Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jgo

(1,021 posts)
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 09:45 AM Jun 2023

Alito disputes new ProPublica report that says justice failed to disclose trip with billionaire who

Source: CNN

Justice Samuel Alito did not disclose a luxury 2008 trip he took in which a hedge fund billionaire flew him on a private jet, even though the businessman would later repeatedly ask the Supreme Court to intervene on his behalf, ProPublica reported.

In a highly unusual move, Alito preemptively disputed the nature of the report before it published Tuesday night, authoring an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal in which he acknowledged knowing billionaire Paul Singer but downplaying their relationship.

The new report adds to the growing list of ethics questions surrounding the court, which have become a key focus of congressional Democrats. Earlier this year, reporting by ProPublica about a relationship between Justice Clarence Thomas and a frequent Republican donor led to calls for greater transparency about the financial disclosure process for the Supreme Court.

The publication said Singer flew Alito to Alaska on a private jet and that the justice did not report the fishing trip or the private jet flight on his annual financial disclosure or recuse himself from cases involving Singer’s hedge fund that came before the court. In the years following the 2008 trip, the billionaire’s hedge fund “came before the court at least 10 times in cases where his role was often covered by the legal press and mainstream media,” ProPublica reported.


Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/21/politics/samuel-alito-paul-singer-propublica/index.html

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alito disputes new ProPublica report that says justice failed to disclose trip with billionaire who (Original Post) jgo Jun 2023 OP
Alito is dishonest. He has zero integrity. He can't be trusted. He must be removed. Oopsie Daisy Jun 2023 #1
alito lies Marthe48 Jun 2023 #2
Receipts, MFer EYESORE 9001 Jun 2023 #3
Some are born to crook it over others. Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #4
Thank you for this excellent post from the great Octafish. hedda_foil Jun 2023 #5
I think ProPublica has a better record than this twit......... turbinetree Jun 2023 #6
I think ProPublica has a better track record than this twit......... turbinetree Jun 2023 #7
The Roberts' Court (Conservative majority) is a disgrace and Golden Raisin Jun 2023 #8
just the fact that he has to make excuses for this trip down to the wine and Blues Heron Jun 2023 #9
He even gets public officials to lie on his behalf muriel_volestrangler Jun 2023 #10
Investigate the Supreme Court, Bayard Jun 2023 #11
And while they're at it, how about investigations into those making the bribes? thenelm1 Jun 2023 #13
compromised llashram Jun 2023 #12
Clairvoyant Roy Rolling Jun 2023 #14
Another filthy fascist whoring for billionaires dalton99a Jun 2023 #15
"downplaying their relationship." llmart Jun 2023 #16
He posted his rebuttal BEFORE PRO PUBLICA POSTED THEIR ARTICLE Novara Jun 2023 #17
Like someone did with the Dobbs opinion nuxvomica Jun 2023 #23
Alito's defense of his free private jet trip and non-recusal reeks of desperation dalton99a Jun 2023 #18
This is so binary Picaro Jun 2023 #19
And he either had to or didn't. Igel Jun 2023 #27
FUCK Alito and FUCK Thomas Blue Owl Jun 2023 #20
Did he barely know him or were they friends? V850i Jun 2023 #21
Supreme Court Stench! RussBLib Jun 2023 #22
Alito or ProPublica TwoInchMessia Jun 2023 #24
Why? mercuryblues Jun 2023 #26
The WSJ seems to be open for business, renting out space. yardwork Jun 2023 #25

Marthe48

(23,175 posts)
2. alito lies
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 09:58 AM
Jun 2023

he lied about protecting Roe. If he lies about one thing, he'll lie about another.

If he actually represented a religion, you know, as a member, not from the bench of the (formerly)supreme court pretending to be a judge, you can bet his robes would be ermine and as he left any place after visiting, he'd either be zipping his pants or dabbing a napkin at his mouth. He's not giving up power, ease, or any other of the 7 sins he practices.

turbinetree

(27,551 posts)
7. I think ProPublica has a better track record than this twit.........
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 10:29 AM
Jun 2023

just saying.....he helped gut the voting rights, deny the right to privacy.....unions he hates unions.....just for starters.....but give him a free meal at the Federalist Society get together, why he's all in....

Golden Raisin

(4,755 posts)
8. The Roberts' Court (Conservative majority) is a disgrace and
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 10:39 AM
Jun 2023

gives new meaning to scraping the bottom.

Blues Heron

(8,838 posts)
9. just the fact that he has to make excuses for this trip down to the wine and
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 10:40 AM
Jun 2023

the seat would have been empty otherwise excuse is gratifying. watching this corrupt justice squirm under the spotlight is a thing to behold.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,212 posts)
10. He even gets public officials to lie on his behalf
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 10:47 AM
Jun 2023
ProPublica said it had sent Alito a “list of detailed questions last week, and on Tuesday, the Supreme Court’s head spokeswoman told ProPublica that Alito would not be commenting.”

And while she was claiming that, Alito was busy writing a WSJ op-ed as his comment.

