Democrats Favored to Win Senate for First Time as Polling Improves: 538
Source: Newsweek
For the first time, political polling website FiveThirtyEight shows the Democrats with an edge in the race for the U.S. Senate in November.
The website late on Tuesday showed the Democrats were due to win 51 out of 100 seats, while the Republicans are slated to win 49.
There had been consensus for a long time that the Republicans will win back the Senate this fall, buoyed by high inflation and economic downturn under Democrat Joe Biden's presidency.
...
The website's Senate forecast has changed since it began polling in early June. Back then, the Democrats were only predicted to win 40 seats, with the Republicans winning a comfortable majority of 60. Since then, the Democrats have grown in popularity and now for the first time have overtaken the Republicans, and are on course to keep the Senate.
Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-favored-win-senate-first-time-538-1728325?piano_t=1
Marthe48
(23,175 posts)tell mccconnell to shove his fillibuster up his can.
wryter2000
(47,940 posts)But we sure could get 52 and end the filibuster for human rights issues, such as reproductive rights, voting rights, and civil rights including marriage equality.
Marthe48
(23,175 posts)and I want forward progress on all the things mcconnell keeps blocking. Plus, any of the traitor senators ejected from office and people who will defend the Constitution of the U.S.A. elected to fill their seats.
I don't want much, do I?
jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)It's only in these times when we all live beneath the shadow of perpetual and all-pervasive propaganda that reasonability is deemed outrageous and radically extreme.
Marthe48
(23,175 posts)I feel validated right now. Thank you.
OMGWTF
(5,131 posts)AllyCat
(18,842 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 27, 2022, 06:57 PM - Edit history (1)
Manchin and Sinema and their shenanigans that work against what Americans say they want.
know what it is with those two. Maybe they are getting paid off to do all the stuff that seems counter to where the Democrats want to go to make substantive changes that will benefit our country. I would say most of the Democrats try to do good with their lives but unfortunately there are always a few out there that are just like the worst car salesman you can imagine. Ya know crooks liars and cheats just like the orange Nazi. Or maybe its just ego where they want everybody to kiss their ass and they still wont do the right thing.
Either way if we dont get two additional seats in the Senate were fucked as far as getting anything done.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Marthe48
(23,175 posts)and any tossup. As hard as possible
Races, and Dem candidates:
Kansas (Mark Holland)
KY (Charlie Booker)
LA (Gary Chambers)
Missouri (Lucas Kunce)
North Dakota (Katrina Christiansen)
Ohio (Tim Ryan)
Oklahoma (Kendra Horn)
Penn: (John Fetterman)
Utah: (Evan McMullin) Ind.
Wisconsin: Mandala Barnes
I had to do some homework, and this is a rough list. I included some campaigns where incumbants who are probably invloved with the attempted overthrow of our country have the gall to run for reelection. Not sure I'd vote for a candidate who might be spending time in jail. It Dems GOTV, in spite of the barriers and outright stoppers, we could win many of these seats. Candidates need to talk about abortion bans, taxing the rich, expanding the s.c. moving economic legislation FORWARD. Aside from being crooks, the r's are not leaders, just slugs holding a place for future slugs, to keep obstructing anything that moves the U.S. back to leadership in the world.
Thank you for asking.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)McMullen in Utah isn't a safe bet for any Democratic legislation
Missouri will only be a stretch if Greitens is nominated.
Marthe48
(23,175 posts)if the r's keep overreaching on limiting personal freedom, anything could be possible.
The frogs might jump out of the heating water :/
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)I do hard, emotionless data analysis to determine what's actually competitive and what is not.
Marthe48
(23,175 posts)and many others on DU, probably in your life as well. Thank you!
wryter2000
(47,940 posts)Did anyone ever think the Rs could win 60 seats? Ive been thinking wed pick up seats forever. Look at the morons theyre running.
