King Charles III crowned in ancient rite at uncertain moment
Source: AP
By DANICA KIRKA and JILL LAWLESS 8 minutes ago
LONDON (AP) King Charles III was crowned Saturday at Westminster Abbey, in a ceremony built on ancient traditions at a time when the British monarchy faces an uncertain future.
Trumpets sounded inside the medieval abbey and the congregation shouted God save King Charles as the ceremony began in front of more than 2,000 guests, including world leaders, aristocrats and celebrities. Outside, thousands of troops, tens of thousands of spectators and a smattering of protesters converged along a route that the king traveled from Buckingham Palace in a gilt-trimmed, horse-drawn carriage.
It was the final mile of a seven-decade journey for Charles from heir to monarch.
To the royal family and government, the occasion code-named Operation Golden Orb is a display of heritage, tradition and spectacle unmatched around the world.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/king-charles-iii-coronation-westminster-abbey-britain-a4f05b3d7413521c439348684fd7a782
Follow APs coverage of King Charles III at https://apnews.com/hub/king-charles-iii
purr-rat beauty
(1,215 posts)Queen E was at least had enigmatic character, this guy is a schmuck
diva77
(7,880 posts)That would create some mystery - and help give the aura of being enigmatic.
Perhaps something like this:

Freddie
(10,097 posts)My great-grandparents came over on the boat from Cornwall so I consider myself an honorary subject of the King.
The TV keeps showing the crowd
I see William and Kate and their children of course, Prince Edward and Sophie, Princess Anne, Harry a few rows back, Camillas children Tom and Laura. No Prince Andrew, was he disinvited?
speak easy
(12,595 posts)Henry VIII's State Religion.
twodogsbarking
(18,539 posts)speak easy
(12,595 posts)No State Church in America, whatever the RW may be thinking.
melm00se
(5,153 posts)but it is their bullshit.
paleotn
(22,136 posts)More of their bullshit.
MayReasonRule
(4,096 posts)Pfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft...
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)And brings in a ton of money to England. So whatever.
paleotn
(22,136 posts)it's a complete waste. Maybe doing something more useful than barbaric cosplay might be better? I think so.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)I've seen in a few sources that royal tourism brings in about 2 billion a year to England. The "royal sovereign fund" isnt near that amount. 1000s of Americans just spent a ton to go see the coronation.
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)belongs to the people.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)Whether WE like it or not, theyr'e an attraction & it pays off.
Now ME, I'd go over NEXT week after everyone leaves!
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)them. Have you ever been to Williamsburg VA? All sorts of ways to bring history alive...you don't need super expensive useless royals who are pretty crappy people IMHO for tourism.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)Enjoyed it very much
Baitball Blogger
(52,241 posts)and old grandmum in a white coat that was too close to a horse trotting through the mud.
paleotn
(22,136 posts)Anachronistic bullshit. Now that the Brits are over their royal cosplay, can they focus on their real problem?
Javaman
(65,637 posts)BumRushDaShow
(168,982 posts)


When I was in London in 1970, I saw that coronation chair (it was plopped in Westminster Abbey in an aisle). It is literally covered with graffiti carved into the wood over the centuries by who knows how many people. I had thought that it would get covered with some cushioning and fabric but nope... just the sides and arm rests were covered for this ceremony, and the rest was left bare so you can see the "I was here" stuff.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)I zoomed in & you can read several things.
Which one's yours?
BumRushDaShow
(168,982 posts)I don't know how they have it displayed nowadays although from what I understand, they still leave it out for tourists to look at... But at least back in 1970, you could actually touch the thing and even the tour guide was cracking up at some of the stuff that was carved on it.




And it's on both sides, front and back.
Javaman
(65,637 posts)Because tourists are money!
Bayard
(29,478 posts)And I find the history of the monarchy fascinating.
I won't be watching this one though--its Kentucky tradition day as well!

orleans
(36,861 posts)but at any rate -- i think it's hysterical!!
emulatorloo
(46,154 posts)Demnation
(435 posts)gopiscrap
(24,708 posts)Being an immigrant from Europe, I learned long ago that the "American" way, isn't the only way
RobinA
(10,478 posts)If we're going to respect other cultures, lets respect other cultures. I, for one, find it fascinating. I find it interesting that the originators of all this ceremony, the ones whose successors currently live in Rome, get much less criticism for their over-the-topness in the service of some figment that lives in the sky than the Brits for their glitzy ceremonies. Tradition.
milestogo
(23,012 posts)on their way to daycare.
LudwigPastorius
(14,630 posts)So, he's basically a televangelist without the charisma.
CountAllVotes
(22,194 posts)They don't do much for his overall appearance.
That's all I have to say!
hamsterjill
(17,533 posts)It always looks like to me that Camilla wears some sort of breastplate under her clothes.
There
.that was horribly tacky but its the truth.
CountAllVotes
(22,194 posts)Using the imagination here ...
!!
RobinA
(10,478 posts)they could lose the bows as well. I'm sure they have some meaning. It would be nice to see a documentary on what all that stuff means.
TygrBright
(21,357 posts)lees1975
(7,010 posts)Be that as it may, I'm glad that American took the exit ramp in 1776, from the absurdity of thinking that one's birth and lineage is a qualification for political leadership, from a state controlled church. Institutional monarchy, in defending itself, was deadly to millions of people who gave their lives, not for their own freedom, but to keep their royal family rich and in power.
No thank you.
Xolodno
(7,345 posts)Not to be rude to others who find it fascinating, interesting, etc. It wasn't my cup of tea.
It's their tradition so I don't have much standing to offer an opinion. Even though I do descend from aristocracy, its from a different empire. This national tradition is not hurting anyone anymore than the US tradition of the inauguration. So good luck to them.
Redleg
(6,906 posts)But if the British people want to have a king, let them have one. I just don't get why so many Americans seem dazzled by the royal family.