House passes $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill, sends it to Biden
Source: CNBC
The House passed a more than $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill on Friday, sending it to President Joe Bidens desk in a critical step toward enacting sprawling Democratic economic plans.
The Senate approved the revamp of transportation, utilities and broadband in August. The legislations passage is perhaps the unified Democratic governments most concrete achievement since it approved a $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package in the spring.
The measure passed in a 228-206 vote. Thirteen Republicans supported it, while six Democrats voted against it. Biden could sign the bill within days.
Washington has tried and failed for years to pass a major bill to upgrade critical transportation and utility infrastructure, which has come under more pressure from extreme weather. The White House has also contended passage of the bill can help to get goods moving as supply-chain obstacles contribute to higher prices for American consumers.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/05/house-passes-bipartisan-infrastructure-bill-sends-it-to-biden.html
Changed the source. For some reason MSNBC had it as a $555 billion bill but CNBC and CNN have got it as $1+ trilion
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,695 posts)RussBLib
(9,044 posts)Now Dems need to LOUDLY take credit for this one.
And get the other one across the finish line
The media won't do it for us, so we have to CROW about this bill and get on the airwaves as much as possible, always using the words WIN and BIDEN together!!!
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)madaboutharry
(40,236 posts)but I think the democrats who voted against the bill were wrong. And Im getting weary of The Squad. They are not helping.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)They think more highly of themselves than they should. And a couple of Senators, as well.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,741 posts)Hekate
(90,883 posts)Pramila Jayapal is head of the Progressive Caucus, which she points out is 96 members. She held them together tonight all except the renegade Squad.
lamp_shade
(14,848 posts)obamanut2012
(26,161 posts)llmart
(15,557 posts)The media is always looking for a "Dems in disarray" theme and The Squad gave it to them.
Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)If their constituents keep voting them in, I can't say a whole lot.
IronLionZion
(45,575 posts)as the squad has stated all along, they won't be the ones who stop the bill from passing.
question everything
(47,547 posts)It would have showed, then, that the Democrats can govern.
At least, it puts us on a better starting point for the midterm which really will start in less then two months.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,686 posts)At least Dems have sown up the coal miner vote
SCantiGOP
(13,874 posts)The BBB will pass, even though it will get dinged a bit in the Senate, and the American public will get to watch the Republicans sit on their asses for another crucial piece of legislation.
murielm99
(30,778 posts)politics is the art of compromise. That is the way I learned it. Otto von Bismarck was the one who called it the art of the possible. Do we want HIS example to follow in a democracy? I don't think so.
Gingrich nixed the idea of fraternization across the aisle. We need to get back to that and we will. Because politics is the art of compromise.
The republicans have been getting away with very undemocratic things for a while. We will bring things back to where they should be: the art of compromise.
Evita is one of my favorite musicals. The Art of the Possible is sung in that play. Here are the lyrics:
One has no rules/is not precise/One rarely acts/The same way twice/One spurns no device/Practicing the art of the possible.
One always picks/The easy fight/One praises fools/One smothers light/One shifts from left to right/It's part of the art of the possible.
One always claims/Mistakes were planned/When risk is slight/One takes one's stand/With much sleight of hand/Politics - The art of the possible.
That is how it is done in a Peron-style right wing dictatorship. That is not who we are. That is not how Nancy or Joe do things. They do some horse trading and calling in of favors, but they practice diplomacy and compromise because we are a democracy.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,686 posts)Negotiating compromises with supporters of the Big Lie and the insurrection is a very bad idea.
It would mean treating Gaetz, Jordan, Gomert, MTG, Boebert, Brooks, Hawley and Cruz as serious, sane people worthy of respect.
Beyond those crazies, NONE of the republicans have shown a willingness to even allow debate on important bills- how do you negotiate with that?
George II
(67,782 posts)What's this "coal miner vote" stuff?
