Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes reports to prison to serve her 11-year sentence for fraud
Source: CBS
BY ELIZABETH NAPOLITANO
UPDATED ON: MAY 30, 2023 / 1:39 PM / MONEYWATCH
Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes was taken into custody Tuesday to begin serving her 11-year sentence at a Texas prison for swindling investors of hundreds of millions of dollars and lying about her biotech company's blood-testing technology.
A California court convicted Holmes, 39, on four counts of fraud and conspiracy. The judge presiding over the case recommended she serve time at a prison camp in Bryan, Texas. She leaves behind a nearly 2-year-old son, who was born weeks before the start of her trial; and a 3-month-old daughter, who was conceived after her conviction.
Holmes, 39, will be incarcerated in a minimum-security women's prison camp in Bryan, Texas, located about 95 miles northwest of Houston, where she grew up aspiring to become a technology visionary along the lines of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs.
Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/theranos-ceo-elizabeth-holmes-prison-sentence-trial/
tinrobot
(10,927 posts)SledDriver
(2,061 posts)Nice of them to give her so much time between conviction and "reporting" to prison. Sounds about white.
How about once the guilty verdict is delivered, cuffs and off to jail to await sentencing. From jail you go to the sentencing, 11 years, back into cuffs and off to prison. Why does she get a YEAR off to take a vacation, get pregnant and have a baby, have a life?
Kennah
(14,352 posts)2naSalit
(86,915 posts)Talk about murikkin exceptionalism.
I thought she had two kids in that time but whatever. At least it's more then ten years. She deserves every day of it.
Joinfortmill
(14,500 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,470 posts)Kennah
(14,352 posts)RAB910
(3,538 posts)Fla Dem
(23,871 posts)Most women are sentence to this type of facility because they pose little risk.
It may not be as horrendous as Sing Sing or Alcatraz nor as stringent as a penitentiary, but it's still confinement for 11 years unless she gets parole. That's 11 years of not seeing her family for any meaningful amount of time, having no freedom to come and go as she pleases, housed with 700 other inmates, many who may not be the nicest people. Not to mention having to share a cell with 3 other women. Women can be very cruel. This is not summer camp.
Do I think she deserves it? Absolutely, but to bush off her incarceration as no big deal is not looking at the whole picture.
RAB910
(3,538 posts)Fla Dem
(23,871 posts)I'm not sure if minority men are treated the same as a non-minority woman or minority women for that matter in the federal system. I would like to think sentencing is based on their crime regardless if a minority or non-minority, male or female, and their prior history. Men and women who commit federal crimes are incarcerated in Federal prisons. Woman go to federal womans prisons which have a lower level of incarceration than men as they are considered a lower risk.
Minority woman, if convicted of a federal crime, get the same treatment as non-minority females. Basically, because there are "woman only" FEDERAL prisons. Those prisons are regulated by the Federal gov't as opposed to state prisons which are under the regulation of the states and therefore the equality of regulation probably differs from state to state.
brooklynite
(94,939 posts)...Prison security levels are based on the convict's propensity for violence and risk of escape.
RAB910
(3,538 posts)maxsolomon
(33,449 posts)Harsher punishment!
RAB910
(3,538 posts)compared to the poor and minority prisoners
maxsolomon
(33,449 posts)so it's fair to all. Got it.
RAB910
(3,538 posts)Why do you want the white wealthy woman treated better?!?!
maxsolomon
(33,449 posts)What a ridiculous exchange.
RAB910
(3,538 posts)maxsolomon
(33,449 posts)Shame we can't see eye to eye on the proper level of cruelty that a federal prison sentence should entail.
RAB910
(3,538 posts)I couldn't help but notice you did not like it when I treated your comments like you did mine.
Response to RAB910 (Reply #30)
maxsolomon This message was self-deleted by its author.
Mysterian
(4,601 posts)Please share!
msfiddlestix
(7,288 posts)FakeNoose
(32,882 posts)Chump probably would have given her a 50% discount on her presidential pardon.
msfiddlestix
(7,288 posts)mpcamb
(2,880 posts)and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud."
We need to do better when it's trump's time for an orange jump suit.
Let's think about ways to make that happen.
maxsolomon
(33,449 posts)9 blissful years till we'll have to hear about her again.
LaMouffette
(2,042 posts)got just 5 months AND was released after serving just 100 days of his sentence?!
I guess swindling Americans out of millions of dollars of lost tax revenues is no big deal, but swindling some wealthy private investors? Now THAT is a serious crime, worthy of years, not months, of prison!
Xolodno
(6,410 posts)...investors, banks, etc. should do their due diligence.
But she was willing to roll the product out when it had a 50% failure rate that could have ended killing a lot of people.
Bernie Madoff and Jordan Belfort got hit hard because they never believed they would ever be caught and not once realized it was coming down around them. She may have had similar thoughts.