Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(36,903 posts)
Mon Feb 7, 2022, 09:33 AM Feb 2022

National Archives had to retrieve Trump White House records from Mar-a-Lago

Source: WaPo

The recovery of multiple boxes from Trump’s Florida resort, including letters from Barack Obama and Kim Jong Un, underscores the previous administration’s cavalier handling of presidential records

President Donald Trump improperly removed multiple boxes from the White House that were retrieved by the National Archives and Records Administration last month from his Mar-a-Lago residence because they contained documents and other items that should have been turned over to the agency, according to three people familiar with the visit.

The recovery of the boxes from Trump’s Florida resort raises new concerns about his adherence to the Presidential Records Act, which requires the preservation of memos, letters, notes, emails, faxes and other written communications related to a president’s official duties.

Trump advisers deny any nefarious intent and said the boxes contained mementos, gifts, letters from world leaders and other correspondence. The items included correspondence with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, which Trump once described as “love letters,” as well as a letter left for his successor by President Barack Obama, according to two people familiar with the contents.

Discussions between the Archives and the former president’s lawyers that began last year resulted in the transfer of the records in January, according to one person familiar with the conversations. Another person familiar with the materials said Trump advisers discussed what had to be returned in December. People familiar with the transfer, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to reveal internal details.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/07/trump-records-mar-a-lago/

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JohnSJ

(92,456 posts)
1. Recall when Sandy Berger took documents out, and not only was the media all over that for weeks, but
Mon Feb 7, 2022, 09:36 AM
Feb 2022

he also had to pay a fine for doing so.

It will be interesting what happens with the king of the republicans in regard to this




gab13by13

(21,445 posts)
2. Is that a rhetorical question?
Mon Feb 7, 2022, 09:51 AM
Feb 2022

The documents have been gone over by now by Trump's lawyers, nothing of interest will be found, and even if it is, so what?

Ford_Prefect

(7,925 posts)
3. You're ignoring the obvious question of why some of those documents were in
Mon Feb 7, 2022, 10:05 AM
Feb 2022

Mar-A-Lago in the first place. The ones which were not there for sentimental reasons.

Why some of those had not been destroyed is the larger question as I see it.

Perhaps you may recall a certain file cabinet full of important and official Trump organization documents and receipts which was recovered from a certain basement in New York?

JohnSJ

(92,456 posts)
4. The fact that he took those documents, was it legal? It wasn't legal in the Berger case, and he
Mon Feb 7, 2022, 10:30 AM
Feb 2022

was charged and fined

They made a huge deal out of it, and we all know what they did to Hillary


thesquanderer

(11,996 posts)
10. One difference: Those docs (as your post says) were classified.
Mon Feb 7, 2022, 12:57 PM
Feb 2022

Since the president has the authority to decide what is and is not classified (and Trump was still president when he removed the items), they are no longer "classified" if he doesn't want them to be... if, in fact, any of them wee classified docs in the first place, which they may not have been.

nuxvomica

(12,452 posts)
6. The documents are important but I also want to know about the "gifts"
Mon Feb 7, 2022, 10:40 AM
Feb 2022

And whether they were from foreign entities and if they exceeded the $375 limit.

Bayard

(22,181 posts)
11. Aren't these things tracked, and recorded?
Mon Feb 7, 2022, 02:10 PM
Feb 2022

Is there any way some of them were, "lost", on the way to FL?

I am quite surprised the letter from Obama wasn't immediately shredded.

Chainfire

(17,663 posts)
13. The important question is this; what would happen to a White House clerk who took historic
Mon Feb 7, 2022, 04:08 PM
Feb 2022

documents home to keep as mementos of their White House employment?

IcyPeas

(21,916 posts)
14. But her emails
Mon Feb 7, 2022, 05:43 PM
Feb 2022

They accused Hillary of deleting emails. But they are the ones destroying documents.

Lock him up.

Linda Ed

(493 posts)
15. Just like his dinner with the Chinese president and surround people
Mon Feb 7, 2022, 07:17 PM
Feb 2022

he had at Mar a Lago showing or sharing national security information...Those papers should never leave the white house to a presidents home or place of business!! Should be federally prosecuted IMO...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»National Archives had to ...