Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jgo

(1,021 posts)
Thu Apr 20, 2023, 08:52 AM Apr 2023

Judicial record undermines Clarence Thomas defence in luxury gifts scandal

Source: The Guardian

Republican mega-donor Harlan Crow was linked to a conservative group that had court business while Thomas was on the bench.

The justice, who is the longest-serving member of the nation’s highest court and arguably its most staunch conservative, insisted he had taken advice that “this sort of personal hospitality from close personal friends” did not have to be reported under federal ethics laws. He emphasized that the friend in question “did not have business before the court”.

But a close look at Thomas’s judicial activities from the time he became friends with Crow, in the mid-1990s, suggests that the statement might fall short of the full picture. It reveals that a conservative organization affiliated with Crow did have business before the supreme court while Thomas was on the bench.

In addition, Crow has been connected to several groups that over the years have lobbied the supreme court through so-called “amicus briefs” that provide legal arguments supporting a plaintiff or defendant.


Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/apr/20/clarence-thomas-supreme-court-harlan-crow-luxury-gifts

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Alexander Of Assyria

(7,839 posts)
1. Don't forget about One Ton Ginnie! Her vicious politicsgets a pass when it comes to Uncle's ethics??
Thu Apr 20, 2023, 08:55 AM
Apr 2023

housecat

(3,138 posts)
8. meh. Who complains about tfg's fat "shame" in hundreds of cartoons?
Thu Apr 20, 2023, 11:53 AM
Apr 2023

It's ok to laugh at male fat but not female? And Clarence Thomas doesn't know he is Black, and a statement isn't defamatory if it is true.

intheflow

(30,187 posts)
9. Calling a Black man "Uncle" is racist.
Thu Apr 20, 2023, 12:44 PM
Apr 2023


I have also posted about not fat-shaming TFG because there are a million other things he should be shamed for, all of them based on his actions rather than his physical shape. It's intellectually lazy when talking about politics. Every time I read about the clothing, hair, face, body type, and accent on here it just sounds to me like the left version of Republicans whining about HRC's looks or love of pantsuits and Michelle Obama being referred to as an ape. Or, to quote Michelle, our ideal should be that when they go low, we go high.

bucolic_frolic

(55,180 posts)
2. I wonder what's up with that whole Thomas thing
Thu Apr 20, 2023, 09:04 AM
Apr 2023

The controversy over his confirmation hearings. Sounds from that article like there was financial influence. Wonder if he was under other types of pressure. He was so silent for decades. At this point it's legit to ask if he's got a lot being held over his head.

 

Alexander Of Assyria

(7,839 posts)
3. Silent for decades, yes. Strange man. Then opens mouth and promptly inserts foot.
Thu Apr 20, 2023, 09:07 AM
Apr 2023

Maybe more intelligent than we all think for those decades!?

Scrivener7

(59,534 posts)
4. This is just filthy. And Crow is obnoxiously holding himself above us all.
Thu Apr 20, 2023, 09:27 AM
Apr 2023
Asked whether he ever considered their friendship as a ticket to quid pro quo, he replied: “Every single relationship – a baby’s relationship to his mom – has some kind of reciprocity.”


KPN

(17,379 posts)
10. There's been tons of filth lately. It's been and is being normalized. "Oh well, that's the way the
Thu Apr 20, 2023, 01:02 PM
Apr 2023

world works." Sadly, Thomas' filth was obvious in his confirmation hearing 32 years ago.

mopinko

(73,732 posts)
6. i'd like to see someone flyspeck those amicus briefs.
Thu Apr 20, 2023, 09:39 AM
Apr 2023

these fuckers arent just ginning up these cases, shepherding them through their rotten judges, but when they get to scotus, they lay out EXACTLY what they want them to find.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judicial record undermine...