HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Supreme Court declines to...

Mon Dec 13, 2021, 04:25 PM

Supreme Court declines to block New York vaccine mandate

Source: CNN

(CNN)The Supreme Court turned away two emergency requests Monday from health care workers, doctors and nurses in New York to block the state's vaccine mandate.

Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas dissented.

The dispute arose when three nurses and a group called We the Patriots USA, Inc, challenged the mandate, arguing that it allowed exemptions for those with medical objections but not for people with religious objections.

The rule, which is currently in effect, covers workers in hospitals and nursing homes, home health agencies, adult centers as well as hospices. Several doctors who say they have treated many patients with Covid filed a separate request with the justices.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/13/politics/supreme-court-new-york-vaccine-mandate/index.html

6 replies, 1665 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 6 replies Author Time Post
Reply Supreme Court declines to block New York vaccine mandate (Original post)
Polybius Dec 2021 OP
Raftergirl Dec 2021 #1
PJMcK Dec 2021 #2
Initech Dec 2021 #3
Alexander Of Assyria Dec 2021 #5
Alexander Of Assyria Dec 2021 #4
JohnSJ Dec 2021 #6

Response to Polybius (Original post)

Mon Dec 13, 2021, 04:29 PM

1. Good.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Polybius (Original post)

Mon Dec 13, 2021, 04:46 PM

2. Good

Enough of the ignorance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Polybius (Original post)

Mon Dec 13, 2021, 05:51 PM

3. I'm getting seriously tired of these morons.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Reply #3)

Mon Dec 13, 2021, 07:13 PM

5. I hear you...that 3 justices would think health professionals could choose not to be

vaccinated and still work at their science jobs is moronic.

Should be no brainer but 3 nobrainers sit there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Polybius (Original post)

Mon Dec 13, 2021, 07:09 PM

4. Science 1, Religion 0

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Polybius (Original post)

Tue Dec 14, 2021, 07:53 AM

6. It is even worse. Gorsuch and Alito were arguing on lies and false information. They stated in

their dissent that those wanting the exemption were NOT anti-vax, but just against the Covid vaccine, because it is from "fetal blood lines" from the 70's. That is a lie. It is TESTING that was done on those vaccines in the early development against those cell lines that were used to determine their feasibility, but the actual vaccine manufactured is NOT derived from any "fetal blood lines".

That Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas choice to accept the false premise demonstrates just how unhinged they are.

Some of the following over the counter medicines that were TESTED on derivative cell lines:

Advil, Aleve, Benadryl, Claritin, Ibuprofen, Motrin, Robitussin, Sudafed, Tylenol, Colace Lidocaine, Maalox, Mucinex, Mepyramine, Pepto-Bismol, Preparation H, Senna, Tums, Atorvastatin, Azithromycin, Amlodipine, Albuterol, Cerivastain, Canagliflozin, Dapagliflozin, Enbrel, Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Levothyroxin, Losartan, Lisinopril, Metformin, Metoprolol, Oxbryta, Omeprazole, Remdesivir, Simvastatin, Sacubitril, Tenapanor

In other words, the use of fetal cell lines is very "common" in TESTING for many modern medicines

We have three SC justices who are out of their minds, and living in the dark ages. If it were up to these three SC judges views, a lot of medicines would be banned.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread