Biden warns world would face 'Armageddon' if Putin uses a tactical nuclear weapon in Ukraine
Source: The Guardian
Joe Biden has warned the world could face Armageddon if Vladimir Putin uses a tactical nuclear weapon to try to win the war in Ukraine.
The US president made his most outspoken remarks to date about the threat of nuclear war, at a Democratic fundraiser in New York, saying it was the closest the world had come to nuclear catastrophe for sixty years.
We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban missile crisis, he said.
Weve got a guy I know fairly well, Biden said, referring to the Russian president. Hes not joking when he talks about potential use of tactical nuclear weapons or biological or chemical weapons because his military is, you might say, significantly underperforming.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/oct/07/biden-warns-world-would-face-armageddon-if-putin-uses-a-tactical-nuclear-weapon-in-ukraine
Yes. I think we should have a national debate about tactical nuclear weapons now, not after one has been used.
DENVERPOPS
(13,003 posts)That U.S. Military commanders have been having a serious conversation about this for the past months.......
speak easy
(12,598 posts)DENVERPOPS
(13,003 posts)I have to believe that the reason he is pulling his soldiers back AND letting the Ukraine soldiers in is that he is setting the area up for some kind of Major offense like tactical nuke strikes or Chemical Weapon strikes in that entire area................He would clear his soldiers from being wiped out, and has suckered the Ukraine soldiers into the area.
In reality, who knows what Putin is thinking, given his age and poor health............
speak easy
(12,598 posts)Those long tables during the pandemic suggest to me that he afraid of death.
EndlessWire
(8,103 posts)but, he isn't pulling his soldiers back. They are falling back out of desperation. They don't want to get encircled. They are also surrendering in record numbers. They are, by all accounts, poorly motivated, poorly equipped, poorly trained. They are better off giving up in order to live.
I can't see how Russia gains anything by making the coastline uninhabitable. But, he may choose another area to "test" his weapon. It would be a big mistake on his part. The winds may blow back on him. The key to a NATO response is, apparently, which way the wind blows.
Irish_Dem
(81,262 posts)He wants control over the countries which border Russia.
And he wants western democracies weakened and terrified of him to the point they comply.
Putin doesn't care if he has to destroy Ukraine to achieve these goals.
purr-rat beauty
(1,255 posts)All Western nations will turn every person, business, etc into a pariah. Anyone doing business with Russia will face sanctions for certain, will be kicked out of the UN.
Irish_Dem
(81,262 posts)He figures he can make enough on oil exports to make up for losses.
Delphinus
(12,522 posts)And he engenders in me the desire to wring his neck with my own two hands. I must not let that hatred take over my heart.
Irish_Dem
(81,262 posts)Justice matters.
(9,786 posts)Would be a shame if something bad like a cruise missile in the middle of Red Square happened to it.
Yeah, I think that's the reason why the war-criminal asshole didn't use these tacticals so far.
Irish_Dem
(81,262 posts)PortTack
(35,820 posts)Circumstance retreat.
As far as Ukrainian soldiers being suckered into anything, they have all the intelligence they need and arent being fooled. US intelligence will know via satellite and on the ground intelligence when or if things are in place that the russians will make nuclear strike. If anything putin wants the Ukrainians fearful and paralyzed. They know hes a mad man, but they playing his game, theyve got a war to fight.
bluestarone
(22,177 posts)A pooty nuclear TRAP! He will kill a bunch! Hope Zelensky Sees this as a possibility!
BadGimp
(4,109 posts)and has a reasonable probability of being accurate...
Rebl2
(17,740 posts)A debate/conversation that I would not want to be involved in, for sure.............
speak easy
(12,598 posts)is best equipped to conduct.
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)I want to hear that from an American President.
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)...and how?
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)sarisataka
(22,695 posts)Mental masturbation
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)DENVERPOPS
(13,003 posts)a generation or three ago, and yet we still have tens of thousands of them that have been manufactured by the U.S. and everyone else.
Putin and Assad felt free to use them a few years back on the Syrian Rebels.........
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)to negotiate in good faith, or any faith, as required by those treaties.
Xolodno
(7,349 posts)...who were willing to Nuke it out.
JFK committed "quiet appeasement", gave the Soviet Union a reason to back down...and then quietly removed the nukes in Turkey and Italy.
Aussie105
(7,920 posts)why no one will use nuclear weapons in any part of Europe.
If Putin goes for the Big Red Button, hopefully someone with some intelligence and courage will stop him.
We were wishing for something similar in the US with TFG a few years back, if I remember.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,685 posts)Proclaiming End of World doomsday scaremongering only serves Putin. We all know it would be a disaster.
What we need is specifics. Consequences concisely laid out for the shirtless barbarian.
That IF he dares drop even one nuclear bomb or missile:
NATO would immediately jump into action.
His naval fleet caught in the Black Sea would be wiped out.
