Blinken, Lavrov come face-to-face at U.N. Security Council showdown
Source: Politico
That President [Vladimir] Putin picked this week as most of the world gathers at the United Nations to add fuel to the fire that he started shows his utter contempt for the U.N. charter, for the General Assembly and for this council, Blinken said in remarks at a U.N. Security Council meeting. The international order that we gathered here to uphold is being shredded before our eyes.
The meeting comes just one day after Putin mobilized 300,000 reservists to aid in Russias war against Ukraine and threatened to use nuclear weapons. Biden blasted Putin for the escalation, saying in a speech to the U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday that Russias attempts to erase Ukraine from the map should make your blood run cold.
The 15-member security council gathered on Thursday to discuss Russias war on Ukraine, alleged war crimes and sham referendums to be held in Ukrainian territories seized by Russia marking one of the highest-profile confrontations between Russian officials and their critics since the Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine. Lavrovs attendance came as a surprise to some officials, as he had in July walked out of a meeting of the Group of 20 foreign ministers in Indonesia following criticism over Russias war.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/22/blinken-lavrov-u-n-security-council-00058295
brooklynite
(94,359 posts)Ukraine and its allies were attempting to impose on us a completely different narrative about Russian aggression, Lavrov argued.
Lavrov was nearly 90 minutes late for the security council meeting and appeared to want to leave as soon as he finished speaking.
Britains foreign secretary, James Cleverly, speaking at the council meeting after Lavrov, said the UK would support Ukraine all the way and for as long as it takes.
BigmanPigman
(51,567 posts)I wonder what Putin and Russia are spooked about? Getting kicked out of security councils is one thing, but the world can see he is a cornered rat. China and India say, "You're on your own, dude".
former9thward
(31,941 posts)Beijing is seeking to deepen economic ties with Moscow, while New Delhi has increased its purchases of Russian crude and relies on the country for military supplies (Sept. 21 2022)
A summit in Central Asia last week served as a public stage for Moscows biggest backers to express misgivings about the Ukraine war, with Russian President Vladimir Putin acknowledging that China had concerns and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi saying, Todays era is not an era for war.
Despite those public expressions of doubt, China is staying the course in its relationship with Russia and even seeking to deepen the economic ties between the two countries, said Chinese officials familiar with Beijings thinking. For its part, although India is growing increasingly frustrated with the impact the war is having on the economy and developing world, New Delhi hasnt altered its close ties with Moscow, Indian officials said.
China and India see their close relationships with Russia as a necessity, even as Russias forces have faced some of their biggest battlefield setbacks, officials from both countries say. China sees Russia as a strategic partner in its escalating rivalry with the U.S., and India relies on Moscow for more than half of its military supplies.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-india-stand-by-russia-despite-its-setbacks-in-ukraine-war-11663774727
BigmanPigman
(51,567 posts)both MSM and other reports. I am clearly very disheartened. I should not get my hopes up based on media reports I guess.
Damn!!!!!!
Martin68
(22,768 posts)to be null and void.
brooklynite
(94,359 posts)Martin68
(22,768 posts)Security Council vote? I'm not exactly sure what you mean.
brooklynite
(94,359 posts)We're discussing legal recognition, not military action.
Martin68
(22,768 posts)As you point out, that will require a military component.
brooklynite
(94,359 posts)There won't be one.
Martin68
(22,768 posts)brooklynite
(94,359 posts)You said nothing about the resolution being legal or binding.
Many UN resolutions are symbolic and expressive of opinions. This will be one of them. The UN will NOT do something that will require military action, just as they didnt when the war started.
Martin68
(22,768 posts)to read your tea leaves and understand your cryptic vagueness. Sorry for taking you seriously.,
brooklynite
(94,359 posts)I said they can...declare the elections illegal. And I expect they will. But the UN WON'T take action against Russia because of them.
Perhaps if you want less cryptic answers, ask clearer questions.
Bayard
(22,011 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,567 posts)Pachamama
(16,884 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,567 posts)Kid Berwyn
(14,802 posts)But for the emails.