Pro-Beijing candidates sweep Hong Kong elections
Source: McClatchy
HONG KONG -- Candidates loyal to Chinas Communist Party won a landslide victory in Hong Kongs legislative elections after pro-democracy activists were imprisoned and authorities received the power to exclude those deemed inappropriate for office.
Candidates loyal to Beijing won a majority of the seats in Sunday's election after the laws were changed to ensure that only pro-Beijing patriots could run the city.
Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam said during a news conference Monday she was satisfied with the election despite a 30.2% voter turnout the lowest since the British handed Hong Kong over to China in 1997.
She said that the number of registered voters reached 92.5%, a record high compared to the 2012 and 2016 elections, when around 70% of voters had registered.
Read more: https://www.star-telegram.com/news/politics-government/national-politics/article256729272.html
Link is to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)... in scare quotes. Same with Iran's "elections".
twodogsbarking
(9,784 posts)dem4decades
(11,300 posts)For at least a few years anyway.
But it's coming.
oldsoftie
(12,582 posts)You jackass.
DFW
(54,426 posts)Oops, in the case of the communist Chinese, everything!
Not so anti-kommanist, after all, there, Margie, are you? NOW whatcha gonna call your enemies? Sounds like you're gonna have to go back to just plain "libbruls."
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)Votes are only for the one party be it Communist or GOP.
pecosbob
(7,542 posts)HUAJIAO
(2,395 posts)On the other hand, it's not communism that is at fault so much as authoritarianism.
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)When you determine who can run and who can campaign. And when you also count the votes.
Crazyleftie
(458 posts)JohnSJ
(92,320 posts)gab13by13
(21,378 posts)The oligarchs know how to create autocracies, let people vote and then they count the votes. They end up with an autocratic dictatorship and can call it democratic, just where the US is heading. Not enough is said about the American oligarchs behind the slide to our autocracy. We moan and groan about the MSM and blame the news anchors who are only reading from scripts prepared by the oligarchs. MSNBC is owned by Comcast whose 2 main share holders are Vanguard and BlackRock.
Listen to real progressive news on the internet or on Sirius radio and you will see the difference between real news and oligarchs controlling the narrative.
Slammer
(714 posts)"MSNBC is owned by Comcast whose 2 main share holders are Vanguard and BlackRock."
Together, they own just over 15% of the shares of Comcast. That's a lot of money, but it's not like a controlling interest. Or control, even if they both wanted exactly the same thing all the time.
Out of curiosity, I'd like to read sources which you consider to be real progressive news on the internet.
If you could provide me with several links, I'd be grateful.
chia
(2,244 posts)turbinetree
(24,710 posts)So they continue to support this bullshit......greed is just more fucking important......
Why didn't Carrie Lam who is still a traitor to democracy....in her fuzzy math 30.2% equates to 92.5%.nothing more than a puppet....
Really need to boycott the Olympics......they will just reinforce this bullshit.... right along with NBC....money...
bluestarone
(17,011 posts)America!! THEY have to be STOPPED! VOTE like there is no tomorrow!
C Moon
(12,219 posts)Slammer
(714 posts)...wait, wrong country.
Nevermind.
Javaman
(62,532 posts)llashram
(6,265 posts)...
pecosbob
(7,542 posts)Actually, I find both of these guys a bit annoying at times, but they deal straight poker on China. They both have Chinese spouses and operated a small motorcycle repair business in China. Together they traveled across much of China and made some documentaries about it. Both have been forced to leave since then and host a podcast.
https://www.youtube.com/c/ADVChina
Today's podcast is about China's crappy bridges and roads.