Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
Tue Dec 6, 2022, 12:13 AM Dec 2022

Trump's committee paying for lawyers of key Mar a Lago witnesses

Source: WA Post

Former president Donald Trump’s political action committee is paying legal bills for some key witnesses involved in the Justice Department investigation into whether Trump mishandled classified documents, obstructed the investigation or destroyed government records, according to people familiar with the matter.

The witnesses include Kash Patel, who has testified in front of the grand jury and is key to Trump’s defense, along with Walt Nauta, a potentially critical prosecution witness, according to these people, who like others interviewed spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing criminal probe. Nauta, a Trump valet, has told FBI agents he was instructed by the former president to move boxes at Mar-a-Lago, even as government investigators were trying to recover classified documents at that private club and residence, according to people familiar with the matter.

Both Patel and Nauta are represented by Brand Woodward Law, which according to public records has been paid more than $120,000 by Trump’s Save America PAC. Stan Brand, the top lawyer at the firm, said there is nothing improper about the PAC paying legal bills for witnesses in the investigation. Another lawyer not involved in the case, however, said it could encourage witnesses to not cooperate.

“There’s no bar against third parties paying for legal fees as long as it’s disclosed to the client. The ethical obligation of the lawyer is to the client,” Brand said. “This is a tempest in a teapot and another cheap shot at these people because of who they work for.”

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/12/05/trump-witnesses-legal-bills-pac/

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

DENVERPOPS

(8,802 posts)
2. All of Trump's entire life
Tue Dec 6, 2022, 01:31 AM
Dec 2022

he has thrown money at any problem that he has encountered, this is no different......

Botany

(70,479 posts)
3. Both Patel and Nauta are represented by Brand Woodward who has has been paid more than $120,000 ...
Tue Dec 6, 2022, 02:06 AM
Dec 2022

... by Trump’s Save America PAC.

By this time the people still giving to Trump must know they are being fleeced by a con man.

GB_RN

(2,346 posts)
7. Don't Know About That...
Tue Dec 6, 2022, 10:09 AM
Dec 2022

But it certainly seems to cross some ethical boundaries for the lawyers & firm. Since it & they represent tRump & his PAC, it/they cannot give these “witnesses” advice in their own best interest if it conflicts with that if tRump’s: They aren’t the actual clients, tRump is. That’s why tRump is doing this: The law firm will look out for him before their witness “clients”.

bucolic_frolic

(43,115 posts)
6. Corruption to an exponential power, one perp paying another's legal bills nearly a bribe?
Tue Dec 6, 2022, 07:39 AM
Dec 2022

"We're all in this together!"

"I've got your back! Have you got mine?"

"Just swear on the Bible, they'll believe anything."

PAC's are a legal slush fund?

9. Is there any question about why TFG's lawyers want the unredacted affidavit?
Tue Dec 6, 2022, 05:25 PM
Dec 2022

It's a "to-do" list of people to be threatened, blackmailed or paid off.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump's committee paying ...