Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,839 posts)
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 01:42 PM Jun 2022

Real estate firm must comply with New York AG's Trump probe, court rules

Source: Reuters

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Real estate company Cushman & Wakefield PLC must comply with subpoenas from New York state Attorney General Letitia James as part of her civil investigation into former U.S. President Donald Trump, an appeals court ruled on Thursday.

James' probe is examining whether Trump and his family company, the Trump Organization, misled banks and tax authorities about the value of its assets to get financial benefits like favorable loans and tax breaks.

In April, James won a court order to force Cushman to comply with subpoenas for records that would help determine whether appraisals it conducted for several Trump properties, such as the Seven Springs estate in New York's Westchester county and 40 Wall Street in Manhattan, were fraudulent or misleading.

Cushman appealed the ruling, calling James' probe "overly intrusive." The Appellate Division of New York state's main trial court on Thursday denied Cushman's appeal, and ended a temporary stay on the enforcement of the subpoena.

Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/real-estate-firm-must-comply-163119927.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Real estate firm must comply with New York AG's Trump probe, court rules (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2022 OP
I doubt Cushman & Wakefield would have fought this unless they had something to hide ZonkerHarris Jun 2022 #1
Have to wonder. LiberalFighter Jun 2022 #2
If you didn't do crooked assessments then you would say "Here's the stuff you wanted." ZonkerHarris Jun 2022 #3
I doubt it's an issue of being incompetent rather I am willing to bet cstanleytech Jun 2022 #4
That's the argument melm00se Jun 2022 #6
"Overly intrusive" the nature of an investigation Karadeniz Jun 2022 #5
Could open up a can of worms Better Days Ahoy Jun 2022 #7

ZonkerHarris

(24,216 posts)
3. If you didn't do crooked assessments then you would say "Here's the stuff you wanted."
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 01:49 PM
Jun 2022

On the other hand, they could be afraid of being made to look like incompetent fools for having been conned by Trumps

cstanleytech

(26,273 posts)
4. I doubt it's an issue of being incompetent rather I am willing to bet
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 02:06 PM
Jun 2022

that it’s more along the lines of knowingly aiding and abetting it.

melm00se

(4,988 posts)
6. That's the argument
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 04:16 PM
Jun 2022

that says "If you have nothing to hide, you will let me search your house/car/bag".

It is up the state to show probable cause not for the private entity to open up the doors just because they asked.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Real estate firm must com...