Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Polybius

(15,309 posts)
Mon Sep 27, 2021, 02:37 PM Sep 2021

Supreme Court meets to discuss adding new cases to blockbuster term

Source: CNN

(CNN)Supreme Court justices, on the verge of a new term, will meet behind closed doors on Monday to discuss petitions that have accumulated over the summer and decide which cases should be added to the court's docket.

The private conference comes a week before the new term is set to begin when the justices will take the bench in person for the first time to hear arguments in over a year. The nine justices find themselves under the political spotlight after they allowed on a 5-4 vote a controversial Texas abortion law to go into effect.

Since that decision, several justices have given public remarks attempting to bolster the court's institutional legitimacy and arguing that they view cases according to their judicial philosophy and not from any political affiliation. But recent polls show the public -- particularly Democrats -- are souring on the court.

Already, the term -- set to start October 4 -- will be a blockbuster one as the justices will hear a significant Second Amendment case concerning a New York conceal carry law in November, followed by a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade in December.


Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/27/politics/scotus-new-cases-blockbuster-term/index.html



13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court meets to discuss adding new cases to blockbuster term (Original Post) Polybius Sep 2021 OP
The end of Democracy BradAllison Sep 2021 #1
And the right wing ruling will be under the guise of saving democracy.nt Javaman Sep 2021 #13
We need term l retirement dates at 75 years BlueJac Sep 2021 #2
Age-based forced retirement? Or years-served term limits? NurseJackie Sep 2021 #7
20 years on the Supreme Court is something I could go with rpannier Sep 2021 #10
SCOTUS needs ethical guidelines as law RainCaster Sep 2021 #3
Time to reorganize the court. BlueIdaho Sep 2021 #4
As if they haven't done enough damage. SallyHemmings Sep 2021 #5
How're they going to get that done with two Dem holdouts in the Senate Texin Sep 2021 #8
My son fears that Obergefell v. Hodges is in danger of being overturned... NurseJackie Sep 2021 #6
I completely agree.. mountain grammy Sep 2021 #9
A Distinction Without A Differece DallasNE Sep 2021 #11
Living here in Texas... Javaman Sep 2021 #12

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
7. Age-based forced retirement? Or years-served term limits?
Mon Sep 27, 2021, 04:16 PM
Sep 2021

With age comes wisdom, and I think it would be a mistake to choose and arbitrary number that someone considers to be "too old" to serve effectively. And if that were the case, then it would only encourage the appointment of exceedingly young (and inexperienced) judges.

There are a lot of interesting ideas out there. My favorite is to increase the number of judges to 13.

rpannier

(24,323 posts)
10. 20 years on the Supreme Court is something I could go with
Mon Sep 27, 2021, 07:41 PM
Sep 2021

I have to admit, it is something Ted Cruz proposed

RainCaster

(10,790 posts)
3. SCOTUS needs ethical guidelines as law
Mon Sep 27, 2021, 03:19 PM
Sep 2021

Right now, they are allowed to accept gifts from anyone, including parties that might be seen by the court. Speaking engagements are also allowed. Use of private jets, fancy hotels & resorts, so many things that the House & Senate are not allowed to accept.

BlueIdaho

(13,582 posts)
4. Time to reorganize the court.
Mon Sep 27, 2021, 03:40 PM
Sep 2021

The Roberts partisan kangaroo court is no longer serving America’s interests. Increase the number of judges and rotate them on a case by case basis.

SallyHemmings

(1,818 posts)
5. As if they haven't done enough damage.
Mon Sep 27, 2021, 03:45 PM
Sep 2021

Time to add to the court.

We are well past the time for playing by the rules.

Turtles just shoves them up our collective backsides.


NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
6. My son fears that Obergefell v. Hodges is in danger of being overturned...
Mon Sep 27, 2021, 04:05 PM
Sep 2021

My son fears that Obergefell v. Hodges is in danger of being overturned... or weakened to the point where it becomes "optional" for anyone who wants to claim a deeply-held religious belief.

He's a new father of two, so I can understand his anxiety.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obergefell_v._Hodges

mountain grammy

(26,594 posts)
9. I completely agree..
Mon Sep 27, 2021, 04:49 PM
Sep 2021

with

Who knows what we'll be when the religious fanatics on the SC are finished with us.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
11. A Distinction Without A Differece
Mon Sep 27, 2021, 10:32 PM
Sep 2021

"several justices have given public remarks attempting to bolster the court's institutional legitimacy and arguing that they view cases according to their judicial philosophy and not from any political affiliation.".

Roberts has lost control of the court. Cases should not be based on judicial philosophy anyway. They should be based on the law and Constitution, not what they mold the Constitution into. That should be the only judicial philosophy - their mission statement. And it is a clear repudiation of Stare Decisis.

Javaman

(62,490 posts)
12. Living here in Texas...
Wed Sep 29, 2021, 08:12 AM
Sep 2021

We are already experiencing the future of this nation. Proto-fascism

This is what’s coming nationally.

I fear the 2022 elections.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court meets to di...