Bayard

(29,693 posts)
11. Investigate the Supreme Court,
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 11:02 AM
Jun 2023

All of you nothing-better-to-do rethuglican legislators. You'd think they'd be trying to dig up dirt on the Dem members, or making it up.

Were some of the justices through history always this unethical, and we just didn't hear about it?

thenelm1

(912 posts)
13. And while they're at it, how about investigations into those making the bribes?
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 11:58 AM
Jun 2023

These so-call these "gifts" is just a way of putting lipstick on what this actually is, bribery. Which is also a crime.

Roy Rolling

(7,632 posts)
14. Clairvoyant
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 01:54 PM
Jun 2023

Fortunately, he preemptively disputed the article before it was even published. And that’s why the rubes believe the Supremes have super powers.

llmart

(17,622 posts)
16. "downplaying their relationship."
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 02:10 PM
Jun 2023

Ahhh...using the ole' Trumpy excuse of "I hardly know he guy. He may have been the cofeve boy."

Novara

(6,115 posts)
17. He posted his rebuttal BEFORE PRO PUBLICA POSTED THEIR ARTICLE
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 02:11 PM
Jun 2023

Feeling the heat now, Alito, you corrupt piece of garbage?

nuxvomica

(14,092 posts)
23. Like someone did with the Dobbs opinion
Thu Jun 22, 2023, 08:01 AM
Jun 2023

I see a pattern here of someone thinking they need to get ahead of the story.

dalton99a

(94,129 posts)
18. Alito's defense of his free private jet trip and non-recusal reeks of desperation
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 02:26 PM
Jun 2023
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/samuel-alito-supreme-court-propublica-desperation-rcna90347

Alito’s defense of his free private jet trip and non-recusal reeks of desperation
The Supreme Court justice tried to get out in front of a damning story but made himself look worse.
June 21, 2023, 12:04 PM CDT
By Jordan Rubin

...

GOP judicial kingmaker Leonard Leo, who also features in the ongoing Clarence Thomas scandal and seemingly everything else that's shady in the courts, reportedly helped organize the Alaska trip. According to ProPublica, Leo invited Singer and asked if he and Alito — whose Supreme Court confirmation Leo helped secure in 2006 — could fly on the billionaire’s jet. Singer and the fishing lodge owner “were both major donors to Leo’s political groups,” the nonprofit outlet reported.

In Alito’s Wall Street Journal op-ed, published hours before the ProPublica report on Tuesday, he argued that he didn’t have to recuse from matters involving entities connected to Singer, nor did he have to disclose gifts from the fishing trip on his 2008 disclosure. Far from helping his case, however, Alito made himself look even worse.

For starters, it's beyond weird for a Supreme Court justice to publish such an op-ed. The court has a public information office. Recall that the Journal's opinion page earlier this year published an interview with Alito that likewise served as a safe platform for airing his grievances. The op-ed takes it to the next level. To be clear, Alito made a deliberate choice to speak through the Journal's opinion page that represents the nation's Republican elite. He wasn't speaking to the American people but to particular people. His people.

Digging into the substance of his argument, Alito claimed he didn’t know Singer was connected to the 2014 case because Singer’s name wasn’t listed in the court documents, and the justice further claimed that, even if he knew of Singer’s involvement, he wouldn’t have had to recuse anyway. But Alito’s claim that he didn’t know Singer was connected to the case is suspect, because even the justice’s beloved Wall Street Journal opinion page noted at the time of the decision the well-known fact that the named entity in the long-running case, NML Capital, was a subsidiary of Singer’s Elliott Management.

...

Igel

(37,535 posts)
27. And he either had to or didn't.
Thu Jun 22, 2023, 06:55 PM
Jun 2023

And that's the question, if evidence is a concern.

Blue Owl

(59,107 posts)
20. FUCK Alito and FUCK Thomas
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 05:18 PM
Jun 2023

If they were Democrats and they did this, they'd be run out of town by now

V850i

(125 posts)
21. Did he barely know him or were they friends?
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 11:00 PM
Jun 2023

In his op-ed, Alito said that he has spoken to Singer “on no more than a handful of occasions” with the exception of “small talk” during a fishing trip 15 years ago and said the ProPublica charges against him are not “valid.”

So if he barely knew Singer then what is he doing taking such a lavish vacations gifts from him?

If he did know him then why didn't he recuse himself from cases that Singer had a direct interest in?

RussBLib

(10,635 posts)
22. Supreme Court Stench!
Thu Jun 22, 2023, 12:12 AM
Jun 2023

How bad is it going to get? I wonder how much more ProPublica is working on?

mercuryblues

(16,413 posts)
26. Why?
Thu Jun 22, 2023, 10:58 AM
Jun 2023

Thomas is still on the bench after they expose his and Ginny's abject corruption.

It seems to me the Conservatives on the bench are saying ... So what, we're corrupt. whacha gonna do about it?

yardwork

(69,364 posts)
25. The WSJ seems to be open for business, renting out space.
Thu Jun 22, 2023, 09:20 AM
Jun 2023

I keep reading about op-ed and editorials that appear overnight in the WSJ the day before bad news breaks. Seems to be for hire.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Alito disputes new ProPub...