Court kills Flint water charges against ex-governor, others
Source: Associated Press
DETROIT (AP) Charges against former Gov. Rick Snyder and others in the Flint water scandal must be dismissed after the Michigan Supreme Court said Tuesday that a judge had no power to issue indictments under a century-old, rarely used law.
Its an astonishing defeat for Attorney General Dana Nessel, who took office in 2019, got rid of a special prosecutor and put together a new team to investigate whether crimes were committed when lead contaminated Flints water system in 2014-15.
State laws authorize a judge to investigate, subpoena witnesses, and issue arrest warrants as a one-person grand jury, the Supreme Court said.
But they do not authorize the judge to issue indictments, the court said in a 6-0 opinion written by Chief Justice Bridget McCormack.
-snip-
By ED WHITE
12 minutes ago
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/health-crime-michigan-indictments-rick-snyder-609f461af3bb2d7f10a40c5d663620eb
Source: Detroit Free Press
Michigan Supreme Court: Judge erred in Flint water crisis indictments, one-man grand jury
Arpan Lobo
Detroit Free Press
Published 10:42 a.m. ET June 28, 2022 | Updated 12:44 p.m. ET June 28, 2022
The Michigan Supreme Court sided with a trio of former state officials charged for their involvement in the Flint drinking water crisis, issuing an opinion Tuesday that a lower court judge erred in using a "one-man grand jury" to issue indictments against the officials last year.
The unanimous opinion, with one justice not participating, calls for the cases against former state officials Nick Lyon, Nancy Peeler and Richard Baird to return to the Genesee Circuit Court for preliminary examinations.
In 2021, Genesee County Circuit Judge David Newblatt charged the group, and six others including former Gov. Rick Snyder for their involvement in the Flint water crisis, without a preliminary examination, which allows for cross-examination of witnesses before trial. Appeals to Newblatt's decision were rejected, bringing arguments to the Michigan Supreme Court.
In May, attorneys for Lyon, Peeler and Baird argued in front of the Michigan Supreme Court that they were entitled to preliminary exams. At the time, justices appeared receptive to the argument expressing skepticism over defendants getting due process in their trial.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/flint-water-crisis/2022/06/28/flint-water-crisis-michigan-supreme-court-preliminary-exams/7754550001/
yaesu
(9,377 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)The issue was what the law actually authorized not that it was "century-old, rarely used".
yaesu
(9,377 posts)rarely used law. I rest my case.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)was a century old and rarely used had nothing to do with the decision. The line:
misleadingly implies the age of the law had something to do with the decision but it was the law itself if you read further.
But they do not authorize the judge to issue indictments, the court said in a 6-0 opinion written by Chief Justice Bridget McCormack.
Laws don't expire on their own absent specific clauses to do so.
Dr. Strange
(26,058 posts)bucolic_frolic
(55,437 posts)old guy
(3,299 posts)Thomas Hurt
(13,987 posts)sakabatou
(46,202 posts)Or is Flint screwed?
James48
(5,244 posts)Another person I knew was a victim of the crime, but that has been lost to history.
My high school sweetheart (40 years ago) worked as a security guard at the Flint MCLaren hospital hit by Legionairs disease during the water crisis.
She came down with Legionaries , and died, about six months before the first official case of Legionaries disease was diagnosed. SHE wasnt officially a Legionaries case, because they werent testing for that at the time. But she is dead, and left behind like six kids.
orangecrush
(30,668 posts)Liberty and justice for all who can afford it.