Fiendish Thingy
(15,686 posts)Like paid leave and Medicare expansion and universal pre k, substantive action on climate change and lower prescription drug prices
? All those things that arent in the BIF?
What the BIF provides is $550 billion in new money to correct 75 years of deferred maintenance on the nations physical infrastructure- a good thing, but for a child in poverty, not nearly enough.
The BIF provides funding for projects heavily connected to the fossil fuel industry, hence the coal miners are sure to vote for Dems in the midterms, amirite?
honest.abe
(8,685 posts)It didnt work and the result is now a bunch of angry folks like yourself.
OAITW r.2.0
(24,679 posts)NBachers
(17,152 posts)Here are the six House Democrats who broke from their party to vote against the bill:
Rep. Jamaal Bowman of New York
Rep. Cori Bush of Missouri
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York
Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota
Rep. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts
Rep. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan
https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/05/politics/infrastructure-bill-house-democrats-voted-no-republicans-voted-yes/index.html
OnDoutside
(19,982 posts)that money will be spent in their district ? Is their vote position any better than the conservadems ? Infantile.
obamanut2012
(26,161 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....their fellow progressives.
The Congressional Progressive Caucus is made up of 95 Representatives and one Senator. ALL the other members of the CPC voted for the bill (including the Senator weeks ago), those six did not. Instead they sided WITH 200 House republicans.
Geez this finally passed. Hope it's a good start to getting things done.
Rhiannon12866
(206,332 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,839 posts)brer cat
(24,628 posts)Now get BBB across the line.
Polybius
(15,512 posts)Would it had made a difference? Hard to say.
orangecrush
(19,646 posts)Thanks to all who helped make it happen.
littlemissmartypants
(22,839 posts)House votes *228*-206, with 13 Republicans joining Dems.
Bill now goes to the White House.
Link to tweet
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,320 posts)KY_EnviroGuy
(14,498 posts)Good point regarding weakened infrastructure due to worsening weather and better broadband to stay competitive in the world.
......to Speaker Pelosi and President Biden.
ananda
(28,887 posts)!!!
gademocrat7
(10,677 posts)Thank you Speaker Pelosi for your efforts in getting this bill passed.
LaMouffette
(2,042 posts)to wake up to!
Now, Democratic leadership, it's all about messaging, messaging, messaging! This needs to be trumpeted as loudly and as often as the Repubes have been spreading the Critical Race Theory lie, the Stop the Steal lie, and the Democrats Want to Take Your Guns lie, and the Economy Is in Bad Shape lie.
We need TV commercials and YouTube ads, dammit! Spread the positive news! Spread it! Brand the Democrats, once again, as the party of "Yes, We Can!" Brand the Republicans as the party of fear mongers.
Thank you, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris, and all the Dems who supported the bill, along with the few Repubes who did, too.
GO, DEMS!
honest.abe
(8,685 posts)And I still think there will be a BBB despite all the hand wringing from some on our side.
George II
(67,782 posts)republicans who voted with the majority of Democrats:
Van Drew
Katko
Bacon
Young
Upton
Kinzinger
Smith (N.J.)
Fitzpatrick
Reed
Gonzalez
Garbarino
Malliotakis
McKinley
Democrats who voted with the majority of republicans:
Bush
Omar
Bowman
Tlaib
Ocasio-Cortez
Pressley
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,320 posts)It's easier for them to vote yes for that reason.
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)Bayard
(22,184 posts)For those who thought Cheney had seen the light--not so much.
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)yaesu
(8,020 posts)voters rights! Lets get real, we are about to see our first trillionaire in the US, the electric car rocketman, so a trillion dollars isn't going to make me too excited but hey, I'm used to settling for crumbs.
Aristus
(66,481 posts)The thirteen Republicans are at least smart enough to realize that this will benefit their constituents, and they can run for re-election on the result of those benefits.
Meanwhile, the six Democrats are running away from Joe Biden's agenda so they can claim 'electoral independence' from the President in their next campaign.
