Indiana doctor reprimanded for talking publicly about Ohio 10-year-old's abortion
Source: AP
By Tom Davies an hour ago
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) An Indiana board decided Thursday night to reprimand an Indianapolis doctor after finding that she violated patient privacy laws by talking publicly about providing an abortion to a 10-year-old rape victim from neighboring Ohio.
The state Medical Licensing Board voted that Dr. Caitlin Bernard didnt abide by privacy laws when she told a newspaper reporter about the girls treatment in a case that became a flashpoint in the national abortion debate days after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last summer.
The board, however, rejected accusations from Indianas Republican attorney general that Bernard violated state law by not reporting the child abuse to Indiana authorities. Board members chose to fine Bernard $3,000 for the violations, turning down a request from the attorney generals office to suspend Bernards license. The board issued no restrictions on her practice of medicine.
Bernard has consistently defended her actions, and she told the board on Thursday that she followed Indianas reporting requirements and hospital policy by notifying hospital social workers about the child abuse and that the girls rape was already being investigated by Ohio authorities. Bernards lawyers also said that she didnt release any identifying information about the girl that would break privacy laws.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/indiana-abortion-ohio-girl-raped-caitlin-bernard-4de25dd09f61fbaed4a83bce34d7fa83
Marthe48
(17,023 posts)She saved a child's life. Damn the oppresive slavers who wanted that child to die.
SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)Typical repuglican.
Stargazer99
(2,599 posts)The doctor was only trying to keep the child from death a 10 yr olds body cannot handle pregnancy, how about the life of the 10yrs old and many other women who might die from carrying a child?Pro life, who in the hell are you kidding?
lark
(23,156 posts)walkingman
(7,667 posts)lark
(23,156 posts)I've never dated a repug, so never even came close to having sex with one of those untouchables. Yay.
raging moderate
(4,308 posts)So strange of them.
lark
(23,156 posts)cab67
(3,007 posts)Last edited Fri May 26, 2023, 01:16 PM - Edit history (1)
He's going to continue to try to strip Dr. Bernard of her license until he's out of office, and probably for some time after that as well.
My partner fell afoul of a bully in her former department a number of years ago. He leveled a long list of allegations against her with the internal review board. The allegations all fell into a spectrum between "weak" and "ludicrous," but he kept harping at them to find her non-compliant. In the end, under pressure from this one person, they found her non-compliant on one of the allegations, and it was a flagrantly bad decision on their part - it de-legitimized the IRB for many on campus. A lot of people could tell there was some sort of collusion going on. But the turd that walks as a man does who filed the complaints kept trying to push others on campus to sanction my partner until she left the institution.
The Indiana AG is acting just like the bully. This form of discipline won't be enough for him.
2naSalit
(86,791 posts)Intent with all of them. They now have official permission to bully and so they will until we stop them.
Botany
(70,584 posts).... her from getting treated in OH. The Dr. did the right thing to keep the girl from having to suffer even
more pain in carrying the baby to term. Christo Fascists
The man accused of raping a 10-year-old girl who traveled to Indiana for an abortion was indicted by a grand jury in Ohio Thursday, in a case that became a flashpoint in the debate about the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Gerson Fuentes, 27, was charged with two felony counts of rape in the indictment filed in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in Columbus.
snip
The man accused of raping a 10-year-old girl who traveled to Indiana for an abortion was indicted by a grand jury in Ohio Thursday, in a case that became a flashpoint in the debate about the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
snip
Fuentes was arrested on July 12, and he confessed to raping the child, according to separate documents filed in Franklin County municipal court. He was charged with the rape of a minor and if convicted, faces a life sentence, as well as deportation, the documents said.
Hekate
(90,810 posts)We have to keep it front and center that she was so far below the age of consent that it really amounts to rape by a pedophile. And that trying to carry a pregnancy to term could at best rip up her insides and at worst kill her.
Initech
(100,103 posts)CanonRay
(14,117 posts)where she's free to practice medicine.
pazzyanne
(6,557 posts)"Bernards lawyers also said that she didnt release any identifying information about the girl that would break privacy laws."
Discussing a case without identifying the people involved does not breach privacy laws in most, if not all cases.
yardwork
(61,711 posts)They don't want the public to learn that there are ten year olds who get pregnant and need abortions.
They don't want the public to learn about how women suffer when they're denied life-saving abortions during miscarriages.
The goal is to threaten doctors so that these truths are kept secret.
pfitz59
(10,391 posts)is how the forced-birthers get power.