Sex abuse allegations spread against cheerleading industry
Source: AP
By JAMES POLLARD
Sprawling allegations of abuse against cheerleaders reached Tennessee on Monday in a case that escalates the accusations facing some of the sports top institutions.
An adult coach sexually assaulted teenage boys at Premier Athletics, according to allegations in a federal lawsuit filed in Memphis that is similar to a previous complaint against Rockstar Cheer in South Carolina.
In both cases, attorneys say leaders at Varsity Spirit, which runs competitions, and the U.S. All Star Federation, the countrys cheerleading governing body, failed to provide a safe environment for athletes.
The lawsuit, brought anonymously by two teenage boys and one boys mother, alleges that a Premier Athletics coach sent nude pictures and masturbation videos and instigated nonconsensual sexual acts.
Attorney Alexandra Benevento, center, speaks with reporters during a news conference announcing a cheerleader abuse lawsuit filed in Tennessee on Tuesday, Sept. 27, 2022, in Memphis, Tenn. (AP Photo/Adrian Sainz)
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/sports-lawsuits-tennessee-cheerleading-65750931a3804bb1495a7c04aec05dc2
speak easy
(9,246 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,149 posts)Moosepoop
(1,920 posts)There is no such thing as a casting couch for a child (or any person unable to give consent).
Sexual conduct between an adult and a child is illegal, and wrong.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)But hey, a chance to make gay men look like horrible predators, so ...
What I mean is, this suit sounds kinda shady, as does AP's framing of the story.
Emphasis Mine:
So, one guy and two teens is a 'sprawling' situation? Okay AP
What exactly does that mean? Did he rape a teen, or did he text him a dick pic? Pretty wildly different scenarios in terms of actual harm.
Then there's also AP calling it a 'a federal lawsuit'. Doesn't sound like it's being brought by the Feds, correct me if I'm wrong.
I'm just saying ... I don't know about this AP story, or this suit.
I'll reserve judgment til I hear a bit more.
Moosepoop
(1,920 posts)It's very long, but lots of info in it.
It IS a federal lawsuit, filed in one of the three US District Courts in Tennessee.
It's filed on behalf of John Does 1 & 2, AND John and Jane Does 1-100. There is anticipation that other victims, male and female, will be coming forward to join the suit.
The lawsuit does reference abuse of girls, such as --
118. Defendant USASF listed the suspension as temporary.
Did the one defendant send a dick pic, or rape a teen? Both (and multiple teens), according to the lawsuit.
The AP is correct in calling the allegations "sprawling." There are a dozen defendants (individuals and corporations), and the allegations are:
That's the nutshell version, the allegations are fleshed out in the 71-page suit. I read the whole thing. I recommend it for anyone curious about the situation.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)I doubt I'll read 71 pages, so thanks for the synopsis.
Interesting, don't you think, that the AP article references nothing about the cameras in the girls room, only about a man and some boys?
Couple questions though since you've read it all ...
1) Is the person who set the camera in the girls changing area perhaps the same one who sent the dick pics to boys? Does it say? In other words, is there possibly actually just one offender?
2) Do we know if the images of girls changing were spread around, like on the internet, or worse, sold? Were the images found on one person's computer, or could it have possibly been just a really stupid surveillance policy of monitoring the changing areas by the company?
3) You said someone was raped, per this lawsuit. What did you mean by that?
When I think of 'sprawling' I think ... The Catholic Church. Many, many victims, many, many perps, literal rapes, and a clear conspiracy to protect the offenders.
From what you said above, this could still be one sex offender doing some awful things.
Understand I'm all for protecting these minors, I'm just really down on AP lately. My issue is with their reporting. Even with what you told me, I still think it's kinda shit in this case.
Moosepoop
(1,920 posts)I understand your issues with the AP, and share some of them. In this instance, though, they are reporting on a specific lawsuit, which was brought on behalf of two specific victims (plus any future ones who may join the suit). So the reporting centers primarily on the allegations made by these specific victims, plus the allegation that sexual abuse of minors in the cheer/tumbling circuit is rampant, known, allowed and covered up nationally by the corporations involved. Hence the use of the term "sprawling."
The suit references other publically known cases, involving both female and male victims.
To your questions:
1) No, that was a completely different person.
2) It was a Go-Pro camera belonging to a coach. He has been prosecuted. There were no charges of disseminating the videos he took, so I'm assuming they were for his own personal use. The point being made in the current lawsuit is that even with this coach's illegal and perverted actions, his "suspension" from coaching is only "temporary."
3) I mean raped. I'm not going to spell out the details here. They are available in the link I provided.
It is not one offender doing awful things. It's a lot of people doing awful things, with the knowledge and inside protection of a large organization, much like the Catholic Church.
IronLionZion
(45,434 posts)so that's at least 2 lawsuits in 2 states in one month.
keithbvadu2
(36,793 posts)If you want Gym Jordan to shut up, tell him some teen age boys are being molested.
Ziggysmom
(3,407 posts)necessary, but if sports decides it needs them, let's have the squads made up as 50/50 male and female cheerleaders.