Indiana Army veteran convicted in road rage killing of Muslim man
Source: Associated Press
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) A suburban Indianapolis Army veteran has been convicted in the road rage shooting death of a Muslim man, after witnesses said he hurled ethnic and religious insults at the victim, including yelling, Go back to your country, before opening fire.
A Marion County jury convicted Dustin E. Passarelli, 37, of murder on Wednesday after a three-day trial over the February 2019 killing of 32-year-old Mustafa Ayoubi. Passarelli, of Plainfield, could get up to 65 years in prison when hes sentenced June 21 on the murder charge.
He was also convicted of a firearm enhancement charge that could boost his sentence by up to 20 years, the county prosecutors office said.
Defense attorney, Chris Eskew, told The Indianapolis Star that he and Passarelli were disappointed by the verdict, but he declined to comment further about the case until after the sentencing.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/road-rage-fatal-shooting-muslim-man-indiana-8a76fe0adf4639c2df40fe3c6b1ba840
Johnny2X2X
(19,140 posts)Glad he got convicted, in Red States though, you have to wonder if the governor will pardon him, I mean he is a white person who killed a non white person. That's where Republicans are at, a pardon of this killer would make Republicans happy.
lostinhere
(78 posts)I live in Indianapolis and the state is solid red except for a few metro areas, particularly Indianapolis and Bloomington.
I doubt a pardon will occur and article supports my belief. Further in (a lot further in), the article says,
Passarelli was not charged with a hate crime. The FBI had said it was looking into whether Ayoubis killing involved a federal civil rights violation, but no federal charges were ever filed.
Six weeks after Ayoubis killing, Indiana lawmakers passed a hate crimes bill that included a provision allowing judges to impose longer sentences for crimes motivated by bias.
Before the bill became law, Indiana was one of five states without a hate crime law.
However, I've been wrong before and will be in the future.
LiberalFighter
(51,136 posts)nycbos
(6,039 posts)I'm guessing the legal system still has a lot of catching up to do.
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)... wanted to call.
The short version: The defendant claimed to have PTSD (among other military-related stuff) which affected his actions; his lawyers had him examined by an MD from a VA Medical Center in support of that. In late 2019, when getting ready for the trial, they listed the MD as a witness. The state demurred, essentially arguing that the defendant was trying to use an insanity defense without actually asserting that formally. (They claimed self-defense.) The trial court agreed to a hearing, but that couldn't take place until 8/2021. The judge agreed with the state. The defendant appealed. The appellate court heard the case sometime in 2022 and upheld the lower court's decision in early 2023. They tried and convicted him.
He was held without bond during the delay.
https://law.justia.com/cases/indiana/court-of-appeals/2023/22a-cr-01116.html
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)marble falls
(57,323 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,047 posts)Martin68
(22,900 posts)electric_blue68
(14,955 posts)🤬