JudyM
(29,785 posts)Theyre liars and frauds, as well as some morons, but their lying, moronic messaging style and infrastructure excels, sadly enough.
wryter2000
(47,940 posts)There simply aren't 10 Dem Senators who are at any serious risk. People may be mad at Biden or Dems in general, but that doesn't mean they hate their incumbent Senator. If you look at the list of Dem Senators running, I don't see how you could pick 10 who would lose.
JudyM
(29,785 posts)We could probably pick up more seats if we upped our messaging game it has to cut through their BS.
DemocracyWins202
(34 posts)JustAnotherGen
(38,054 posts)We need to neuter/neutralize Manchin and Sinema.
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)geardaddy
(25,392 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(23,227 posts)They gave Trump a 1 in 3 chance of winning the weekend before the election.
Everybody else had 90+% chance of HRC winning.
ColinC
(11,098 posts)and the projected outcome is a 50/50 Senate with Dems losing GA and picking up PA.
Wednesdays
(22,597 posts)If Walker is to win the senate seat, he's got a huge hill to climb. He's polling at 39%.
ColinC
(11,098 posts)Warnock had a perfect storm last election that got him in. As an incumbent democrat in Georgia, his chances are only slightly better than they were last time
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)Just not possible. Only 1/3 of the seats are up for election each time. It would normally be 34 seats for 2022 not including special elections. Otherwise, there would be 33 seats up for election.
whopis01
(3,919 posts)The fivethirtyeight page showed a 40% chance of the Democrats winning and a 60% chance of the Republicans winning back on June 9th.
The article now correctly states that instead of saying it was 40 seats and 60 seats. My guess is that they corrected it after the OP grabbed the quote from the article.
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)whopis01
(3,919 posts)MichMan
(17,150 posts)Ace Rothstein
(3,373 posts)wryter2000
(47,940 posts)Doesn't trust 538.
Old Crank
(7,073 posts)Get our asses out and vote. Get people we know out to the polls.
Help people who can't get to the polls ballots and then turned in.
whopis01
(3,919 posts)Assuming that you copied that last paragraph direct from the article, it looks like they have corrected the article now.
It now correctly reads:
"the Democrats were only predicted to have a 40 percent chance to keeping the Senate, with the Republicans 60 percent chance of taking it."
instead of
"the Democrats were only predicted to win 40 seats, with the Republicans winning a comfortable majority of 60."
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)ColinC
(11,098 posts)The title of the article and article itself are wrong and misleading. Dems are not even favored to win the Senate. There is slightly more than a 50% chance they will hold at least 50 seats. The projection is they gain PA and lose GA right now (both with barely a 51% chance of the projected outcome)
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)If we want anything accomplished over the next two years, we need at least two more senators AND retain the house.
Going to Canada
(169 posts)8 new seats! Does anyone have a list at the tip of their fingers? I will look for the information.
Fiendish Thingy
(23,227 posts)WI, OH, PA, and maybe FL, but thats a long shot.
And we have close races to keep seats in NV, NH, AZ and GA.
ananda
(35,141 posts)!!!
Fiendish Thingy
(23,227 posts)Indykatie
(3,868 posts)That projection was batsh*t crazy even with the economy, gas and inflation issues. I think Dems at a minimum will hold all their current Senate seats and flip PA and OH. Fetterman and Ryan are perfect candidates for their states. Vance and Oz have helped by being sh*tty candidates and running awful campaigns.
RussBLib
(10,635 posts)I think the J6 Committee is having an effect, and I love the way the J6 people are continuing to release a stream of new info during their "quiet" period until the next hearings in September. Keep it in the news. Drip, drip. Who needs another hearing?
The GOP are EXTREMISTS! is a good, winning message. Still plenty of time to expose these fascists.
Yavin4
(37,182 posts)They are meant to drive up fundraising. That's all. You can make a poll have any result that you want. The problem with them is that it's impossible to model turnout on election day. So, there will always be a bit of a disconnect between a poll and election day results.