Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:03 PM Nov 2012

Open to compromise in talks on fiscal cliff:

Source: wtaq.com

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama on Friday invited congressional leaders to the White House to start negotiating a deal to prevent sharp tax hikes and spending cuts from going into effect at the end of the year and said he was "open to compromise."

"I'm open to new ideas," he said in his first White House appearance since defeating Republican Mitt Romney in Tuesday's election. "I'm committed to solving our fiscal challenges, but I refuse to accept any approach that isn't balanced." He again pushed for higher taxes for wealthier Americans.

If Congress and the administration don't act, the abrupt fiscal tightening would tip the weak economy into recession, analysts have said. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said this week unemployment could rise above 9 percent year if nothing is done to avert the so-called fiscal cliff.



Read more: http://wtaq.com/news/articles/2012/nov/09/obama-says-open-to-compromise-in-talks-on-fiscal-cliff/



I've always found that announcing a desire to compromise is NOT the way to get a good deal. Let's see how this goes.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Open to compromise in talks on fiscal cliff: (Original Post) Junkdrawer Nov 2012 OP
"Announcing a desire" is not the same as "open" BeyondGeography Nov 2012 #1
Or he could have just announced his plan.... Junkdrawer Nov 2012 #3
Or he could just be more like this guy BeyondGeography Nov 2012 #5
Well, it's not even been three days, and mac56 Nov 2012 #6
4 years and 3 days. n/t godai Nov 2012 #7
You knew it was coming ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #11
Bingo! Nt peace13 Nov 2012 #12
He would be walking into a trap mac56 Nov 2012 #2
He isn't compromising what he campaigned on Ztolkins Nov 2012 #4
Actually this is a very shrewd move on Obama's part Major Nikon Nov 2012 #8
Spam deleted by gkhouston (MIR Team) Dubster Nov 2012 #9
Hmmmm robbob Nov 2012 #13
Give Obama some room rablrouzer Nov 2012 #10
Sorry but shared sacrifice between millionaires and poverty-line grandmas sucks ass. limpyhobbler Nov 2012 #14

BeyondGeography

(39,377 posts)
1. "Announcing a desire" is not the same as "open"
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:08 PM
Nov 2012

Imagine he ends election week by saying he's "not open to compromise." How dumb would that be?

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
3. Or he could have just announced his plan....
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:11 PM
Nov 2012

Announcing you're open to compromise is announcing you don't take your own plan seriously.

mac56

(17,574 posts)
2. He would be walking into a trap
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:10 PM
Nov 2012

if he announced that he was categorically opposed to compromise.

Yes, indeed, let's see how this goes.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
8. Actually this is a very shrewd move on Obama's part
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:17 PM
Nov 2012

Announcing a desire to compromise is not necessarily a sign of weakness.

Obama has an ace up his sleeve that will trump any card the GOP could ever hope to play. If no compromise is reached, $55 million comes right out of the military industrial complex. Poof! It's gone. This is no small deal. It cuts right to the heart and soul of what fuels the GOP. While I never underestimate the stupidity of the GOP and their willingness to slit the throat of the American worker, I'm just not so sure they would be just as willing to slit their own throat in the process.

robbob

(3,536 posts)
13. Hmmmm
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:59 PM
Nov 2012

I believe it when I see it. Everything I have heard Bonehead say indicates he want to close tax breaks and loopholes, some of which will affect hard working middle class Americans, but is not going to budge on raising taxes on the wealthiest 1% of the population.

rablrouzer

(66 posts)
10. Give Obama some room
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 03:38 PM
Nov 2012

Even before the 2008 ballots were dry, I began hearing that Obama was a disappointment.

Let's not go there again.

The President accomplished much. Isn't that why America voted for him?

I am perfectly happy to see the Bush tax cuts expire, even if it means my own taxes go up.

Not so happy about the "sequester," which would cut tens of billions from the very small part of the federal budget that is discretionary (not "wars," not Social Security and Medicare.)

Can't imagine the House Repubs want to be "blamed" for taxes on the great majority of Americans going up, while benefits for those Americans are whacked.

The only trick is to make sure the public understands it really is the Republicans who caused it.

Votes in 2012 make pretty clear that the public already does.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
14. Sorry but shared sacrifice between millionaires and poverty-line grandmas sucks ass.
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 11:52 PM
Nov 2012

There are other ways to get money besides taking it out of vital social services.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Open to compromise in tal...