Tester to join Manchin, Republicans in blocking DOL green investment rule
Source: The Hill
Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mt.) will join Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) in voting for a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution to block a Labor Department rule allowing the consideration of environmental factors in money managers decisions.
In a statement Wednesday, Tester said he will vote for the resolution, which concerns use of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in investment in some retirement accounts. While Manchin has backed the resolution from the beginning, Tester had been noncommittal before Wednesday.
At a time when working families are dealing with higher costs, from health care to housing, we need to be focused on ensuring Montanans retirement savings are on the strongest footing possible, Tester said. Im opposing this Biden administration rule because I believe it undermines retirement accounts for working Montanans and is wrong for my state.
Manchin has long been vocally against the rule, co-sponsoring the CRA resolution in February.
Read more: https://thehill-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/3879388-tester-to-join-manchin-republicans-in-blocking-dol-green-investment-rule/amp/?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIKAGwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16776959501783&csi=0&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fpolicy%2Fenergy-environment%2F3879388-tester-to-join-manchin-republicans-in-blocking-dol-green-investment-rule%2F
HUAJIAO
(2,730 posts)If I want to invest in 'green' companies or whatever, that is my choice, not theirs to make for me.
onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)Probatim
(3,235 posts)Morons.
HUAJIAO
(2,730 posts)jimfields33
(19,382 posts)What they dont want is for every retirement fund to only be allowed those.
HUAJIAO
(2,730 posts)William Seger
(12,281 posts)Sorry to be skeptical, but his reason just doesn't quite have the "ring of truth."
Freethinker65
(11,202 posts)Cha
(317,718 posts)a blood red state.
So our Planet suffers like the magas want it to.
flashman13
(2,219 posts)Show me one credible study that indicates that considering environmental factors in any way reduces return on investment. It has only been in the very recent past that large corporations have even attempted to be environmentally aware, even if only for PR purposes, in order to become better corporate citizens. With your vote you are undermining that process.
We have enough examples here in Montana of the ill effects of corporate environmental degradation (Butte/Anaconda automatically comes to mind). Article IX Section 1 of the Montana state constitution states "
1) The state and each person shall maintain and improve a clean and healthful environment in Montana for present and future generations. (2) The legislature shall provide for the administration and enforcement of this duty." Further, "in a 1999 landmark decision, MEIC v. Montana DEQ, the Montana Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Montanans constitutional right to a clean and healthful environment (Article IX, Section 1) is a fundamental right and one that is intended to be preventative in nature" (as per Montana Environmental Information Center).
Given what your home state requires of all of us, how can you in good conscience vote for the Congressional Review Act?
CrispyQ
(40,806 posts)Looking one quarter ahead instead of seven generations.
underpants
(195,571 posts)Oh okay.
LaMouffette
(2,594 posts)the 2024 election.
NewHendoLib
(61,698 posts)Still Sensible
(2,870 posts)of no consequence, political move for Senator Tester. If he is to be reelected in deep red Montana, he must maintain some level of "Maverick" bona fides. If he loses that, might as well just let the whomever the batshit Rs nominate run unopposed.
Fact is, this seems pretty shrewd to me. As soon as Manchin announced his opposition, the measure was destined to fail... so Jon gets some ammo for his Montana bona fides by making a move that has no practical consequence.
MontanaFarmer
(761 posts)JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)MontanaFarmer
(761 posts)He takes a few positions and/or votes like this, unpopular with our own side, every election cycle. But unlike mansion and that idiot from Arizona, you won't find many, if any (DREAM act the exception) core issues or votes that he doesn't vote the party position on. Montana has changed, politically, since he was first elected, and he has had to change a bit along with it. Believe me when i tell you, we're lucky to have him. Steve daines will look like a Saint when compared to a senator rosendale/zinke.
Tom Rinaldo
(23,181 posts)We have long known that only Manchin stands between WV sending a Right Wing Republican Senator to Washington. Same pretty much goes for Tester and Montana. Trump won both those states with huge margins. Democrats are defending a lot more Senate seats in 2024 than are Republicans.
Is this something Biden can veto?
Fiendish Thingy
(22,458 posts)Nobodys going to kill the filibuster to pass this bill- its all political theatre.
onenote
(46,056 posts)Polybius
(21,631 posts)We need you to win in '24.
Celerity
(54,002 posts)MichMan
(16,874 posts)I worked too damn hard for my IRA to have an advisor be allowed to make investment decisions that are not in my best interest.
