Rupert Murdoch will be deposed in Dominion's $1.6 billion lawsuit against Fox
Source: CNBC
Fox Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch is scheduled to appear for a deposition next week as part of Dominion Votings defamation lawsuit against the company and its cable TV networks. Murdoch will appear via video call on Dec. 13 and 14, according to a court filing. His deposition will follow that of his son, Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch, on Monday this week.
In its $1.6 billion lawsuit against Fox, Dominion has argued that Fox News and Fox Business made false claims that its voting machines were rigged in the 2020 presidential election between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Representatives for Fox and Dominion did not comment beyond the court filing. Fox has vigorously denied the claims.
The Murdochs are the highest-ranking executives to be questioned. Earlier this year Foxs TV personalities, including Maria Bartiromo, Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson and Jeanine Pirro, appeared for depositions. The depositions and documents that Dominion has been collecting through the discovery process remain private. Fox has requested that the court keep all collected materials private, claiming Dominion mischaracterized what they show as actual malice.
Dominion must prove to a jury that Fox and its TV hosts acted with actual malice ? meaning they knew they were reporting false information but continued to do so anyway, or purposely disregarded information that showed their reporting as inaccurate. Foxs top brass are being deposed after a Delaware judge overseeing the case reportedly ruled in June that Dominions lawsuit could be expanded beyond the cable TV networks to include their parent company. Dominion has argued Fox and its top executives played a role in Foxs TV personalities spreading misinformation about voter fraud.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/06/rupert-murdoch-deposed-dominion-lawsuit.html
ffr
(22,672 posts)Ah, who cares! I love it!
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)Getting these purveyors of lies and deceit is going to prove difficult though, even though half of Americans know they're guilty. Proving that Fox's on-air "celebrities" did this with malice, and knowledge that it was all lies, is going to be more difficult that most believe, in my opinion. I wouldn't put lying under oath out of their range either. They're snakes.
ancianita
(36,137 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,543 posts)that they may have to sell off.
ancianita
(36,137 posts)that it would stay intact minus bits & pieces.
The problem is the management that can still rev right back to similar "news" programming, anyway.
It's too bad that the court can't rule to eliminate and replace current Murdoch owners or management.
This is a suit that dramatizes two goliaths going at it, and we as audience love to imagine some win for their market audience, when there really isn't one. It's just that the chairs at the FOX table get rearranged -- maybe hosts changed, who knows -- but facts and truth won't be considered profitable enough to change programming or production.
speak easy
(9,324 posts)Graphic 2 - My Space - Divested June 2011
BumRushDaShow
(129,543 posts)(and the 2nd one was even from 2010) there have been some sell-offs and shifts. Was trying to hunt for a good, more "recent" graphic of brands, but threw those up just as a heads up as to the types of media that News Corp. has (i.e., not just Faux Snooze).
GB_RN
(2,384 posts)Poor Rupert. The wrinkly old fuck will have to fly back from London for this😂
republianmushroom
(13,704 posts)pfitz59
(10,391 posts)Stripped of his bogus US citizenship and sent to The Hague for crimes against humanity. He is filthy through and through.