Fox News loses bid to dismiss Dominion's $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit
Source: Reuters
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Fox News Network on Thursday lost an effort to dismiss a $1.6 billion lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems Inc, a voting machine company that says the television network defamed it by amplifying conspiracy theories about its technology.
In a written ruling, Delaware court judge Eric Davis said Dominion had sufficiently alleged it was defamed by Fox News' election coverage and the case should proceed toward trial.
(Reporting by Jan Wolfe in Washington and Helen Coster in New York; editing by Diane Craft)
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/fox-news-loses-bid-to-dismiss-dominions-16-billion-defamation-lawsuit/ar-AARTqX3?ocid=uxbndlbing
durablend
(7,472 posts)Fox isn't having a good week, is it?
LetMyPeopleVote
(146,403 posts)This makes me smile
Link to tweet
The judge wrote, If the plaintiff offers some direct evidence that the statement was probably false, the Court can infer that the defendant inten[ded] to avoid the truth.
Fox News said in a statement, Fox News, along with every single news organization across the country, vigorously covered the breaking news surrounding the unprecedented 2020 election, providing full context of every story with in-depth reporting and clear-cut analysis. We remain committed to defending against this baseless lawsuit and its all-out assault on the First Amendment.
Budi
(15,325 posts)Go get em!
Budi
(15,325 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)They know psy ops work.
Justice matters.
(6,971 posts)Escurumbele
(3,430 posts)They will file for bankruptcy, change the name of the "news" organization and that is it.
FakeNoose
(33,061 posts)They call themselves a "news" broadcaster but they clearly are the public relations wing of the Repuke Party.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,612 posts)How many times does this have to be posted here on DU, there is no FCC license to operate on cable, satellite or the internet, matter of fact, there is no license at all, the FCC is expressly forbidden by law to regulate any content with regards to these venues.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,514 posts)due to their non-stop lying and deceiving of the public relating to healthcare, gun regulation and COVID to name a few.
KY.....
LoisB
(7,302 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(146,403 posts)Now discovery can commence and this will be fun to watch
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(10,175 posts)ShazzieB
(16,772 posts)Of course, Faux Noise would move to get the suit dismissed. That's usually the first step with these things. Even if they know the motion will probably be denied, the attempt will almost always be made in a lawsuit like this.
Yay for the judge for making the right decision!
azureblue
(2,163 posts)Since Fox once dodged a suit by legally establishing that they are "entertainment", can this be used against them in this case? IOW, they can't hide behind Freedom of the Press"?
Repeated often. But Fox never "dodged" a suit by establishing the it is entertainment.
Usually, this myth is based on a Florida case that didn't even involve Fox News.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/fox-skews/
Sometimes its based on a defamation case involving Tucker Carlson in which the court held that his particular comments were opinion commentary and thus not the basis for a defamation suit. The word "entertainment' never appears in the decision.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,775 posts)monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)damn, got a nice ring to it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hibbing
(10,122 posts)Evolve Dammit
(16,910 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(146,403 posts)BlueWavePsych
(2,642 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(146,403 posts)I am amused by Fox News having a bad week
Link to tweet
On Wednesday Fox's social media team was forced to delete an antisemitic cartoon after advocacy groups shamed the network. And today, Thursday, Fox was set back in court in a big way. As Katelyn Polantz reports here, "a judge in Delaware has found that Fox News' coverage of election fraud after the 2020 election may have been inaccurate, and is allowing a major defamation case against the right-wing TV network to move forward."
"The ruling will now allow Dominion to attempt to unearth extensive communications within Fox News as they gather evidence for the case, and the company may be able to interview the network's top names under oath," Polantz explains.
For that reason, some media writers are speculating that the network will now try to settle, lest it be subjected to the embarrassment of the discovery process. "Fox loses the key motion; cases often settle at this point," Ben Smith tweeted, "and a settlement here would likely be a big number. It's a very strong case."