Trump's committee paying for lawyers of key Mar a Lago witnesses
Source: WA Post
Former president Donald Trumps political action committee is paying legal bills for some key witnesses involved in the Justice Department investigation into whether Trump mishandled classified documents, obstructed the investigation or destroyed government records, according to people familiar with the matter.
The witnesses include Kash Patel, who has testified in front of the grand jury and is key to Trumps defense, along with Walt Nauta, a potentially critical prosecution witness, according to these people, who like others interviewed spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing criminal probe. Nauta, a Trump valet, has told FBI agents he was instructed by the former president to move boxes at Mar-a-Lago, even as government investigators were trying to recover classified documents at that private club and residence, according to people familiar with the matter.
Both Patel and Nauta are represented by Brand Woodward Law, which according to public records has been paid more than $120,000 by Trumps Save America PAC. Stan Brand, the top lawyer at the firm, said there is nothing improper about the PAC paying legal bills for witnesses in the investigation. Another lawyer not involved in the case, however, said it could encourage witnesses to not cooperate.
Theres no bar against third parties paying for legal fees as long as its disclosed to the client. The ethical obligation of the lawyer is to the client, Brand said. This is a tempest in a teapot and another cheap shot at these people because of who they work for.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/12/05/trump-witnesses-legal-bills-pac/
C_U_L8R
(44,996 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,826 posts)DENVERPOPS
(8,802 posts)he has thrown money at any problem that he has encountered, this is no different......
Botany
(70,479 posts)... by Trumps Save America PAC.
By this time the people still giving to Trump must know they are being fleeced by a con man.
pfitz59
(10,344 posts)I thought PACs had limited distributions?
GB_RN
(2,346 posts)But it certainly seems to cross some ethical boundaries for the lawyers & firm. Since it & they represent tRump & his PAC, it/they cannot give these witnesses advice in their own best interest if it conflicts with that if tRumps: They arent the actual clients, tRump is. Thats why tRump is doing this: The law firm will look out for him before their witness clients.
Ford_Prefect
(7,875 posts)Trump meddling in the legal processes once again.
bucolic_frolic
(43,115 posts)"We're all in this together!"
"I've got your back! Have you got mine?"
"Just swear on the Bible, they'll believe anything."
PAC's are a legal slush fund?
BWdem4life
(1,658 posts)You gotta save the guy who's gonna save America!
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,577 posts)It's a "to-do" list of people to be threatened, blackmailed or paid off.