claims-breakthrough-in-long-duration-batteries-11626946330
https://twitter.com/russellgold
Russell.Gold@wsj.com
A startup says it has cracked the elusive long-duration battery puzzle
Link to tweet
Mosby
(19,204 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)Boxerfan
(2,557 posts)Because the technology is very old for iron batteries.
Seems odd to call it a scam with zero evidence.
mahatmakanejeeves
(67,893 posts)Not at DU.
Mosby
(19,204 posts)Why is it "shrouded in secrecy"?
Why not file patents for the "breakthrough"?
OnlinePoker
(6,072 posts)Some are for metal/air battery architecture.
paleotn
(21,351 posts)For renewables, cheap, reliable grid storage IS the holy grail. The complete game changer. It's worth trillions. Literally. I can understand the secrecy. Time will tell.
mahatmakanejeeves
(67,893 posts)Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent
Once you file a patent, everyone can see what you're doing, including the unscrupulous, who have no problem with stealing your work.
The formula for Coca-Cola is not patented. If it were, everyone could see what went into it.
Thanks for writing.
MineralMan
(150,469 posts)It's not a completely new technology, either. It sounds like they have refined it, though, through careful research. Sounds promising to me. And cheap to build, since it does not require mining and processing rather rare elements.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,378 posts)What are the specs/price/time to production? Has the tech been examined and verified by independent third parties?
MineralMan
(150,469 posts)There are all sorts of articles about the concept. As for the state of this particular venture, I don't know. According to the developers, they've solved the problem of how many charge/discharge cycles the battery can handle. If they're successful with that, they'll be successful with the battery technology, which is actually very simple and cheap to manufacture.
Would I invest? No. I don't invest in companies at all. I see this as a promising venture, though. I can understand why big investors are putting money behind it.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,378 posts)There are eight key characteristics that govern batteries, and it is a tricky thing to get the right combination of these factors:
1) Specific energy
2) Specific power
3) Cost
4) Cycle life
5) Safety
6) Temp range
7) Toxicity
8) Charging speed
This battery seems great with #1, #3-#5, but the remainder are pretty important if you want to use the batteries for EVs, for example. Without all the specs, this is just another "breakthrough" claim, of which I have read one every other month for the last 15 years. Twixt the lab and factory is a graveyard of "breakthrough" batteries.
mahatmakanejeeves
(67,893 posts)These batteries are for power generation facilities.
OP:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142773419#post28:
28. Remember, these are for grid storage use. IE, non-mobile
These are batteries the size of semi trailers, dozens of them sitting in permanent spots like power plants.
These aren't meant to replace lithium batteries in vehicles.
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Reply #29)
mahatmakanejeeves This message was self-deleted by its author.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,378 posts)high energy density is quite desirable, but high power is as well (the ability to discharge quickly and sustain high power output).
Weight also is obviously less of an issue.
OnlinePoker
(6,072 posts)Seemed to get around the paywall.
pandr32
(13,715 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)bucolic_frolic
(53,658 posts)Iron won't be a toxic form of storage. So there's good news there.
mahatmakanejeeves
(67,893 posts)Full disclosure: I own shares of ArcelorMittal. When I posted the article, I hadn't noticed that ArcelorMittal was involved.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(67,893 posts)This must be one of his final pieces at The Wall Street Journal. He wrote about PGE's plan to bury some of its power lines. That article was apparently his final effort. He now works at Texas Monthly. What sort of power line issues could there be in Texas?
https://twitter.com/TexasMonthly
I'm sure I've linked to a few of his articles at DU.
Best wishes, Mr. Gold.
Link to tweet
(Safeguarding against climate change won't be cheap.)
Link to tweet
Hugin
(37,256 posts)The development on Aluminum 'batteries' using a thimble full of Gallium(?) as a catalyst was what first caught my attention. As, they are lighter in weight and actually provide a stronger impulse reaction than Iron. The down side being they require a much higher thermal energy to 'recharge' the Al by driving off the oxygenation.
It's nice to see someone working on Iron with some success.
The value of these 'Metal Batteries' is they can be cycled directly from a thermal source instead of relying on an electrical current being generated somewhere for a recharge.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,378 posts)I could buy me a Republican senator.
Mr. Sparkle
(3,584 posts)that's where most of these companies run into major problems that are very difficult to solve. So its best to take a await and see approach and see what they bring to the market.
Mr. Evil
(3,432 posts)"I sure hope this works."
speak easy
(12,584 posts)Old Crank
(6,561 posts)A bit more detail on how this works since it was hard to get past the WSJ paywall.
https://formenergy.com/technology/battery-technology/
paleotn
(21,351 posts)Hope they're on to something. If they are, it's a complete game changer. And incredibly cheap. If true, it's worth trillions of $'s, GBP, Euros, Yen, Yuan.....
NickB79
(20,210 posts)These are batteries the size of semi trailers, dozens of them sitting in permanent spots like power plants.
These aren't meant to replace lithium batteries in vehicles.
mahatmakanejeeves
(67,893 posts)Diagram of the TVA pumped storage facility at Raccoon Mountain Pumped-Storage Plant in Tennessee, United States
Shaded-relief topo map of the Taum Sauk pumped storage plant in Missouri, United States. The lake on the mountain is built upon a flat surface, requiring a dam around the entire perimeter.
Pumped-storage hydroelectricity (PSH), or pumped hydroelectric energy storage (PHES), is a type of hydroelectric energy storage used by electric power systems for load balancing. The method stores energy in the form of gravitational potential energy of water, pumped from a lower elevation reservoir to a higher elevation. Low-cost surplus off-peak electric power is typically used to run the pumps. During periods of high electrical demand, the stored water is released through turbines to produce electric power. Although the losses of the pumping process make the plant a net consumer of energy overall, the system increases revenue by selling more electricity during periods of peak demand, when electricity prices are highest. If the upper lake collects significant rainfall or is fed by a river then the plant may be a net energy producer in the manner of a traditional hydroelectric plant.
{snip}
It's not an efficient method of storing energy.