We don't know much about the DOJ's Jan. 6 inquiry. Here are 4 things we do know.
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: Washington Post
snip..........
First, the criticism that the Justice Department has decided not to go after defeated former president Donald Trump is, from all appearances, false. The department continues to reaffirm it has not ruled out going after anyone. A grand jury, the New York Times reports, is already asking for records about people who organized or spoke at several pro-Trump rallies after the election, including two events before Jan. 6. It is also seeking records about anyone who provided security at those events and about those who were deemed to be V.I.P. attendees. The grand jury has also requested evidence about any members of the executive and legislative branches who may have taken part in planning or executing the rallies, or tried to obstruct, influence, impede or delay the certification of the presidential election. Ostensibly, that would include Trump and former vice president Mike Pence.
snip...........
Second, none of this means that the Justice Department is acting with a sufficient sense of urgency. The rationale that the feds have to start at the bottom and work their way up as though this were a Mafia case makes no sense.
Prosecutors go after foot soldiers if they have no real proof the kingpin has engaged in criminal activity. But the former president has shouted from the rooftops that he wanted Pence to overturn the election. And there is an audio recording of Trump trying to twist the Georgia secretary of states arm to find just enough votes to flip his states results. Former senior advisers have written books, blabbed in TV interviews and testified before the Jan. 6 committee concerning communications with Trump and other senior advisers.
snip..............
Third, there is one investigation of which the Justice Department is properly deferring to a state prosecutor. Fani Willis, the district attorney in Fulton County, Ga., has impaneled a grand jury to investigate Trumps pressure campaign against secretary of state Brad Raffensperger to manipulate the Georgias vote totals.
snip..........
Finally, it doesnt really matter whether the Jan. 6 committee makes a referral to the Justice Department suggesting criminal prosecution. A referral, although the media and lawmakers have made much ado about it, would have no real legal significance, especially because the Justice Department is already well along in its investigation.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/04/10/doj-justice-department-investigation-jan-6-donald-trump-prosecution/
Galraedia
(5,337 posts)That's the only reason why Trump hasn't been charged. Trump is always going to call whatever you charge him with a partisan political witch hunt regardless of how much evidence the justice department has against him or how long they take to investigate. Choosing to delay or to not pursue justice when there is so much evidence against him is absurd and a complete failure of the DOJ as it shows that you won't be held accountable as long as you're wealthy and hold political power.
mcar
(46,538 posts)Stuart G
(38,726 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 10, 2022, 05:36 PM - Edit history (1)
or...Is Biden willing to give Garland permission to go after Donald Trump?
If the evidence is there, beyond the political implications and fall back, are the two willing to do what I believe must be done?
That is this one idea:................"No one is above the law, NO ONE!!!"........
That's it, and that is all. .................. "Garland knows, and Biden knows, Glenn Kirshner knows and the rest of us know."...
Therefore, time is ticking away on Donald Trump...........and
...I do believe Joe Biden, is a quality person, will in time, do the correct thing, and Garland will too
.Deep in my heart, I believe the direct above sentence in bold letters....It is what I believe and feel.
.............Now, I do not know when an indictment will come against Trump, but if the above single sentence about Joe being a"quality person".........is correct........then it is..............".NOT IF, BUT WHEN.?.".
Novara
(6,115 posts)I am a pure cynic and look at things like Adam Schiff alarmed that he sees no action and it looks to me, that if there was ever someone in the know it would be Adam Schiff, and that means nothing is happening.
But even I admit that we just don't know.
However, I am not so naive that I automatically assume there are all sorts of machinations going on behind the scenes that means the orange aasshole will end up in an orange jumpsuit.
Joinfortmill
(21,913 posts)I believe him.
Stuart G
(38,726 posts)UGADawg
(501 posts)If you shoot at Trump and just one on the jury is a Maggot then he will go free and be a martyr.
gab13by13
(33,062 posts)The Michigan case was lost because of entrapment by an FBI informant.
rampartc
(5,835 posts)disbands the select committee, and begins the impeachments.
the clock is ticking.
"a storm is coming" q anon
PSPS
(15,415 posts)Omaha Steve
(110,591 posts)This story is a feature analysis.
Statement of Purpose
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.