The Supreme Court leaves Indian Child Welfare Act intact
Source: NPR
The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected all challenges to the Indian Child Welfare Act, handing a massive win to Native American tribes.
The 7-2 opinions, written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, left the statute entirely intact. Justices Thomas and Alito dissented.
The case pit several prospective adoptive parents and the state of Texas against the act a federal law aimed at preventing Native American children from being separated from their extended families and their tribes.
Read more: https://www.npr.org/2023/06/15/1182121455/indian-child-welfare-act-supreme-court-decision
AkFemDem
(2,508 posts)Preserves tribal rights and protects from forced adoption outside of native community.
Of course Thomas and Alito dissent. Because Thomas and Alito.
mountain grammy
(29,209 posts)Holy shit.. I'm stunned, shocked, and completely happy..
hlthe2b
(114,674 posts)rsdsharp
(12,093 posts)Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)Colonial mentality keeps raising its monstrous head, America is its current home.
Thomas and Alito again confirmed
they are Nazis.p, Thomas again confirmed he hates the color of his skin.
Nazis
never
ever ever a friend, black or white, or Asov.
RandySF
(86,194 posts)iluvtennis
(21,527 posts)Shellback Squid
(10,153 posts)Shellback Squid
(10,153 posts)cbabe
(6,812 posts)US supreme court upholds protections for Native American children
Children can continue to be protected under law preventing removal of kids from their families for fostering or adoption
Ed Pilkington in New York
@edpilkington
Thu 15 Jun 2023 10.08 EDT
About 486 tribes and 59 regional tribal organizations filed supporting briefs to the Supreme Court arguing that the ICWA should be upheld. They argued that the legislation was in the best interests of Native children and that for the purposes of this law, Native Americans should be regarded not as a racial group but as a political class with their own sovereign status.
Groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) warned that overturning the ICWA would put the very existence of tribes in jeopardy. Experts warned it could also cast into doubt hundreds of treaties drawn up between US and state governments and sovereign tribal entities.
more
(Using children as pawns to force sovereignty issue for massive land, oil, water etc. grab.)
2naSalit
(103,806 posts)Good for the Native Americans, this has been an issue for a long time. Now if the white people will stop kidnapping and killing the women and girls, that would be good too.
speak easy
(12,598 posts)Killing women and girls is the White Man's manifest destiny
ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)I am so happyI didnt expect this
BlueKota
(5,552 posts)and decent rulings by four of the six Republicans on the court may be an attempt at image control and to head off further calls for oversight from the Senate? Obviously Alito and Thomas are too far into the septic tank to even be bothered by appearance or potential oversight.
Maybe I am just too much of a skeptical bitch, but I don't believe the majority of current Republicans do anything simply because it's the just and legally correct thing to do.
Merlot
(9,696 posts)Nothing wrong with a little skepticism - especially when dealing with republicans.
Skepticism aside, this is very good news. I was worried about this one.
BlueKota
(5,552 posts)No matter what the reason
ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)Wouldnt surprise me
moniss
(9,149 posts)on the proverbial head.
lark
(26,113 posts)They are scarily bad, the worst of the worst. Well, Cannon is probably as bad or worse, but she doesn;t have the clout these 2 do.
Bayard
(30,271 posts)The Tribes have already lost enough of their identities without any more help.
Glad to see some good can still come from this Court.
republianmushroom
(22,697 posts)Gidney N Cloyd
(19,847 posts)Wild blueberry
(8,372 posts)and GOOD.
Thank you.
moniss
(9,149 posts)also important to note that on some of the issues raised, like a discrimination claim, the decision did not reach a conclusion but rather dismissed those based on standing etc. This leaves open the possibility for these quack GQP "Legal Foundations" to come back in with cases concocted in a way as to try to overcome the issues of standing etc. and get another kick at trying to diminish the ICWA by claiming it is impermissibly discriminatory.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(182,015 posts)Warpy
(114,668 posts)and sent to Indian schools run by well meaning but totally ignorant people who thought they could somehow "whiten" them and put them into the mainstream. Some were adopted into white families as tiny children. Instead of feeling like they could exist in both worlds, they felt they had no place to exist, at all.
Similar efforts hadn't worked on the Irish, I have no clue why anyone thought they'd work on indigenous people.
I have no idea of the machinations behind the scenes that caused everybody but the execrable Alito and Thomas to uphold good law.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.