Jet fighters from multiple countries would swoop in and enforce a no fly zone, and destroy all the rest of the military bases, tanks, planes that Russia is using. The Russian troops will have a deadline with which to leave Ukraine's territories, or be under fire from both Ukraine and NATO forces.
And then increased sanctions, and squeezing Russia until there is a regime change in Russia and Putin resigns.
And all of this should be read aloud at the UN or NATO headquarters so that Putin, and the whole world hears it loud and clear, so no one can complain about what happens next.
PortTack
(35,820 posts)He no doubt doesnt like it, and is paying attention.
Another issue that is not being discussed is Putin wont negotiate with Ukraine, but rather sees Ukraine as the hostage. A hostage cannot give him what he wants, and what he wants is a seat back at the table with the US. Hes always maintained that he wants Russia to be on an equal footing with the US. Being the kgb bully he is he thinks this is the way to go about it. Hes counting on the resolve of the EU and all of NATO, other countries, Japan, Australia, NewZeland and others to weaken over the coming months giving him the negotiating edge he wants. The EU especially cannot give in ..they know they will be next.
Many military experts and ppl that say they know whats going on inside russia think that he will not be able to convince his military to go along with that decision.
Pray to the gods cooler heads will prevail
honest.abe
(9,238 posts)The specifics have already been provided to Putin directly.
https://www.businessinsider.com/white-house-privately-warned-russia-against-using-nuclear-weapons-report-2022-9
Also, there have been warnings made by national security adviser, Jake Sullivan.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/25/us/politics/us-russia-nuclear.html
I think the purpose of Biden's comments at the fundraiser was more about getting Putin to consider negotiating and finding his "off ramp". Seems it was more a personal message to Putin to lets figure this out so we dont get to Armageddon.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,685 posts)"so we don't get to Amageddon"
That is what Putin wants to hear. Even that the West is using that word must make him smile.
And that we are only whispering to him privately not to use nuclear weapons or else? Not gonna work.
I'm also thinking of how Putin will spin it AFTER he uses a nuke. He will go on State TV and state that the US and the West better NOT retaliate. And any action by the West will be twisted and used by Putin to declare that the west is unilaterally declaring war on Russia with no warning or basis to do so.
No, we have to make it very clear, publicly to the whole world, not "private warnings". So they and the whole world know that Russia has heard it, and has no excuses or reasons to whine afterwards when the consequences come.
JohnnyRingo
(20,870 posts)And Putin and Un know it. They have to know it would be the war crime of the century.
newdayneeded
(2,493 posts)donny would've been at the podium wearing a putin cheerleader outfit complete with pom-poms.
Give me a "P", give me a "U,......
myohmy2
(3,721 posts)...this day was coming ever since trump wrapped his arms around putin...
...trump partnered and accepted help from putin to defeat Hillary then gave putin space and comfort...
...instead of wrapping his arms around putin trump should had been isolating and condemning him...
...but both are fascists and we now know why trump didn't believe our intelligent agencies...
...there's only one solution, putin must go and soon...
...it doesn't matter how but if the world wants to remain intact it had better figure out a way to eliminate him...
"Hes not joking when he talks about potential use of tactical nuclear weapons..."
...we shouldn't be joking about eliminating putin from the world stage...
...billions may parish because of this one man?
...unacceptable...
sarisataka
(22,695 posts)That starts rolling down the mountain...
Tom Rinaldo
(23,187 posts)Practically, they represent the last bulwark of deterrence. Each side is forced to consider the likelihood that their aggressive pursuit of military objectives might trigger off consequences they would rather not face. The more dire the threats, the more dire the potential consequences.
In the realm of threats, the U.S. can not "unilaterally disarm." For us to concede in advance that we would act with restraint should Russia introduce the use of tactical nuclear weapons into its war on Ukraine increases the likelihood that Russia will introduce the use of tactical nuclear weapons into its war on Ukraine.
I count on the Biden Administration to make sober calculations in private about what type of military response should be initiated if Russia uses tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine. I also count on the Biden Administration to not give Russia reason in advance to believe that their use of tactical nuclear weapons would be a positive game changer for their side.
I thank God that Joe Biden is our President.
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)in many militaries hard!
The Citizens in their Homelands must be in terror atm.
2naSalit
(102,789 posts)Population might be in order. Like maybe China and India should take over Russia and relieve some of the overpopulation stresses that will continue to do damage to the biosphere. Those populations have better technology and creative ingenuity than the Russians, they have been so controlled for so long that all they can do it get blasted so they can endure their fate. Maybe they need a shot in the butt... of culture and technology that will help them live better and survive longer.
A global commission could direct the transition, it could be a good thing, we might be able to get rid of all the nukes...
https://worldpopulationreview.com/

(waiting for Eyore)
Response to speak easy (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(135,697 posts)I say we don't negotiate with terrorists.