Democrats planning to sit on all GOP select committees
Source: The Hill
It is our intent to seat members on every select committee, every subcommittee that the leadership on the majority side advances, Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) told reporters in the Capitol.
That move would mark a shift from the Republicans strategy in the last Congress, when GOP leaders boycotted the select committee formed to investigate the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol an abstention that some Republicans came to regret, since it left former President Trump without a line of defense throughout the marathon probe.
Aguilar said Democrats wont make the same mistake this cycle, when Republicans are poised to create a series of special committees to investigate the Biden administration and other facets of federal policy, including what Republicans consider the weaponization of the government to target Trump and other conservatives unfairly.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3807433-democrats-planning-to-sit-on-all-gop-select-committees/
ZonkerHarris
(24,228 posts)jimfields33
(15,808 posts)Fullduplexxx
(7,863 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,053 posts)Fullduplexxx
(7,863 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,053 posts)I'm sure that Carnival Cruz and Run Hawley Run would consider that.
Grins
(7,217 posts)mjvpi
(1,388 posts)It will be a huge waste of public servants time, but necessary in my view.
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)The repukes boycotted the committee after Speaker Pelosi rejected their initial selections. The problem we face now is that Speaker McCarthy can do the same thing. I sometimes wish she hadn't done that.
claudette
(3,575 posts)on the J6 committee other than the ones Pelosi did not approve. Gopers said NO. Thats not Pelosis fault
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)When she rejected these members, she set precedent for what McCarthy is going to do. She should have just accepted them and continued with he J6 Committee. It wold have revealed the same information with or without them.
Mr.Bill
(24,300 posts)if Pelosi had not rejected the people McCarthy tried to put on it. Imagine Gym Jordan screaming at all the witnesses.
NBachers
(17,116 posts)brooklynite
(94,585 posts)No, it wouldn't. The advantage of a unitary Committee is that the Hearing time could be programmed (remember the producer from ABC?) to present the Committee's findings. Having election-denial Republicans on the Committee would have diverted a large chunk to counter narratives and/or hostile questioning of public witnesses.
nb: I spoke to the J6 Committee producer last month. She thinks the Republicans will try the same model with their issues.
paleotn
(17,920 posts)claudette
(3,575 posts)NO Gopers chose to be on the committee. The J6 committee would not have been so productive and professional if Gym Jordan et al would have spoiled it. You have seen how they have behaved at other hearings.
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)IMHO, I don't think them being on the committee would have made a lick of difference. The same information would have been reported and the final report would have been the same.
claudette
(3,575 posts)if that is so, then Dems can send other Dems to serve on the committee. She gave Gopers a choice.
News Junkie
(312 posts)Reject Democrats he doesn't want. Then it would be up to us whether to keep offering replacements or pull out. I suspect we do the first.
brooklynite
(94,585 posts)Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)Why should she have accepted people who'd have only been disruptive and are quite possibly being investigated themselves for participating in the event??
The Roux Comes First
(1,299 posts)Fraction of the good work the committee shared with a huge national audience.
It was a truly stupid move that they then boycotted the J6 in an apparent fit of pique - or perhaps they did not feel they had equally-talented saboteurs on their bench.
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)difference. The final report would have been exactly the same. What she did was set McCarthy up to do the same thing. He's already kicked some of our folks off of committees and subcommittees.
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,291 posts)Javaman
(62,530 posts)Dems read the rules, repukes dont.
The Dems can tie up the repuke committees with procedural issues
😂😂😂
Septua
(2,256 posts)..Jim Jordan types explain the justification for investigating Biden for influence peddling and weaponizing/politicizing the FBI/DOJ when Trump peddled influence and weaponized/politicized the entire Executive branch of the government soon as he realized he could.
It is simply, hypocrisy in action.
dem4decades
(11,296 posts)Martin68
(22,803 posts)all the inanity.
Drum
(9,161 posts)Response to brooklynite (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
AZLD4Candidate
(5,692 posts)"Waah, I'm being canceled because I'm a racist/sexist/homophobe/xenophobe/bigot and I'm being called out on it."
"Waah, they are investigating me because I'm conservative, not because there is a treasure trove of evidence against me."
It's amazing how weak and stupid these people are.