Cowards...
Polybius
(15,512 posts)Her Instagram is off the charts in negative comments, calling her a traitor, sellout, and RINO.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CV6UvXvLssV/
bucolic_frolic
(43,375 posts)To me it's a sign the parties are beginning to cooperate again, which they have done historically. Everyone got something. Progressives got their further left agenda, 13 Republicans added to their center-right creds and Democrats got to say this is bipartisan and Republicans can point to it's not an entirely united Democratic Party, in fact it wouldn't have passed without them.
SunSeeker
(51,748 posts)TiberiusB
(490 posts)Pelosi betrayed a commitment to pass both bills together, undoubtedly under pressure from the administration to pass something to counter bad poll numbers.
https://www.newsweek.com/bowing-progressives-pelosi-says-infrastructure-will-pass-once-dems-agree-spending-bill-1634939
Did that happen? Is the BBB bill set to pass? Obviously, no. Say goodbye to BBB. It's going to get gutted even more, and whatever shell of a bill passes, it won't have any of the winning elements that people were demanding. The "Squad" as many here derisively call them, were standing on their principles and holding to the commitment they made to Biden's agenda. The BIF was their leverage, which just got thrown away, so don't expect BBB to suddenly win over the Dem holdouts.
Do people actually think that these progressives voted the way they did because they are "infantile" or spiteful? They were letting their constituents see that they weren't simply going to capitulate to the corporate wing of the party and pass a corporate friendly giveaway masquerading as a bold infrastructure bill. The BIF is not a 1.2 trillion dollar infrastructure bill. Only 550 million of it is new infrastructure spending, and much of that is funded by diverting funds from other programs, like unspent Covid relief. Despite that, the bill isn't even paid for, which Manchin, shockingly, isn't bothered by.
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/568416-the-infrastructure-bill-will-increase-the-debt-stop-telling-americans
That money will be spread out over multiple projects for roads, bridges, mass transit, broadband, water projects and the electric grid. That's only a tiny fraction of what's needed, and counting on future bills to make up the difference seems...unrealistic...to say the least.
Worse, it's just a massive corporate giveaway of public assets.
https://prospect.org/politics/bipartisan-senate-infrastructure-plan-privatization-asset-recycling/
How about billions in Oil industry giveaways?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-06/biden-s-agenda-is-tainted-by-oil-interests-say-climate-advocates
Does anyone really believe that over a dozen republicans, including Mitch McConnell, would back any bill that wasn't in their interest? They gathered enough votes to counter any progressive push back, but let enough of their members vote "no" to avoid any backlash from conservative voters.
None of the progressives "sided" with the Republicans. When Schumer voted "no" on the voting rights bill, was he siding with Republicans? They put up a last ditch effort to protect the BBB bill and get it passed. Obviously. It seems that actively using whatever leverage you can muster to protect and advance your President's proclaimed agenda, one originally targeted at the citizenry of the U.S. and not the donor class, is deeply offensive to some. Good grief, desperation for a "win" does not make for rational discourse, or policy.
LudwigPastorius
(9,197 posts)We call them the "Squad because that is the name AOC bestowed upon them in one of her Instagram posts.
https://thehill.com/homenews/House/416370-ocasio-cortez-shares-photo-of-her-new-squad-on-capitol-hill
TiberiusB
(490 posts)I'm not referring to the nickname per se, more the tone used when the group is brought up in these discussions, along with a press corp that often pulls it out as a way to point the finger at those troublesome progressives.
WestIndianArchie
(386 posts)It's just not enough money.
honest.abe
(8,685 posts)It didnt work and only resulted in pissing off a bunch of progressives and dividing the party. Both bills should have lived or died on their own merit. The result would have been much better and we might still have a Dem Gov in VA.
Demsrule86
(68,731 posts)honest.abe
(8,685 posts)That confirms its good legislation.