Federal grand jury indicts Rep. Jeff Fortenberry on charges of lying to investigators
Source: Washington Post
A federal grand jury has indicted Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.) on charges of lying to federal investigators about his campaign contributions.
The congressman, who was elected in 2004, said he expected to be indicted.
The federal grand jury charged him with one count of scheming to falsify and conceal material facts and two counts of making false statements to federal investigators looking into illegal contributions to his 2016 campaign, according to the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Central District of California.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal-grand-jury-indicts-rep-jeff-fortenberry-on-charges-of-lying-to-investigators-about-campaign-contributions/2021/10/19/808add1a-311f-11ec-9241-aad8e48f01ff_story.html
Full headline: Federal grand jury indicts Rep. Jeff Fortenberry on charges of lying to investigators about campaign contributions
Short article.
bucolic_frolic
(54,487 posts)OAITW r.2.0
(31,731 posts)It's what today's Republican Party does.
BumRushDaShow
(167,127 posts)I had found and posted this in the earlier thread anticipating this indictment - https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=2815003
(Ack! Omaha Steve self-deleted his OP - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142814993 apparently because it hadn't happened yet - until now)
But here is what I had about the Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire behind the scenes funneling the money -

The DOJ settlement doc is here - https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/lebanese-nigerian-billionaire-and-two-associates-resolve-federal-probe-alleged
I was trying to find out what other campaigns he gave to and found this - https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/04/straw-donor-scheme-foreign-billionaire/

The original articles were mentioning "4 GOP" members involved but had only mentioned 2 names - Fortenberry & Terry. OpenSecrets also included Rmoney and Issa as the other 2.
OAITW r.2.0
(31,731 posts)Are these pass-thru PACs? Sure looks like it.
BumRushDaShow
(167,127 posts)there were various people & orgs (like PACs) in California who took the funding and then "distributed it".
OAITW r.2.0
(31,731 posts)Supreme Court majority wants to keep in place. Boggles my mind the impunity in which Republicans will violate Federal election law with regards to funding disclosure. A clear and present danger to our Country's survival.
BumRushDaShow
(167,127 posts)after the SCOTUS tossed it out with the Citizen's United ruling, and made "corporations" into "people".
They should have been able to revise that law to pass muster and end this madness.
Champp
(2,409 posts)Something we can - alas - always depend upon.
11 Bravo
(24,292 posts)SouthBayDem
(33,187 posts)Hassler
(4,818 posts)niyad
(130,454 posts)dchill
(42,660 posts)Oh, well then. Never mind! No harm, no foul.
Rhiannon12866
(252,158 posts)BumRushDaShow
(167,127 posts)Getting ahead of the news cycle.
Rhiannon12866
(252,158 posts)Adding. I think Chris Hayes is underrated.
LetMyPeopleVote
(176,690 posts)pwb
(12,549 posts)He thought trump was king forever and would allow such things. oops.
