Pelosi lands in Taiwan, defying Chinese warnings of forceful response
Source: Washington Post
AIPEI, Taiwan House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) arrived in Taiwan late Tuesday, defying Chinese warnings against visiting the self-ruled island that Beijing claims as its territory and setting the stage for a sharp escalation in tensions between China and the United States.
Pelosi touched down at Taipeis Songshan airport at 10:44 p.m. local time.
Pelosis visit has enraged China, which for years has sought to diplomatically isolate Taiwan and views such exchanges with high-level foreign dignitaries as support for the islands formal independence. The Chinese Communist Party claims Taiwan, a self-governing democracy home to 23 million people, as its territory despite never having ruled it. Chinese leader Xi Jinping has pledged to reunify Taiwan with China by force if necessary.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/08/02/nancy-pelosi-visit-taiwan-china-military/
mopinko
(73,726 posts)catsudon
(904 posts)Last edited Tue Aug 2, 2022, 11:58 AM - Edit history (1)
Imagine visiting an independent island as a politician/diplomat. Completely unacceptable!!?!?
MerryHolidays
(7,715 posts)As the article indicates, Newt Gingrich visited Taiwan in 1997 when he was Speaker.
Seriously, Republicans can go visit Putin. Putin can visit Xi. But Speaker Pelosi can't go to Taipei? Right.
Efilroft Sul
(4,413 posts)TheFarseer
(9,770 posts)They wouldnt like it and if someone else were the opposition leader theyd be all pissed off about them. And if they had been the opposition leader for a million years like Pelosi, they would be just as fired up about that person.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,847 posts)MerryHolidays
(7,715 posts)That is why it is imperative that the US supported Ukraine. Otherwise, Putin would continue to invade other countries.
I think Speaker Pelosi's trip is clearly designed to show China not to even think about it. There is probably a huge amount of "diplomacy" going on behind the scenes as part of all this.
Haggard Celine
(17,821 posts)I've been afraid that China would invade Taiwan while Russia was in Ukraine, which would spread our resources very thin. It wouldn't surprise me if Putin and Xi got together and tried to knock the U.S. down. People talk a lot about what Europeans and Americans have done in the world, and there have been some atrocities, but today Europe and the Anglophone nations are keeping us from having a totalitarian hellhole world.
housecat
(3,138 posts)SouthernDem4ever
(6,619 posts)All those others you quoted definitely fit that bill.
Violet_Crumble
(36,385 posts)China has changed and pushes the boundaries more and more, expecting weakness and capitulation from those it challenges. They've taken over Hong Kong, have staged dangerous interceptions of Australian and Canadian warships in international waters, have challenged Japanese sovereignty over some of their outlying islands, and generelly been dicks and bullies. They sense the waning of US power and the rising of their own, which explains their recent very blatant moves to dominate the Pacific.
I just read an opinion piece in the NY Times that praised Pelosi for her stance on China and suggested that a Congress-critter visit Taiwan every week till it gets to the point that China forgets to complain about it. The same article suggested that the US also spend more money on their Navy, so that they overtake China have naval dominance. Not so keen on that suggestion as I think the US should first spend money on lifting so many of its people out of abject poverty, and after that's done then go crazy on asserting military dominance over China.
Republicans are visiting Putin? I didn't know about that. Whoever they are, words can't describe how sick those people are...
MarineCombatEngineer
(18,060 posts)Never let a bully dictate what you can and cannot do, it only makes it worse the next time.
twodogsbarking
(18,779 posts)Odds seem even.
MarineCombatEngineer
(18,060 posts)yeah, never tell Speaker Pelosi where she can or cannot go, she'll rip you a new one.
Polybius
(21,900 posts)Even he got ripped one.
LymphocyteLover
(9,847 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(18,060 posts)he didn't seem to push the issue too hard.
MerryHolidays
(7,715 posts)It's the Speaker of the House going, NOT the President. I think they (President and Speaker) are extremely sensitive to what's going on. However, China has NO right to tell Nancy Pelosi where she can/cannot go.
niyad
(132,440 posts)BradAllison
(1,879 posts)Weird....
Pete Ross Junior
(404 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(179,847 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(18,060 posts)Giving China the middle finger, that's our Speaker Pelosi.

catsudon
(904 posts)no text
Marthe48
(23,175 posts)It isn't our states' business either. Hoping the despots in our country notice the similarities between China trying to bar travel by our own Madame Speaker to Taiwan, and the fascists trying to impede interstate travel in our own county.
Baggies
(666 posts)It wont necessarily be a military action, but theyll do something.
EYESORE 9001
(29,732 posts)then I hope China proceeds with actions which hasten that eventuality. China can go suck eggs.
catsudon
(904 posts)but they don't have the balls to ban TSMC chips.
iluvtennis
(21,497 posts)highplainsdem
(62,137 posts)Turbineguy
(40,074 posts)that way they can blame democrats.
Billions will die, but that's OK.
EX500rider
(12,583 posts)They have more to lose then us, our Navy has the reach to keep the war over there and our subs have the ability to shut down China's seaborne exports & imports, killing their economy. They'd have a tiger by the tail and it wouldn't end well for them, probably in a regime change by popular uprising.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,847 posts)SoFloDenny
(58 posts)867-5309.
(1,189 posts)And now that she's done it, it's great, apparently.
Still dangerous.
