White House: No more TikTok on gov't devices within 30 days
Source: Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) The White House is giving all federal agencies 30 days to wipe TikTok off all government devices, as the Chinese-owned social media app comes under increasing scrutiny in Washington over security concerns.
The Office of Management and Budget calls the guidance, issued Monday, a critical step forward in addressing the risks presented by the app to sensitive government data. Some agencies, including the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security and State, already have restrictions in place; the guidance calls on the rest of the federal government to follow suit within 30 days.
The White House already does not allow TikTok on its devices.
The Biden-Harris Administration has invested heavily in defending our nations digital infrastructure and curbing foreign adversaries access to Americans data, said Chris DeRusha, the federal chief information security officer. This guidance is part of the Administrations ongoing commitment to securing our digital infrastructure and protecting the American peoples security and privacy.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/technology-politics-united-states-government-ap-top-news-business-95491774cf8f0fe3e2b9634658a22e56
COL Mustard
(8,208 posts)Just like they refused to get a COVID vaccine. Mark my words.
AZLD4Candidate
(6,778 posts)China has banned most non-Chinese apps in their country. . .time to do the same to theirs and then listen to them whine and bitch, demand respect (give none), make bold threats and then do nothing as always because they are the thinnest of paper tigers.
Roar at the pulpit, purr in reality.
MichMan
(17,140 posts)Polybius
(21,891 posts)If a lunatic proposes something good, we should support it.
tornado34jh
(1,527 posts)I don't use Tik Tok, but a lot of my friends do. I am going to be quite frank, millions of people use it, all over the world, and even if government officials don't use it while at work, I will bet you that they will use it on their personal phone. Here's the thing: How do you convince millions of people in the US to get rid of it, especially among those between 16-25? It's one thing to say that Tik Tok is a Chinese propaganda tool, but it's another to convince people to get rid of it. I think China knows that as long as people still use the app, they are none the wiser to what is going on behind the scenes. Also, since it's mostly targeted to people 16-25, people in that group probably think that Tik Tok is just another app to do certain things, probably because they don't see the threat of it.
I never used Tik Tok, so I can't speak for myself. But China knows that people will still use it, and people will find ways around it to use it. I am not saying this because I support China. I don't, but again, millions of people use it in the US alone, and again, I have friends that are liberal/democratic that use it. It's popular regardless of political affiliation, and people use it for comedy, singing, dancing, that sort of thing. So hypothetically, let's say that I am one of those people who use it. Assuming that I didn't know that Tik Tok was used by the Chinese government to collect data on people, I would think, "What dangers would lie with that? I don't see it as dangerous." The point is, people are not going to think it is dangerous because someone said that. They would need proof. Now are people going to disregard that even if there is, yes. However, I don't think that people will get rid of it because of course the app developers are not going to say that it is used by the Chinese government, hence they will not see a reason for why it should be banned.
AZLD4Candidate
(6,778 posts)it as a base for cupcakes.
tornado34jh
(1,527 posts)But again, how effective has the messaging been in regards to the potential dangers it poses? I also don't think most people really take Chinese data collection on Americans seriously because we never made it a big deal to begin it.
AZLD4Candidate
(6,778 posts)When I used it in Thailand, it got monitored there.
Tarc
(10,601 posts)I can picture the Congressional hearings now;
I'm not sure echoing Joe McCarthy is the vibe that the DU is really aiming for...
AZLD4Candidate
(6,778 posts)while may be incorporate in the Cayman islands isn't giving data to the CCP? That's SOP here.
The government here can shut down any company here immediately if they don't do what the CCP requires (look at what they did to Jack Ma).
The CCP says it doesn't do that, but they also say they don't have concentration camps filled with Uyghurs in slave labor and don't work to destroy the language, culture, and traditions of Tibetans.
Again, as stated many times, I live in China.
https://www.npr.org/2022/11/16/1137076864/fbi-says-china-could-use-tiktok-to-spy-on-americans-including-government-workers
ancianita
(43,307 posts)RandySF
(84,146 posts)AZLD4Candidate
(6,778 posts)That's all I'm going to say as this is a post looking for a fight based on the aggressive nature.
BadgerKid
(5,002 posts)ancianita
(43,307 posts)The Dept of Commerce is the biggest holder of databases in our government. It knows CCP data collection when it sees it.
With China racing ahead of the U.S. in General AI development, any and all international data it can draw works toward that development.
MichMan
(17,140 posts)Search showed no support here at DU based on the comments
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100214091186
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213846571
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142567112
RandySF
(84,146 posts)Response to RandySF (Reply #12)
ancianita This message was self-deleted by its author.
Skittles
(171,679 posts)I mean, seriously, WTF
ancianita
(43,307 posts)Like spy agencies? Are they supposed to?
ancianita
(43,307 posts)https://www.techdirt.com/search/?q=FBI+and+social+media
And the FBI isn't the only one.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2022/02/23/meet-the-secretive-surveillance-wizards-helping-the-fbi-and-ice-wiretap-facebook-and-google-users/?sh=27d306823f0f
MichMan
(17,140 posts)ancianita
(43,307 posts)The third link on my previous post shows what Forbes knows about outside-of-government use of data it turns over for law enforcement.
Otherwise, I'm not sure what you mean.