Exclusive: Sen. Dianne Feinstein won't announce her plans for 2024 -- until 2024
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: Rawstory
In an exclusive interview with Raw Story, Californias senior senator announced shes not not running. In fact, she has no plans to decidelet alone announceher 2024 intentions until next year.
I need a little bit of time, so it's not this year, Feinstein told Raw Story at the Capitol Wednesday.
The 89-year-old incumbent says she isnt fazed by her currentor potentialDemocratic challengers.
Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/raw-investigates/is-dianne-feinstein-running/
madaboutharry
(42,031 posts)She will now face at least two other democrats in a primary if she chooses to run again.
Frasier Balzov
(4,943 posts)You're going to be 90 years old this June ma'am.
Be gracious and make way for a new generation.
Somebody like that very dynamic progressive Katie Porter might benefit from your endorsement.
Fiendish Thingy
(22,456 posts)But if you want to wait until 2024, DiFi, you go right ahead.
SouthernDem4ever
(6,619 posts)not fooled
(6,623 posts)and she's only diminishing her status dragging this out. Consistent to the end in not doing the right thing at this point.
Even Adam Schiff--not exactly a reckless rebel in the party--has announced.
Salviati
(6,059 posts)JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)rants
SouthernDem4ever
(6,619 posts)but if you insist.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)Its just the fact of the matter & there's no denying it.
I dont see people going off on her at all. She's done her job, its been a career, its time to go.
not fooled
(6,623 posts)she's not helping the situation by dragging things out.
Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)I have to be careful what I say about Feinstein because I'm on thin ice.
But ... yeah.
maxsolomon
(38,393 posts)Playing coy about it in January 2023 isn't particularly helpful to Porter or Schiff or the Dem Party.
Adding "I will announce my decision in (insert month prior to the filing deadline), 2023" to this vague statement would be fine.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)be running, and 2. the nominee will be one of the other candidates running for that seat regardless
Sneederbunk
(17,351 posts)republianmushroom
(22,137 posts)cstamm53
(58 posts)It's (way past) time for her to go.
It doesn't matter what she decides, Schiff will beat her.
brush
(61,033 posts)where your time is your own, no alarm clocks, no commutes, no boss, and as long as she's worked, no financial worries as Senators have liberal pensions and healthcare.
maxsolomon
(38,393 posts)She is her job. Her job sustains her.
brush
(61,033 posts)Response to brush (Reply #19)
maxsolomon This message was self-deleted by its author.
News Junkie
(312 posts)It's time.
Dorn
(562 posts)Whether she announces now or next year, she should keep her legacy positive, and avoid any chance of the California Senate seat being lost.
maxsolomon
(38,393 posts)Repukes only have support in the Tules.
Trueblue1968
(19,141 posts)I DO NOT THINK SHE IS MAKING THE CORRECT DECISION.
#LetUsKnowDiane !!!!!
LudwigPastorius
(14,377 posts)Omaha Steve
(108,681 posts)When she announces one or the other then it's news for sure.