Polybius
(21,900 posts)I was once again in the minority, supporting her trip from the start.
herding cats
(20,049 posts)I'm proud of Pelosi.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(135,704 posts)I don't remember any such poll.
herding cats
(20,049 posts)I hadn't seen it either so I searched and dug it up.
88 votes 35 yes, 53 no.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216979320
MarineCombatEngineer
(18,060 posts)Madam Speaker Pelosi cannot let the Chinese Govt. dictate where she can and cannot visit.
It's only logical.
William769
(59,147 posts)JI7
(93,615 posts)not becsuse they thought she was wrong politically.
Torchlight
(6,829 posts)Good luck.
pandr32
(14,272 posts)Her high-heeled footprint will be a hard one for any successor to fill.
LymphocyteLover
(9,847 posts)jalan48
(14,914 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(18,060 posts)however, unofficially, we don't, we send the Taiwanese military weapons, equipment, training, we routinely transit the Taiwan Straits with US warships, along with allied warships, all under the protestations of China.
jalan48
(14,914 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(18,060 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,747 posts)Fact Sheet
Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs
May 28, 2022
U.S.-Taiwan Relationship
As a leading democracy and a technological powerhouse, Taiwan is a key U.S. partner in the Indo-Pacific. Though the United States does not have diplomatic relations with Taiwan, we have a robust unofficial relationship. The United States and Taiwan share similar values, deep commercial and economic links, and strong people-to-people ties, which form the bedrock of our friendship and serve as the impetus for expanding U.S. engagement with Taiwan.
Through the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT), a non-governmental organization mandated by the Taiwan Relations Act to carry out the United States unofficial relations with Taiwan, our cooperation with Taiwan continues to expand. Taiwan has become an important U.S. partner in trade and investment, health, semiconductor and other critical supply chains, investment screening, science and technology, education, and advancing democratic values.
The United States approach to Taiwan has remained consistent across decades and administrations. The United States has a longstanding one China policy, which is guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, the three U.S.-China Joint Communiques, and the Six Assurances. We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-Strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means. We continue to have an abiding interest in peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. Consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act, the United States makes available defense articles and services as necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability - and maintains our capacity to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of Taiwan.
(snip)
The variation from "One China" is spelled out in H.R.2479 - Taiwan Relations Act -
(Conference report filed in House, H. Rept. 96-71)
Taiwan Relations Act - Declares it to be the policy of the United States to preserve and promote extensive, close, and friendly commercial, cultural, and other relations between the people of the United States and the people on Taiwan, as well as the people on the China mainland and all other people of the Western Pacific area. Declares that peace and stability in the area are in the political, security, and economic interests of the United States, and are matters of international concern. States that the United States decision to establish diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China rests upon the expectation that the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful means and that any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes is considered a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of grave concern to the United States. States that the United States shall provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character and shall maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or social or economic system, of the people of Taiwan.
Reaffirms as a commitment of the United States the preservation of human rights of the people of Taiwan.
Declares that in furtherance of the principle of maintaining peace and stability in the Western Pacific area, the United States shall make available to Taiwan such defense articles and defense services in such quantity as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capacity as determined by the President and the Congress. Requires such determination of Taiwan's defense needs to be reviewed by United States military authorities in connection with recommendations to the President and the Congress.
(snip)
More: https://www.congress.gov/bill/96th-congress/house-bill/2479
jalan48
(14,914 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,747 posts)(it seems the U.S. recognized the concept of "the 'Republic of China'" but not really for Taiwan. A similar issue exists with Hong Kong, although the previous administration ditched special exemptions due to China's National Security Law there and the Biden administration had issued a "business advisory" last year for U.S companies operating there. The policy regarding Hong has recently been updated - https://www.state.gov/2022-hong-kong-policy-act-report/
MarineCombatEngineer
(18,060 posts)it keeps the Chinese guessing what the US will do if they decide to roll the dice on Taiwan, just like during the Cold War with the Soviet Union, it drove the Soviet leaders nuts trying to figure out just how far they could push the US/NATO alliance before all out war and when we would authorize the release of nuclear weapons.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,847 posts)mcar
(46,056 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)IronLionZion
(51,267 posts)Russia isn't doing so well in Ukraine. Taiwan is harder to invade.
myohmy2
(3,721 posts)...China launches a full scale invasion of Taiwan what will our response be? Give Taiwan everything they want and need?
...who's going to bankroll this fight with China? Us and Japan...?
...I applaud her not taking any bullshit from China but there will be a cost...China drew a line in the sand now it will have to respond...
...do we have the money and will for Russia and China fight?
...how do you like our current round of Ukrainian inspired inflation?...what will our domestic political costs be?
...the pukes love Nancy's trip to Taiwan but they don't vote for us...
...November is going to be very interesting...
AntiFascist
(13,751 posts)myohmy2
(3,721 posts)...and what would our fight with China over Taiwan even look like?...would it be over democracy or computer chips?...which would call into question why we currently have low capacity to produce chips and many other things we need...gasoline on domestic politics...
...and I'm not saying we're a racist nation but we do have our problems...whites still control the economics and politics in this country...
...Ukrainians are white...would we still go to bat for Taiwan with the same resolve and vigor as Ukraine?...I have my doubts...
...this is going to get messy...
EX500rider
(12,583 posts)See Korean War
Jun 25, 1950 Jul 27, 1953
The US suffered 33,686 battle deaths.
AntiFascist
(13,751 posts)Maybe the thinking is that war is necessary to unite Left and Right? I hope we learn how to treat veterans, at least.